Literature DB >> 28011157

Increased Identification of Candidates for High-Risk Breast Cancer Screening Through Expanded Genetic Testing.

Eric T Rosenthal1, Brent Evans2, John Kidd2, Krystal Brown2, Heidi Gorringe2, Michael van Orman2, Susan Manley2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast MRI screening is recommended for women with a >20% lifetime risk for breast cancer on the basis of estimates derived from risk models dependent largely on family history. Alternatively, a >20% lifetime risk can be established through genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as a growing selection of other genes associated with inherited breast cancer risk. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of testing for genes other than BRCA1/2 and the extent to which mutation carriers in these genes would have been identified as candidates for enhanced screening on the basis of family history alone.
METHODS: Women were tested with a 25-gene hereditary cancer panel including BRCA1/2 and 7 additional genes known to be associated with a >20% lifetime risk for breast cancer (ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, TP53, PTEN, CDH1, and STK11). Women found to carry pathogenic variants (PVs) were evaluated with the Claus model to assess whether they would have been found to be at >20% lifetime risk on the basis of family history.
RESULTS: In total, 9,751 PVs in the selected breast cancer risk genes were identified in 9,641 women. BRCA1/2 accounted for 59.1% of the PVs, and 38.8% were in ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2. Only 24.7% of all women with PVs found in any gene reached the >20% lifetime risk threshold using the Claus model.
CONCLUSIONS: Expanding genetic testing beyond BRCA1/2 significantly increases the number of women who are candidates for breast MRI and other risk reduction measures, most of whom would not have been identified through family history assessment.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inherited breast cancer risk; breast MRI; genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011157     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  Mutation Rates in Cancer Susceptibility Genes in Patients With Breast Cancer With Multiple Primary Cancers.

Authors:  Kara N Maxwell; Brandon M Wenz; Abha Kulkarni; Bradley Wubbenhorst; Kurt D'Andrea; Benita Weathers; Noah Goodman; Joseph Vijai; Jenna Lilyquist; Steven N Hart; Thomas P Slavin; Kasmintan A Schrader; Vignesh Ravichandran; Tinu Thomas; Chunling Hu; Mark E Robson; Paolo Peterlongo; Bernardo Bonanni; James M Ford; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Payal D Shah; Angela R Bradbury; Angela M DeMichele; Kenneth Offit; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Susan M Domchek; Katherine L Nathanson
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-08-19

2.  Examining the uptake of predictive BRCA testing in the UK; findings and implications.

Authors:  Karen Lynn Greenhalgh; Munir Pirmohamed; Antony P Martin; Jennifer Downing; Brendan Collins; Brian Godman; Ana Alfirevic
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Saliva samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping: an acceptable and sufficient means in improvement of risk estimation throughout mammographic diagnostics.

Authors:  U G Poehls; C C Hack; A B Ekici; M W Beckmann; P A Fasching; M Ruebner; H Huebner
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Christiane K Kuhl; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations.

Authors:  Valentina Vysotskaia; K Eerik Kaseniit; Leslie Bucheit; Kaylene Ready; Kristin Price; Katherine Johansen Taber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  CHEK2 Germline Variants in Cancer Predisposition: Stalemate Rather than Checkmate.

Authors:  Lenka Stolarova; Petra Kleiblova; Marketa Janatova; Jana Soukupova; Petra Zemankova; Libor Macurek; Zdenek Kleibl
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Screening of BRCA1/2 variants in Mauritanian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Selma Mohamed Brahim; Ekht Elbenina Zein; Crystel Bonnet; Cheikh Tijani Hamed; Malak Salame; Mohamed Vall Zein; Meriem Khyatti; Ahmedou Tolba; Ahmed Houmeida
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Characterization of genetic predisposition to molecular subtypes of breast cancer in Brazilian patients.

Authors:  Daniele Paixão; Giovana Tardin Torrezan; Karina Miranda Santiago; Maria Nirvana Formiga; Samuel Terkper Ahuno; Emmanuel Dias-Neto; Israel Tojal da Silva; William D Foulkes; Paz Polak; Dirce Maria Carraro
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Prevalence of germ-line mutations in cancer genes among pancreatic cancer patients with a positive family history.

Authors:  Kari G Chaffee; Ann L Oberg; Robert R McWilliams; Neil Majithia; Brian A Allen; John Kidd; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Richard J Wenstrup; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.