Literature DB >> 35858847

Screening of BRCA1/2 variants in Mauritanian breast cancer patients.

Selma Mohamed Brahim1,2, Ekht Elbenina Zein2, Crystel Bonnet3, Cheikh Tijani Hamed4, Malak Salame1, Mohamed Vall Zein2, Meriem Khyatti5, Ahmedou Tolba2, Ahmed Houmeida6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Carrying a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant increases greatly young women's risk of developing breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to provide the first genetic data on BC in Mauritania.
METHODS: Using NGS based screening; we searched for BRCA1/2 variants in DNA samples from 137 patients diagnosed for hereditary BC.
RESULTS: We identified 16 pathogenic or likely pathogenic (PV) variants carried by 38 patients. Two predominant BRCA1 PV variants were found: c.815_824dup and c.4986 + 6 T > C in 13 and 7 patients, respectively. Interestingly, three novels BRCA1/2 predicted pathogenic variants have also been detected. Notably, no specific distribution of BRCA1/2 variants was observed regarding triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) or patient gender status.
CONCLUSIONS: In this first genetic profiling of BC in Mauritania, we identified a substantial number of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. This finding could be important in the future diagnosis and prevention policy of hereditary BC in Mauritania.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/2; Breast cancer (BC); Mauritania; Variant; Women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35858847      PMCID: PMC9301826          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09903-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.638


Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the second cause of death by cancer in women [1]. Screening for inherited variants in patients with BC has significantly increased over the past 30 years. About 20% of all BC cases described worldwide have a genetic origin with a large heterogeneity in the percentage of pathogenic variants (PVs) [2-4]. Somatic variants represent the most common cause of cancer while germline variants accounts for approximately 5% of BC. Although two-thirds of these variants were found in BRCA1/2, other genes such as ATM, PALB2, CHEK2, PTEN and TP53 have been also reported in hereditary BC, ovarian cancer (OC), and pancreatic cancer (PC) [5, 6]. Using NGS-based multi-gene panel testing, many cases with strong personal and/or family history of cancer were indeed found to be BRCA1/2-wild-type. For instance, a significant proportion of 15.1% of BC, OC, or PC germline pathogenic variants was observed in susceptibility genes other than BRCA1/A2 among bilateral BC patients and therefore would have been over looked [7, 8]. The major risk of developing BC due to these variants and the large benefit of their early detection have made genetic screening for hereditary BC recommended to patients with family history in many countries even though the implication of these PV variants in defining the cancer clinical and phenotypic features remained unanswered [9]. Due to its comprehensive genomic coverage and higher sensitivity, next generation sequencing (NGS) has become an essential tool in tumor profiling [10]. However, this technology remained poorly used in African countries mainly due to its elevated running cost [11-13]. In this study, using NGS methodology, we reported the first BRCA1/2 mutational profile of a BC patients’ cohort in Mauritania and assessed the relevance of detected variants to the carriers’ demographic and clinical characteristics.

Patients and methods

Patients

In this study, 137 Mauritanian BC patients (132 women and 5 men) whose demographic and clinical data were complete and available to participate to the genetic screening were selected if they met one of the following criteria: Age below 45 years when diagnosed with BC Bilateral BC BC detected in two or more relatives (first or second degree) in the family BC in men Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) diagnosed before the age of 60 years. Demographic and clinical characteristics of recruited subjects included age at diagnosis, family history of the disease, cancer staging and histological grading. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC), when accessible, was carried out on patient tissue samples embedded in paraffin blocks. Grading (from T0 to T4) was performed according to the American joint committee on cancer/ /Union for international cancer control (AJCC /UICC) systems. Evaluation of cancer stage (from 0 to 4) used TNM staging. TNBC patients were referred to subjects with IHC slides showing no antibody staining or a tumor cells fluorescence less than 1% for, concomitantly, receptors of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and hormone epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2).

BRCA1 and BRACA2 molecular screening

Extraction of DNA from peripheral blood collected in EDTA tubes was carried out using QIAampDNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentration and quality were assessed by NanoDrop (Jenway) spectrophotometer and agarose electrophoresis, respectively. Screening of the BRCA1/2 variants was performed using the ONCO/Reveal™ BRCA1/BRCA2 panel (Pillar Biosciences, Natick, MA). This technique consisted of a robust NGS assay to sequence the entire coding regions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes plus 20 bp of flanking introns. It is based on the use of proprietary Stem-Loop Inhibition-Mediated amplification (SLIMamp®), a tiled amplicon-based library prep chemistry for efficient single-tube target enrichment. Sequencing was then performed on MiSeq platform as recommended by the manufacturer (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) at Colorado sequencing center (https://thesequencingcenter.com/).

Bioinformatics

Alignment of the sequence reads, in FastQ format, was referred to the reference human genome 19 (hg19). Variant annotations were carried out using databases including HapMap project (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), 1000 Genome Project (http://www.1000genomes.org/), Exome Variant Server (EVS, http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), and Exome Aggregation Consortium (EXAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/). DNA variants were considered as pathogenic if cited by ClinVar record or reported by in silico analysis with PolyPhen2, (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT, http://sift.jcvi.org/) or Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/).

Statistics

Demographic and clinic-pathologic characteristics of patients were statistically assessed by SPSS data analysis package version 23.0 software (Chicago, Ill).

Results

Demographic and pathological features of the cohort

The demographic and clinico-pathological characteristics of 137 BC patients (132 women and 5 men) were shown in Table 1. Women were aged between 26 and 76 years with an mean age of 45 years at time of diagnosis of BC. Family history (patients with first- or second-degree relatives with BC) was reported in 41(30%) BC patients and consanguinity observed in 63 (46%) patients.
Table 1

Demographic and clinico-pathological characteristic of the study population

ParametersPatients (137)Percentage (%)
Total of patients137
Females13296.35
Males53.65
Age at diagnosis (years)

Mean age

Women 45

Men 67

< 352216.06
[35–55]9569.34
> 552014.60
Familyhistory
 Present4129.93
 Absent9670.07
Consanguinity
 Yes6345.99
 Non7454.01
Ethnicity
 White Moors7353.28
 Black Moors4532.85
 Black Africans1913.87
Histological grading
 Grade I128.6
 Grade II8058.39
 Grade III4532.85
Staging
 Stage I21.46
 Stage II4230.66
 Stage III6144.53
 Stage IV3223.36
Histological type
 Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC)11483.21
 Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC)128.75
118.04
Immunohistochemistry (N = 96)
 TNBC4546.87
 NTNB5153.13
Demographic and clinico-pathological characteristic of the study population Mean age Women 45 Men 67 Cells abnormality was diagnosed at poorly differentiated status (grade III) in 45 (32.8%) patients. BC was at stage III in 61 (44.5%) and metastasized (stage IV) in 32 (23.4%) patients. Cancer stretching into breast surrounding tissues showed presence of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) in 114 (83.2%) and 12 (8.8%) patients, respectively. Among 96 patients with satisfactory immunohistochemical data, 45 (46.9%) were classified triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) as no antibody staining above cut off was detected simultaneously for ER, PR and HER-2 receptors. The five men with BC recruited had an age between 42 and 95 years. They all had unilateral (left or right) advanced BC with IDC in 4 of them. Only one male was TNBC.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variants in the study population

BRCA1/2 NGS-based screening of the cohort identified sixteen pathogenic (PV) or likely pathogenic variants (PLPVs) (8 in BRCA1 and 8 in BRCA2) observed in 38 patients (28.8% of total BC patients) (Table 2). PV/LPV variants were carried by 11 different families among 41 enrolled patients with family history (1st or 2nd degree affected) of BC recruited. Pedigrees of the most prevalent pathogenic variants were presented in Fig. 1. Among the PV/LPV variants, we had seven missense, four insertions, four deletions and one splice site variants. The two predominant variants were frameshift (c.815_824dup) in exon 10 and splice site variant (c.4986 + 6 T > C) in intron 15, found in 13 and 7 BC patients, respectively. Both changes were located in BRCA1 gene. Frameshift variants (c.7234_7235insG and c.6280_6286del) of BRCA2 gene were identified in 4 and 2 patients, respectively.
Table 2

List of pathogenic and likely pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes variants found in Mauritanian hereditary BC patients

GeneChromosome positionMutation typeDatabase IDGene locationnucleotide changeprotein changeClinicalsignificanceNumber of carriers
BRCA1chr17:41222939–41,222,939Intronrs80358086Intronicc.4986 + 6 T > Cpathogenic7
BRCA1chr17:41276061–41,276,061Missensers80356929Exon2c.53 T > Cp.Met18Thrlikely_pathogenic1
BRCA1chr17:41267755–41,267,755Missensers80357276Exon 3c.122A > Tp.His41Leulikely_pathogenic1
BRCA2chr13:32893402–32,893,402frameshiftUnreportedExon 3c.256delp.Leu86TerPathogenic1
BRCA2chr13:32911384–32,911,385frameshiftUnreportedExon 3c.2892_2893insCp.Met965HisfsTer17Pathogenic1
BRCA2chr13:32914767–32,914,773frameshiftrs80359572Exon 3c.6280_6286delp.Tyr2094LeufsTer23pathogenic2
BRCA2chr13:32929224–32,929,225frameshiftrs397507906Exon 3c.7234_7235insGp.Thr2412SerfsTer2pathogenic4
BRCA2chr13:32953609–32,953,609stop_gainedrs886040799Exon 3c.8910G > Ap.Trp2970Terpathogenic1
BRCA2chr13:32953902–32,953,902stop_gainedrs80359148Exon 3c.8969G > Ap.Trp2990Terpathogenic1
BRCA1chr17:41267746–41,267,746MissenseSee in ClinVarExon 4c.131G > Cp.Cys44SerPathogenic1
BRCA1chr17:41215374–41,215,374frameshiftrs80357553Exon 4c.5169delp.Glu1725LysfsTer5Pathogenic1
BRCA1chr17:41244539–41,244,540frameshiftrs80357617Exon4c.3008_3009delp.Phe1003Terpathogenic1
BRCA1chr17:41246734–41,246,735stop_gainedUnreportedExon 4c.813_814insTAGCCATGTGp.Glu272TerPathogenic1
BRCA1chr17:41246723–41,246,724frameshiftrs387906563Exon 10c.815_824dupp.Thr276Alafs*14pathogenic13
BRCA2chr13:32914292–32,914,292stop_gainedrs886040610Exon 11c.5800C > Tp.Gln1934Terpathogenic1
BRCA2chr13:32914617–32,914,617Missensers80358852Exon 11c.6125A > Gp.Gln2042ArgConflicting of pathogenicity1

*Novel mutations (3 unreported) are shown in bold

Fig. 1

Examples of pedigrees with patients carrying variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in the Mauritanian population

Examples of pedigrees with patients carrying variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in the Mauritanian population List of pathogenic and likely pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes variants found in Mauritanian hereditary BC patients *Novel mutations (3 unreported) are shown in bold Interestingly, we identified four variants never reported before (Tables 2 and 3): One (c.813_814insTAGCCATGTG) in BRCA1 and three (c.256del, c.2892_2893insC and c.10247A > G) in BRCA2. Three of these novel variants were predicted pathogenic (Table 2).
Table 3

List of non-pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes variants found in Mauritanian hereditary BC patients

GeneChromosome positionMutation typeDatabase IDGene locationnucleotide changeprotein changeClinicalsignificanceNumber of carriers
BRCA2chr13:32893271–32,893,271Missensers4987046Exon 3c.125A > Gp.Tyr42Cysbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32972897–32,972,897MissenseUnreportedExon 3c.10247A > Gp.Lys3416Argbenign1
BRCA1chr17:41246481–41,246,481Missensers1799950Exon 9c.1067A > Gp.Gln356Argbenign1
BRCA1chr17:41246411–41,246,411Missensers56128296Exon 9c.1137 T > Gp.Ile379Metbenign1
BRCA1chr17:41245471–41,245,471Missensers4986850Exon 9c.2077G > Ap.Asp693Asnbenign5
BRCA1chr17:41256155–41,256,155Missensers55971303Exon 10c.425C > Ap.Pro142Hisbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32906480–32,906,480Missensers766173Exon 10c.865A > Cp.Asn289Hisbenign1
BRCA1chr17:41245090–41,245,090Missensers56082113Exon 10c.2458A > Gp.Lys820Glubenign2
BRCA1chr17:41244429–41,244,429Missensers4986852Exon 10c.3119G > Ap.Ser1040Asnbenign2
BRCA1chr17:41244936–41,244,936Missensers799917Exon11c.2612C > Tp.Pro871Leubenign70
BRCA2chr13:32911278–32,911,278Missensers2227943Exon 11c.2786 T > Cp.Leu929Serbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32912679–32,912,679Missensers55969723Exon 11c.4187A > Gp.Gln1396Argbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32914132–32,914,132Missensers11571657Exon 11c.5640 T > Gp.Asn1880Lysbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32914196–32,914,196Missensers4987048Exon 11c.5704G > Ap.Asp1902Asnbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32914712–32,914,712Missensers34309943Exon 11c.6220C > Ap.His2074Asnbenign1
BRCA1chr17:41226423–41,226,423Missensers55815649Exon 13c.4600G > Ap.Val1534Metbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32929309–32,929,309Missensers4986860Exon 14c.7319A > Gp.His2440Argbenign1
BRCA2chr13:32953529–32,953,529Missensers4987047Exon 22c.8830A > Tp.Ile2944Phebenign1
BRCA2chr13:32972884–32,972,884Missensers1801426Exon 27c.10234A > Gp.Ile3412Valbenign3

*Novel mutations (1 unreported) are shown in bold

List of non-pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes variants found in Mauritanian hereditary BC patients *Novel mutations (1 unreported) are shown in bold Twelve of the 42 TNBC patients carried pathogenic variants: 7 in BRCA1 and 5 in BRCA2. Nineteen non pathogenic variants (8 in BRCA1 and 11 in BRCA2) were detected in 96 BC patients (73.8%) (Table 3). Carriers of all variants originated from different regions of the country (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Geographic distribution of reported BRCA1/2 variants in Mauritania

Geographic distribution of reported BRCA1/2 variants in Mauritania

Discussion

Although poor socioeconomic conditions and reduced access to adequate healthcare may have been determinant in BC development and outcome among our cohort, genetic origin was also likely giving the high rate of consanguinity (46%), the early average age of women (45 years) and advanced phase of BC at diagnosis observed in our cohort. Indeed, numerous data showed a higher incidence of common adult diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus or cancer in patients from consanguineous marriages [14]. Reports also indicated that close-kin marriage continued to be preferential in North and sub-Saharan Africa with a prevalence of marriages between couples related as second cousins or closer exceeding 40% in countries including Mauritania [15, 16]. Gene predisposition has been suggested in the younger median age at BC diagnosis among Eastern Mediterranean women compared to women in Western European countries [17, 18]. An equivalent early age at BC detection (47 years) was also observed in Sub-Saharan and British black women while most Caucasian women had a BC onset at 67 years [19-22]. In this first study providing molecular data on BC in our country, among the 137 BC patients recruited at the only state cancer referring center, 38 (27.7%) carried a BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. In neighboring North African region, the frequency of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in Moroccan population varied from 16.7 to 31.6% [23]. In Tunisia, 25% of hereditary BC patients carried a BRCA1/2 gene pathogenic variant [24]. The BRCA1/2 variant ratio we found (1:1.18) was also consistent with the fraction reported by these different studies which confirmed the significant contribution of BRCA1/2 germline variant in BC risk among North African populations [25, 26]. Although we did not perform functional validation of the BRCA1/2 deleterious variants identified in our cohort, most common PV/LPVs we found were already reported as associated with BC. Indeed (c.815_824dup p.Thr276Alafs*14) (found here in 34.2% of patients), was diagnosed in 15 of 27 (55.5%) patients of hereditary BC cases in neighboring Senegal with a founder effect in Afro-American patients [27]. This BRCA1 duplication leading to a premature stop codon was revealed as pathogenic variant by ClinVar here and in other studies [27, 28]. It was also submitted by HGSC-CL as pathogenic germline variant using clinical testing [29, 30]. The relatively high and concordant frequency in our cohort and in Senegal further highlights the pathogenic character of this variant in BC assessment and prevention in West African families [27, 31–33]. The second pathogenic variant (c.4986 + 6 T > C) in BRCA1 carried by seven of our BC patients has also been detected in multiple African patients with an early-onset of BC [34, 35]. This splicing site variant is located in highly conserved human genome region and seems to activate a cryptic splice donor site which alters the reading frame resulting in absent or truncated protein [36, 37]. It was proposed by ClinVar as pathogenic germline allele by numerous submitters [35, 38]. We also found that among the 12 TNBC patients carrying a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, 7 had a BRCA1 variant which substantiates data suggesting that patients with BRCA1 variants were more likely to have TNBC than those with BRCA2 variants [39, 40]. Due to the limited number of BC patients here, we could not conclude on the association of the pathogenic variant frequency and the BC phenotypic features (molecular tumor subtypes) as investigated elsewhere [40]. For instance, BRCA1-633delC was detected with relatively higher prevalence in patients with TNBC, whereas BRCA2-1466delT was found mainly in Luminal B tumors, but not in TNBC patient [40]. Our study also identified three novel predicted pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants never reported before. These variants could be specific to our population. Territorial prevalence has for instance reported among families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in families from southern Italy with a higher prevalence of PVs in Sicilian population [41]. One limitation of this single gene testing was that only BRCA1/2 was explored in this cohort while a NGS-based multi-gene panel testing could have revealed more potentially BC pathogenic variants. It was thus showed that 19 out of 53 positively tested bilateral BC patients harbored a germline PVs in a known (no-BRCA) BC susceptibility gene which clearly support the inclusion of multi-gene panel with high or intermediate penetrant BC genetic predisposition [7, 8]. Although highly pertinent, we could not currently perform such a study giving the high cost of this profiling.

Conclusions

Our study gave the first data on BRCA1/2 alterations likely underlying hereditary BC in Mauritania using a powerful NGS based screening. A multi-gene panel testing of all BC patients followed by Sanger sequencing confirmation should avoid underestimation of affected patients and pave way to more cancer associated PV/LPV variants identification in hereditary tumor surveillance and targeted therapy choice. Most of PV/LPVs variants identified in our cohort were previously reported in other African populations geographically remote and culturally apparently not related. This BC heterogeneous heredity confirmed the complex genetic structure of African populations shaped by successive voluntary or forced migrations, integrations and assimilations over many centuries.
  36 in total

1.  Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Tom Walsh; Silvia Casadei; Ming K Lee; Christopher C Pennil; Alex S Nord; Anne M Thornton; Wendy Roeb; Kathy J Agnew; Sunday M Stray; Anneka Wickramanayake; Barbara Norquist; Kathryn P Pennington; Rochelle L Garcia; Mary-Claire King; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic sequence variants in Middle Eastern, North African, and South European countries.

Authors:  Yael Laitman; Tara M Friebel; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Florentia Fostira; Irene Konstantopoulou; Gisella Figlioli; Bernardo Bonanni; Siranoush Manoukian; Monica Zuradelli; Carlo Tondini; Barbara Pasini; Paolo Peterlongo; Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska; Milena Jakimovska; Keivan Majidzadeh; Shiva Zarinfam; Maria A Loizidou; Andreas Hadjisavvas; Kyriaki Michailidou; Kyriacos Kyriacou; Doron M Behar; Rinat Bernstein Molho; Patricia Ganz; Paul James; Michael T Parsons; Aminah Sallam; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Arun Seth; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Goska Leslie; Lesley McGuffog; Makia J Marafie; Andre Megarbane; Fahd Al-Mulla; Timothy R Rebbeck; Eitan Friedman
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Increased Identification of Candidates for High-Risk Breast Cancer Screening Through Expanded Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Eric T Rosenthal; Brent Evans; John Kidd; Krystal Brown; Heidi Gorringe; Michael van Orman; Susan Manley
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Clinicopathological, Treatment and Event-Free Survival Characteristics in a Moroccan Population of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Zahra Mouh; Meriem Slaoui; Rachid Razine; Mohammed El Mzibri; Mariam Amrani
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2020-04-29

5.  Screening of BRCA1 variants c.190T>C, 1307delT, g.5331G>A and c.2612C>T in breast cancer patients from North India.

Authors:  Akeen Kour; Vasudha Sambyal; Kamlesh Guleria; Neeti Rajan Singh; Manjit Singh Uppal; Mridu Manjari; Meena Sudan
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Next-generation sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Moroccan prostate cancer patients with positive family history.

Authors:  Fatiha Salmi; Fatima Maachi; Amal Tazzite; Rachid Aboutaib; Jamal Fekkak; Houssine Azeddoug; Hassan Jouhadi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Tara M Friebel; Eitan Friedman; Ute Hamann; Dezheng Huo; Ava Kwong; Edith Olah; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Angela R Solano; Soo-Hwang Teo; Mads Thomassen; Jeffrey N Weitzel; T L Chan; Fergus J Couch; David E Goldgar; Torben A Kruse; Edenir Inêz Palmero; Sue Kyung Park; Diana Torres; Elizabeth J van Rensburg; Lesley McGuffog; Michael T Parsons; Goska Leslie; Cora M Aalfs; Julio Abugattas; Julian Adlard; Simona Agata; Kristiina Aittomäki; Lesley Andrews; Irene L Andrulis; Adalgeir Arason; Norbert Arnold; Banu K Arun; Ella Asseryanis; Leo Auerbach; Jacopo Azzollini; Judith Balmaña; Monica Barile; Rosa B Barkardottir; Daniel Barrowdale; Javier Benitez; Andreas Berger; Raanan Berger; Amie M Blanco; Kathleen R Blazer; Marinus J Blok; Valérie Bonadona; Bernardo Bonanni; Angela R Bradbury; Carole Brewer; Bruno Buecher; Saundra S Buys; Trinidad Caldes; Almuth Caliebe; Maria A Caligo; Ian Campbell; Sandrine M Caputo; Jocelyne Chiquette; Wendy K Chung; Kathleen B M Claes; J Margriet Collée; Jackie Cook; Rosemarie Davidson; Miguel de la Hoya; Kim De Leeneer; Antoine de Pauw; Capucine Delnatte; Orland Diez; Yuan Chun Ding; Nina Ditsch; Susan M Domchek; Cecilia M Dorfling; Carolina Velazquez; Bernd Dworniczak; Jacqueline Eason; Douglas F Easton; Ros Eeles; Hans Ehrencrona; Bent Ejlertsen; Christoph Engel; Stefanie Engert; D Gareth Evans; Laurence Faivre; Lidia Feliubadaló; Sandra Fert Ferrer; Lenka Foretova; Jeffrey Fowler; Debra Frost; Henrique C R Galvão; Patricia A Ganz; Judy Garber; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Andrea Gehrig; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Paul Gesta; Giuseppe Giannini; Sophie Giraud; Gord Glendon; Andrew K Godwin; Mark H Greene; Jacek Gronwald; Angelica Gutierrez-Barrera; Eric Hahnen; Jan Hauke; Alex Henderson; Julia Hentschel; Frans B L Hogervorst; Ellen Honisch; Evgeny N Imyanitov; Claudine Isaacs; Louise Izatt; Angel Izquierdo; Anna Jakubowska; Paul James; Ramunas Janavicius; Uffe Birk Jensen; Esther M John; Joseph Vijai; Katarzyna Kaczmarek; Beth Y Karlan; Karin Kast; KConFab Investigators; Sung-Won Kim; Irene Konstantopoulou; Jacob Korach; Yael Laitman; Adriana Lasa; Christine Lasset; Conxi Lázaro; Annette Lee; Min Hyuk Lee; Jenny Lester; Fabienne Lesueur; Annelie Liljegren; Noralane M Lindor; Michel Longy; Jennifer T Loud; Karen H Lu; Jan Lubinski; Eva Machackova; Siranoush Manoukian; Véronique Mari; Cristina Martínez-Bouzas; Zoltan Matrai; Noura Mebirouk; Hanne E J Meijers-Heijboer; Alfons Meindl; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Ugnius Mickys; Austin Miller; Marco Montagna; Kirsten B Moysich; Anna Marie Mulligan; Jacob Musinsky; Susan L Neuhausen; Heli Nevanlinna; Joanne Ngeow; Huu Phuc Nguyen; Dieter Niederacher; Henriette Roed Nielsen; Finn Cilius Nielsen; Robert L Nussbaum; Kenneth Offit; Anna Öfverholm; Kai-Ren Ong; Ana Osorio; Laura Papi; Janos Papp; Barbara Pasini; Inge Sokilde Pedersen; Ana Peixoto; Nina Peruga; Paolo Peterlongo; Esther Pohl; Nisha Pradhan; Karolina Prajzendanc; Fabienne Prieur; Pascal Pujol; Paolo Radice; Susan J Ramus; Johanna Rantala; Muhammad Usman Rashid; Kerstin Rhiem; Mark Robson; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Mark T Rogers; Vilius Rudaitis; Ane Y Schmidt; Rita Katharina Schmutzler; Leigha Senter; Payal D Shah; Priyanka Sharma; Lucy E Side; Jacques Simard; Christian F Singer; Anne-Bine Skytte; Thomas P Slavin; Katie Snape; Hagay Sobol; Melissa Southey; Linda Steele; Doris Steinemann; Grzegorz Sukiennicki; Christian Sutter; Csilla I Szabo; Yen Y Tan; Manuel R Teixeira; Mary Beth Terry; Alex Teulé; Abigail Thomas; Darcy L Thull; Marc Tischkowitz; Silvia Tognazzo; Amanda Ewart Toland; Sabine Topka; Alison H Trainer; Nadine Tung; Christi J van Asperen; Annemieke H van der Hout; Lizet E van der Kolk; Rob B van der Luijt; Mattias Van Heetvelde; Liliana Varesco; Raymonda Varon-Mateeva; Ana Vega; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Anna von Wachenfeldt; Lisa Walker; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Bernhard H F Weber; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Sook-Yee Yoon; Cristina Zanzottera; Jamal Zidan; Kristin K Zorn; Christina G Hutten Selkirk; Peter J Hulick; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Amanda B Spurdle; Antonis C Antoniou; Katherine L Nathanson
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.700

8.  Assessment of the Prognostic Value of Two Common Variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin and Paclitaxel: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Chunqiao Q Tian; Kathleen M Darcy; Thomas C Krivak; Julie A Deloia; Deborah Armstrong; Warren Davis; Hua Zhao; Kirsten Moysich; Christine B Ambrosone
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Impact of deleterious variants in other genes beyond BRCA1/2 detected in breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients by NGS-based multi-gene panel testing: looking over the hedge.

Authors:  M Bono; D Fanale; L Incorvaia; D Cancelliere; A Fiorino; V Calò; A Dimino; C Filorizzo; L R Corsini; C Brando; G Madonia; A Cucinella; R Scalia; N Barraco; F Guadagni; E Pedone; G Badalamenti; A Russo; V Bazan
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2021-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.