| Literature DB >> 35852756 |
Sangita Agarwal1, Pritam Mukherjee2, Prosenjit Pramanick3, Abhijit Mitra4.
Abstract
In recent times, East Kolkata Wetlands (EKW), a designated Ramsar site in the eastern part of megacity Kolkata, has been threatened by toxic heavy metal (HM) pollution. Besides being a natural wetland supporting biodiversity, EKW serves as a significant food basket for the city. For assessing the magnitude of HM pollution in this wetland, the three most cultivated food crops of EKW, namely Lagenaria siceraria (bottle gourd), Abelmoschus esculentus (ladies' fingers), and Zea mays (maize), as well as the ambient soil samples, were collected during premonsoon, monsoon, and postmonsoon for 2 consecutive years (2016 and 2017). Predominant HMs like cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb) were analyzed in the roots and edible parts of these plants, as well as in the ambient soil to evaluate the bioaccumulation factor (BF) and translocation factor (TF) of each HM in the three vegetables. It was observed that the HM content in the food crop species followed the order Z. mays > L. siceraria > A. esculentus. HMs accumulated in all three vegetables as per the order Pb > Cd > Cr > Hg. Monsoon seems to be threatening in terms of bioaccumulation and translocation of HMs as both BF and TF were highest in this season irrespective of the plant species. Hence it demands critical monitoring of HM pollution levels in this wetland and subsequent ecorestoration through distinctive plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-assisted co-cultivation of these food crops with low-metal-accumulating, deep-rooted, high-biomass-yielding, and bioenergy-producing perennial grass species for minimizing HM intake.Entities:
Keywords: Abelmoschus esculentus; Bioaccumulation pattern; East Kolkata Wetlands; Ecorestoration; Heavy metals; Lagenaria siceraria; Zea mays
Year: 2022 PMID: 35852756 PMCID: PMC9294751 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-022-04057-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Biochem Biotechnol ISSN: 0273-2289 Impact factor: 3.094
Fig. 1Map showing the location of the study site, Dhapa (indicated with a red balloon) in East Kolkata Wetlands (22° 32′ 17.82″N; 88° 25′ 59.19″E), situated in the eastern fringe of the metropolitan city of Kolkata, West Bengal, India (source: Google Earth; earth.google.com/web/)
Fig. 2Representative images of the three selected vegetable species from the sampling site. a Lagenaria siceraria (bottle gourd). b Abelmoschus esculentus (ladies’ fingers or okra). c Zea mays (corn/maize). The red arrow indicates the edible plant part for each food crop species under study
Fig. 3Flow diagram of the methodology of heavy metal assessment in selected vegetable samples collected from East Kolkata Wetlands. The graphics are not drawn to scale
Fig. 4The concentration of biologically available selective heavy metals (in ppm) in the ambient soil during three seasons in 2016 and 2017. Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean of triplicate values. Pre, premonsoon; Mon, monsoon; Post, postmonsoon
Fig. 5The concentration of bioaccumulated selective heavy metals (in ppm) in the vegetative and reproductive parts of L. siceraria during three seasons in 2016 and 2017. Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean of triplicate values. Pre, premonsoon; Mon, monsoon; Post, postmonsoon
Fig. 6The concentration of bioaccumulated selective heavy metals (in ppm) in the vegetative and reproductive parts of A. esculentus during three seasons in 2016 and 2017. Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean of triplicate values. Pre, premonsoon; Mon, monsoon; Post, postmonsoon
Fig. 7The concentration of bioaccumulated selective heavy metals (in ppm) in the vegetative and reproductive parts of Z. mays during three seasons in 2016 and 2017. Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean of triplicate values. Pre, premonsoon; Mon, monsoon; Post, postmonsoon
Fig. 8Bioaccumulation factor of Pb, Cd, Cr, and Hg in roots and edible parts of the three selected vegetable species during three seasons in 2016 (a) and 2017 (b). Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean of triplicate values. Pre, premonsoon; Mon, monsoon; Post, postmonsoon; EP, edible parts
Fig. 9Translocation factor of Pb, Cd, Cr, and Hg in edible parts of the three selected vegetable species during three seasons in 2016 (a) and 2017 (b). Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean of triplicate values. Pre, premonsoon; Mon, monsoon; Post, postmonsoon
Analysis of variance of heavy metal concentrations in the roots and edible parts of the selected vegetables between species and seasons in 2016 and 2017
| Heavy metals | Years | Vegetative and reproductive plant parts | Variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 2016 | Roots | Between species | 49.5514 | 6.9443 |
| Between seasons | 20.1636 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 69.0481 | |||
| Between seasons | 28.7903 | ||||
| 2017 | Roots | Between species | 55.0981 | ||
| Between seasons | 28.0854 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 73.5346 | |||
| Between seasons | 36.9883 | ||||
| Cd | 2016 | Roots | Between species | 132.9815 | |
| Between seasons | 28.9794 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 399.5879 | |||
| Between seasons | 124.3323 | ||||
| 2017 | Roots | Between species | 609.2857 | ||
| Between seasons | 170.1475 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 89.4437 | |||
| Between seasons | 34.2301 | ||||
| Cr | 2016 | Roots | Between species | 50.9196 | |
| Between seasons | 4.7924 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 65.5419 | |||
| Between seasons | 8.4271 | ||||
| 2017 | Roots | Between species | 99.7378 | ||
| Between seasons | 13.5087 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 83.8178 | |||
| Between seasons | 11.7295 | ||||
| Hg | 2016 | Roots | Between species | 18.5525 | |
| Between seasons | 1.9626 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 11.5026 | |||
| Between seasons | 17.8114 | ||||
| 2017 | Roots | Between species | 30.1544 | ||
| Between seasons | 6.4684 | ||||
| Edible parts | Between species | 4.5817 | |||
| Between seasons | 3.0633 |
Note: Cd, cadmium; Cr, chromium; Hg, mercury; Pb, lead
Correlation between heavy metal concentration in soil and heavy metal concentrations in roots and edible parts of three selected vegetables during 2016 and 2017
| Heavy metals | Vegetable species | Combination | 2016 | 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Soil × roots | |||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Cd | Soil × roots | |||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Cr | Soil × roots | |||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Hg | Soil × roots | NS | ||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
| Soil × roots | ||||||
| Soil × edible parts | ||||||
Note: 1. Cd, cadmium; Cr, chromium; Hg, mercury; Pb, lead
2. p < 0.01, significant; NS, not significant
Comparison of the selected heavy metal content in soil and edible parts of dominant food crop species of East Kolkata Wetlands with the World Health Organization’s recommended permissible values
| Sl. no. | Selected heavy metals | Selected heavy metal concentration in the soil sample (mg/kg) | Selected food crop species | Selected heavy metal concentration in edible parts (mg/kg) | Reference concentration of heavy metals in the soil sample (mg/kg) [ | Permissible concentration of heavy metals in vegetables (mg/kg) [ | Adverse effects of heavy metal toxicity on human health [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pb | 12.02–45.22 | 23.59–35.45 | 10 | 0.1–0.3 | •Mental retardation in children •Developmental delay •Fatal infant encephalopathy •Congenital paralysis •Sensorineural hearing loss •Epilepsy •CNS, liver, kidney, and GI tract damage | |
| 13.51–29.67 | |||||||
| 31.78–42.33 | |||||||
| 2 | Cd | 1.69–7.68 | 5.88–13.98 | < 0.3 | 0.05–0.2 | •Cancer •Bone defects •Renal dysfunction •Bronchitis •Blood pressure problem | |
| 3.42–9.64 | |||||||
| 11.93–18.43 | |||||||
| 3 | Cr | 298.76–443.85 | 2.04–7.63 | 100 | 2.3 | •Irritability •Fatigue •Damage to CNS | |
| 1.86–5.56 | |||||||
| 9.83–17.21 | |||||||
| 4 | Hg | 0.98–1.81 | 0.88–2.04 | < 0.3 | 0.01–0.03 | •CNS damage •Tremors •Gingivitis •Psychological changes •Acrodynia* •Spontaneous abortion •Protoplasm poisoning | |
| 0.00–1.04 | |||||||
| 0.45–3.52 |
Note: 1. Cd, cadmium; Cr, chromium; Hg, mercury; Pb, lead
2. CNS, central nervous system; GI, gastrointestinal
3. Each value is the mean of 10 samples
4. *A rare disorder in infants and young children caused due to chronic Hg poisoning
Fig. 10Multi-metallotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-assisted co-cultivation of selected vegetable species with low-metal-accumulating, high-biomass-yielding, deep-rooted, bioenergy-producing perennial grass species for ecorestoration of metal-impacted, municipal solid waste dumping site of Kolkata (Dhapa) in East Kolkata Wetlands. Among the three food crop species under study, only one species (i.e., Z. mays) has been chosen for ease of representation. The use of two separate categories of PGPR strains, one for inoculating the food crop species and the other for inoculating the grassy species, is shown. It is to be noted that the graphic is not drawn to scale (created with BioRender.com)
SWOT analysis of the present study
| Sl. no. | Strengths | Weaknesses | Opportunities | Threats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The study determines the seasonal variation of HM concentrations (ppm per dry weight) in the selected vegetable species and the relative translocation of toxic HMs in the edible plant parts | The ecorestorative strategy needs to be standardized through in situ pilot-scale field studies and interaction with responsible authorities (institutional support) | The co-cultivation of selected vegetable species with low-metal-accumulating grassy species and PGPR as biofertilizers will give us safe food products | The overall result of this study might affect the livelihood of the farmers and vegetable vendors as people will stop purchasing these farm produce once they become aware of the toxicity of the vegetables they are consuming |
| 2 | Analysis of HM content in the selected vegetable species provides us with the knowledge and awareness of how safe is the food crops that the people of Kolkata are consuming from this farmland | It is also necessary to conduct field studies for regular monitoring of the growing food crop species for HM content using AAS in the study area of multi-metallotolerant PGPR-assisted co-cultivation where selected vegetable species and low-metal-accumulating, high-biomass-yielding, deep-rooted, bioenergy-producing perennial grassy species will be grown [ | Moreover, the use of PGPR as biofertilizers will not only help in stimulating the crop yield but also help in generating alternative livelihoods among the local populace | In addition, since Dhapa (in EKW) is a major food basket as well as a MSW dumping ground of the city, continued waste disposal in this area will result in unsafe farm produce that might affect the health and well-being of the people of Kolkata (due to the lack of alternative waste disposal site). So, both waste disposal and farming are equally crucial for the proper functioning of the city and the sustenance of its population |
AAS, atomic absorption spectroscopy; EKW, East Kolkata Wetlands; HM, heavy metal; MSW, municipal solid waste; PGPR, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
Heavy metal resistivity and plant growth-promoting traits of Kans grass rhizobacteria isolated from fly ash ponds of Mejia Thermal Power Station, West Bengal, India
| Isolated multi-metallotolerant PGPR strains | GenBank accession no. | HM resistivity | Pi solubilization (mg l−1) in 4 d | PSI | IAA (µg ml−1) in 120 min | Siderophore units (%) in 72 h | HCN (ppm) | NH3 (µmol ml−1) in 72 h | Bioassay with | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Cd | Cr | Hg | ||||||||||
| KT238975.1 | + + + + | + + | + + + | + | 700 | 2.86 | 26.71 | 90 | 19.5 | 0.5 | 0.700 and 0.210 | ||
| KT238976.1 | + + + + | + + | + + + | + | 600 | 2.31 | 19.04 | 60 | 35.2 | 6.0 | 0.678 and 0.186 | ||
| KT238977.1 | + + + + | + + | + + + | + | 640 | 2.40 | 13.75 | 85 | 10.6 | 6.2 | 0.669 and 0.180 | ||
Note: 1. HCN, hydrogen cyanide; HM, heavy metal; IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; NH3, ammonia; PGPR, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; Pi, inorganic phosphate; PSI, phosphate solubilization index
2. + + + + , + + + , + + , and + denote very high, high, moderate, and low HM resistivity, respectively
3. The mean values of triplicate data are given
4. HM bioaccumulation (for all four HMs) needs to be studied in these PGPR strains to see the level of HM concentration in the cell biomass in ppm per dry weight
5. Pot assays need to be done with the selective food crop species
6. Pb bioaccumulation increased in the B. juncea roots in the presence of individual PGPR strain or PGPR consortia. This might not be the case in the case of the selected vegetable species
7. Cd, Cr, and Hg bioaccumulation need to be assessed in the selected plant species in the presence or absence of PGPR strains in pot trials
8. Bioaccumulation factor (BF) and translocation factor (TF) for control were 0.501 and 0.120, respectively