Literature DB >> 35858413

A comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and the world.

Katarzyna Jasko1, Gary LaFree2, James Piazza3, Michael H Becker4.   

Abstract

Although political violence has been perpetrated on behalf of a wide range of political ideologies, it is unclear whether there are systematic differences between ideologies in the use of violence to pursue a political cause. Prior research on this topic is scarce and mostly restricted to self-reported measures or less extreme forms of political aggression. Moreover, it has generally focused on respondents in Western countries and has been limited to either comparisons of the supporters of left-wing and right-wing causes or examinations of only Islamist extremism. In this research we address these gaps by comparing the use of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and worldwide using two unique datasets that cover real-world examples of politically motivated, violent behaviors. Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing extremists to engage in more violent acts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ideology; terrorism; violence

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35858413      PMCID: PMC9335287          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122593119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  12 in total

Review 1.  Genesis of suicide terrorism.

Authors:  Scott Atran
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The end of the end of ideology.

Authors:  John T Jost
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006-10

3.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Jonathan Haidt; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-05

4.  False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased?

Authors:  Jonathan Baron; John T Jost
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-03

5.  Extremists on the Left and Right Use Angry, Negative Language.

Authors:  Jeremy A Frimer; Mark J Brandt; Zachary Melton; Matt Motyl
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-12-11

6.  Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes.

Authors:  Arnold K Ho; Jim Sidanius; Felicia Pratto; Shana Levin; Lotte Thomsen; Nour Kteily; Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-01-03

7.  Trustworthiness and Ideological Similarity (But Not Ideology) Promote Empathy.

Authors:  Samantha M Stevens; Carl P Jago; Katarzyna Jasko; Gail D Heyman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Are Liberals and Conservatives Equally Motivated to Feel Empathy Toward Others?

Authors:  Yossi Hasson; Maya Tamir; Kea S Brahms; J Christopher Cohrs; Eran Halperin
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-05-08

9.  A comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and the world.

Authors:  Katarzyna Jasko; Gary LaFree; James Piazza; Michael H Becker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism.

Authors:  Thomas H Costello; Shauna M Bowes; Sean T Stevens; Irwin D Waldman; Arber Tasimi; Scott O Lilienfeld
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-08-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  A comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and the world.

Authors:  Katarzyna Jasko; Gary LaFree; James Piazza; Michael H Becker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.