Literature DB >> 35855198

The Senologic International Society Survey on Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Present and Future.

Carole Mathelin1,2,3, Massimo Lodi1,2,3, Khalid Alghamdi1,4, Bolivar Arboleda-Osorio5, Eli Avisar6, Stanley Anyanwu7, Mohcen Boubnider8, Mauricio Maghales Costa9, Elisabeth Elder10, Tony Elonge11, Luiz Gebrim12, Xishan Hao13, Shigeru Imoto14, Esther Meka15, Michel Mouelle1,16, Alexander Mundinger17, Valerijus Ostapenko18, Serdar Özbaş19, Tolga Özmen6,20, Vahit Özmen21, Tadeusz Pienkowski22, Gustavo Sarria23, Ashraf Selim24, Vladimir Semiglazov25, Schlomo Schneebaum26.   

Abstract

Objective: Therapeutic management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is heterogeneous among countries worldwide, and some treatment indications are still controversial. To investigate DCIS management in different countries; identify both consensual practices and controversial topics; and survey opinions about the future management of DCIS. Materials and
Methods: The Senologic International Society network members participated to an online survey using a questionnaire, between November 2021 and February 2022.
Results: Twenty-two responses from 20 different countries showed that organized breast cancer screening programs were present for 87% participants, and DCIS cases represented 13.7% of all breast cancers. Most participants used the grade classification (100%), the morphological classification (78%) and performed immunohistochemistry assays (73%). In case of conservative treatment, the mean re-excision rate was 10.3% and clear margins of mean 2.5 mm were considered healthy. Radical mastectomy rate was 35.5% with a breast reconstruction rate of 53%. Tumor bed boost indications were heterogeneous, and 73% of participants indicated hormone therapy for hormone-positive DCIS. Surgery and radiotherapy omission for some low-risk DCIS were considered by 73% of participants. Multigene assays were used by 43% of participants. Concerning future changes in DCIS management, participants mostly answered surgical de-escalation (48%), radiotherapy de-escalation (35) and/or active surveillance for some cases (22%).
Conclusion: This survey provided an overview of the current practices of DCIS management worldwide. It showed that some areas are rather consensual: incidence increases over time, treatment in young women, pathological classifications, definition of healthy margins, the skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. However, some topics are still debated and result in heterogeneous practices, such as evolution in the age of diagnosis, the benefit of de-escalation in low-risk DCIS among elderly women, indications for hormone therapy, radiotherapy omission, or multigene assays. Further evidence is needed to reach consensus on these points, and innovative approaches are still under evaluation in clinical trials. The International Senologic Society, by its members, encourages precision medicine and personalized treatments for DCIS, to avoid overtreatment and overdiagnosis, and provide better healthcare to women with DCIS. ©Copyright 2022 by the the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies / European Journal of Breast Health published by Galenos Publishing House.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ductal carcinoma in situ; clinical practices; innovative approaches; precision medicine; survey; treatment de-escalation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35855198      PMCID: PMC9255660          DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-4-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  34 in total

1.  Trends in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ: the effect of a population-based screening programme.

Authors:  Ragnhild Sørum; Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane; Tor Haldorsen
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  [Overall survival and survival without local recurrence in case of radiotherapy of the tumor bed of ductal carcinomas in situ of the breast: Review of the literature].

Authors:  L Kuntz; C Le Fèvre; C Hild; A Keller; M Gharbi; C Mathelin; X Pivot; G Noël; D Antoni
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol       Date:  2021-01-02

3.  Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality in France 1990-2008.

Authors:  F Molinié; A Vanier; A S Woronoff; A V Guizard; P Delafosse; M Velten; L Daubisse-Marliac; P Arveux; B Tretarre
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy as treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: A 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Víctor Lago; Vincenzo Maisto; Julia Gimenez-Climent; Jose Vila; Carlos Vazquez; Rafael Estevan
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  A Biological Signature for Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Predict Radiotherapy Benefit and Assess Recurrence Risk.

Authors:  Troy Bremer; Pat W Whitworth; Rakesh Patel; Jess Savala; Todd Barry; Stephen Lyle; Glen Leesman; Steven P Linke; Karin Jirström; Wenjing Zhou; Rose-Marie Amini; Fredrik Wärnberg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS.

Authors:  Irene L Wapnir; James J Dignam; Bernard Fisher; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Stephanie R Land; Richard G Margolese; Sandra M Swain; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in ductal carcinoma in situ: a critical assessment with 41 patients.

Authors:  Franck Marie Leclère; Juliette Panet-Spallina; Frédéric Kolb; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Chafika Mazouni; Alexandre Leduey; Nicolas Leymarie; Françoise Rimareix
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Prospective study of wide excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Julia S Wong; Carolyn M Kaelin; Susan L Troyan; Michele A Gadd; Rebecca Gelman; Susan C Lester; Stuart J Schnitt; Dennis C Sgroi; Barbara J Silver; Jay R Harris; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee; Lawrence J Solin; Nehmat Houssami; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Jay R Harris; Janet Horton; Shelley Hwang; Peggy L Johnson; M Luke Marinovich; Stuart J Schnitt; Irene Wapnir; Meena S Moran
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.