| Literature DB >> 35854646 |
Eric B Emanuelsson1, David B Berry2,3,4, Stefan M Reitzner1,5, Muhammad Arif6, Adil Mardinoglu6,7, Thomas Gustafsson8,9, Samuel R Ward3,4,10, Carl Johan Sundberg1,8,11, Mark A Chapman1,12.
Abstract
This study investigated body composition measures in highly trained and untrained individuals using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, correlations between these measures and skeletal muscle gene expression were performed. Thirty-six individuals were included: endurance-trained males (ME, n = 8) and females (FE, n = 7), strength-trained males (MS, n = 7), and untrained control males (MC, n = 8) and females (FC, n = 6). MRI scans were performed, and resting M. vastus lateralis (VL) biopsies were subjected to RNA sequencing. Liver fat fraction, visceral adipose tissue volume (VAT), total body fat, and total lean tissue were measured from MRI data. Additionally, cross-sectional area (CSA) and fat signal fraction (FSF) were calculated from Mm. pectoralis, M. erector spinae and M. multifidus combined, Mm. quadriceps, and Mm. triceps surae (TS). Liver fat fraction, VAT, and total body fat relative to body weight were lower in ME and FE compared with corresponding controls. MS had a larger CSA across all four muscle groups and lower FSF in all muscles apart from TS compared with MC. ME had a lower FSF across all muscle groups and a larger CSA in all muscles except TS than MC. FE athletes showed a higher CSA in Mm. pectoralis and Mm. quadriceps and a lower CSA in TS than FC with no CSA differences found in the back muscles investigated. Surprisingly, the only difference in FSF between FE and FC was found in Mm. pectoralis. Lastly, correlations between VL gene expression and VL CSA as well as FSF showed that genes positively correlated with CSA revealed an enrichment of the oxidative phosphorylation and thermogenesis pathways, while the genes positively correlated with FSF showed significant enrichment of the spliceosome pathway. Although limited differences were found with training in females, our study suggests that both regular endurance and resistance training are useful in maintaining muscle mass, reducing adipose tissue deposits, and reducing muscle fat content in males.Entities:
Keywords: adipose tissue; endurance training; human; resistance training
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35854646 PMCID: PMC9296904 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Descriptive statistics of subject characteristics
| Female | Male | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Endurance | Control | Endurance | Strength | |
|
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Age (years) | 43.8 (5.3) | 42.3 (4.9) | 42.4 (4.6) | 41.6 (2.1) | 41.0 (7.3) |
| Weight (kg) | 65.9 (5.0) | 56.4 (4.0)a | 77.4 (11.9) | 76.3 (5.7) | 89.2 (10.7) |
| Height (cm) | 173 (7.9) | 169.0 (3.9) | 178.1 (10.1) | 183.1 (5.6) | 182.0 (8.5) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.6 (2.4) | 20.1 (1.3)a | 23.8 (1.4) | 22.5 (2.9) | 27.7 (3.2) |
| VO2 peak (ml/kg·min) | 31.8 (4.4) | 57.1 (2.9) | 36.0 (5.7) | 62.9 (7.2) | 40.9 (4.6) |
| Strength output (Nm) | 113.4 (18.9) | 122.6 (8.9) | 169.4 (34.6) | 200.9 (26.4) | 273.7 (34.8) |
Note: Baseline data are presented as mean (± standard deviation). Significance was set to p<0.05.
Significantly different from the control group.
Significantly different from the endurance group.
Significantly different from the strength group.
FIGURE 1Baseline body composition characteristics of research subjects. (a) Adipose tissue volume relative to body mass, (b) abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue volume, (c) visceral fat volume, (d) liver fat fraction, (e) lean body tissue relative to body mass, (f) posterior thigh volume, and (g) anterior thigh volume. Significance was set to 0.05. *Significantly different from the control group. #Significantly different from the endurance group. §Significantly different from the strength group. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 2Fat signal fraction (fat fraction) and cross‐sectional area (CSA) in male subjects calculated from Dixon MRIs. Regions of interest of the corresponding muscle groups are highlighted in yellow. (a) Mm. pectoralis, (b) M. erector spinaeand M. multifidus combined (ES/MF), (c) Mm. quadriceps, and (d) Mm. triceps surae (TS). All measurements were performed bilaterally, and the results were presented as averages of both left and right sides. Significance was set to 0.05. *Significantly different from the control group. #Significantly different from the endurance group. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 3Fat signal fraction (fat fraction) and cross‐sectional area (CSA) in female subjects calculated from Dixon MRIs. Regions of interest of the corresponding muscle groups are highlighted in yellow. (a) Mm p ectoralis, (b) M. erector spinae and M. multifiduscombined (ES/MF), (c) Mm. quadriceps, and (d) Mm. triceps surae (TS). All measurements were performed bilaterally, and the results were presented as averages of both left and right sides. Significance was set to 0.05.*Significantly different compared with the control group. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 4Relationship between quadriceps torque and anterior thigh volume. (a) Pooled relationship between torque output and anterior thigh volume of all test subjects, (b) torque output (N·m) per anterior thigh volume (L). Significance was set to 0.05. #Significantly different from the endurance group. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 5Network of all significantly (adjusted p‐value <0.05) correlated genes (peach circles) with M. vastus lateralis cross‐sectional area (CSA) and a fat signal fraction (FSF). Large peach circles represent the genes differentially expressed between the highlighted group comparison (FE vs. FC, ME vs. MC, and FE vs. FC/ME vs. MC combined). Small peach circles represent genes differentially expressed in nonhighlighted comparisons (MS vs. MC, ME vs. MS, FE vs. ME, and FC vs. MC) or genes that are not differentially expressed between groups (see Table S1 for a full list of genes and correlations). Line color indicates the nature of the correlation: blue, negative correlation; red, positive correlation. The circle border color indicates the direction of the gene expression in the highlighted comparison: blue, downregulated; red, upregulated. FC, female control; FE, female endurance; MC, male control; ME, male endurance; and MS, male strength.