Respiratory muscle activation patterns during maximum airway pressure efforts are different in women and men.

Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure values (PImax and PEmax) are indirect measures of respiratory muscle strength that, in healthy adults, are known to be significantly lower in women compared to men. In part, sex differences in breathing kinematics, lung size, body composition, muscle mass, and muscle fiber composition are thought to be responsible for these effects. However, it is not known whether respiratory muscle activation during maximum respiratory efforts is also sex-specific. In this study, we addressed whether respiratory multi-muscle activation patterns during PImax and PEmax efforts are different between healthy women and men. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), PImax, PEmax, and surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity recorded from respiratory muscles during these maximum airway pressure efforts were obtained in 13 women and 11 men. Percent predicted values of FVC and FEV1 were not significantly different in these two groups (women vs. men: 112 ± 14 vs. 105 ± 15%, p = 0.29; and 92 ± 12 vs. 93 ± 13, p = 0.82, Mean ± SD, respectively), while PImax and PEmax measures were significantly lower in women compared to men (68 ± 16 vs. 88 ± 19 cmH2O, p = 0.011; and 69 ± 13 vs. 94 ± 17, p = 0.0004, respectively). Using vector-based methodology, by calculating the Similarity Index (SI) as measure of the resemblance between two sEMG patterns and the Magnitude (Mag) representing the overall amount sEMG during motor task, we have found that although the Mag values for both PImax and PEmax tasks were not significantly different in two groups, the SIs revealed significant sex-dependent differences in muscle activation patterns (0.89 ± 0.08 vs. 0.97 ± 0.02, p = 0.016; and 0.77 ± 0.11 vs. 0.92 ± 0.04, p = 0.0006, respectively). During the PImax effort, presented as the percentage of total sEMG amplitude, activity of upper trapezius muscle was significantly larger (p = 0.001) while activation of rectus abdominus, oblique, and lower paraspinal muscles were significantly smaller (p = 0.002, p = 0.040, p = 0.005, respectively) in women when compared to the men (50 ± 21 vs. 22 ± 11%; 2 ± 2 vs. 8 ± 7; 4 ± 3 vs. 9 ± 7, 2 ± 3 vs. 7 ± 6, respectively). During PEmax effort, the percentage of sEMG activity were significantly larger in upper and lower trapezius, and intercostal muscles (p = 0.038, p = 0.049, p = 0.037, respectively) and were significantly smaller in pectoralis, rectus abdominus, and oblique muscles (p = 0.021, p < 0.0001, p = 0.048, respectively) in women compared to men (16 ± 10 vs. 9 ± 4%; 16 ± 9 vs. 8 ± 5; 36 ± 12 vs. 25 ± 9; 6 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 5; 14 ± 5 vs. 20 ± 7, respectively). These findings indicate that respiratory muscle activation patterns during maximum airway pressure efforts in healthy individuals are sex-specific. This information should be considered during respiratory motor control evaluation and treatment planning for people with compromised respiratory motor function.