| Literature DB >> 35851430 |
Rebecca H Bind1, Carolina Estevao2, Daisy Fancourt3, Katie Hazelgrove2, Kristi Sawyer2, Lavinia Rebecchini2, Celeste Miller2, Paola Dazzan2, Nick Sevdalis4, Anthony Woods2, Nikki Crane5, Manonmani Manoharan6, Alexandra Burton3, Hannah Dye7, Tim Osborn7, Lorna Greenwood7, Ioannis Bakolis4, Maria Baldellou Lopez4, Rachel Davis4, Rosie Perkins8,9, Carmine M Pariante2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postnatal depression (PND) affects 13% of new mothers, with numbers rising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this prevalence, many women have difficulty with or hesitancy towards accessing pharmacological and/or psychological interventions. Group-based mother-baby activities, however, have a good uptake, with singing improving maternal mental health and the mother-infant relationship. The recent lockdowns highlight the importance of adapting activities to an online platform that is wide-reaching and accessible. AIMS: The SHAPER-PNDO study will primarily analyse the feasibility of a 6-week online singing intervention, Melodies for Mums (M4M), for mothers with PND who are experiencing barriers to treatment. The secondary aim of the SHAPER-PNDO study will be to analyse the clinical efficacy of the 6-week M4M intervention for symptoms of postnatal depression.Entities:
Keywords: Arts intervention; COVID-19; Mental health; Online delivery; Postnatal depression; Singing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35851430 PMCID: PMC9289358 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01112-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud ISSN: 2055-5784
Fig. 1Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments
Fig. 2Recruitment strategy
Data collection plan
| Type of measure | Measures | Timepoint collected | Type of data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feasibility | Recruitment, attendance, retention and withdrawal rates, study completion | Throughout intervention period | Feasibility |
| Semi-structured interviews with a sub sample of 20–30 women and intervention deliverers to understand intervention uptake, acceptance, and acceptability | Week 6 | ||
| Mental health: screening tool for PND | Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) (33) | Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 16, 32 | Quantitative |
| Demographic information | Demographics interview, Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse-Questionnaire (CECA-Q) (34), Brief Life Events Scale (35), Intrusive Life Events Scale, Composite Abuse Scale (CAS) (36) | Baseline | |
| Mental health: depression, anxiety, wellbeing, stress | Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID-IV) (37) | Baseline | |
| Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) (38) | Baseline, week 6 | ||
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (39), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (40), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (41), Office for National Statistics Wellbeing Scale (ONS) (42) | Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 16, 32 | ||
| Social: mother-infant relationship | Maternal Postpartum Attachment Scale (MPAS) (43), Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) (44) | Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 16, 32 | |
| Crittenden CARE-Index (CCI) (45) | Baseline, weeks 6, 32 | ||
| Social: loneliness and social support | UCLA Loneliness Scale (46), Short General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE-6) (47), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (48) | Baseline, weeks 3, 6, 16, 32 | |
| Biological markers | Diurnal cortisol saliva samples | Baseline, week 6 | |
| Pre- and post-session saliva samples | Singing sessions 1, 6 | ||
| Qualitative interview | Semi-structured interviews with a sub sample of 20–30 women and intervention deliverers for clinical mechanisms of effect | After week 6 | Qualitative |
Study objectives and outcomes
| To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a group online singing intervention in order to ensure adequate recruitment for a future RCT | We will assess recruitment rates, retention rates, study completion rates, acceptability of intervention, and scalability to power a subsequent RCT |
| To assess the effectiveness of a group online singing intervention on symptoms of postnatal depression | Depressive symptoms measured before, during, and after the intervention using the EPDS The secondary outcome measure is change in total EPDS score between baseline and week 6 (endpoint of intervention) |
| To assess whether online singing improves further aspects of mental health | Depressive, anxious, and stress symptoms measured before, during, and after the intervention using the SCID, HDRS, BDI, ONS, STAI, and PSS The secondary outcome measure is change in total scores between baseline and week 6 (endpoint of intervention) |
| To ascertain whether online singing affects the mother-infant relationship | Aspects of the mother-infant relationship measured before, during, and after the intervention using the CCI, MPAS, and PRFQ The secondary outcome measure is change in total scores between baseline and week 6 (endpoint of intervention) |
| To ascertain whether online singing improves perceived social support and reduces loneliness | Social support and loneliness measured before, during, and after the intervention using the UCLA Loneliness Scale, MSPSS, and GSE-6 The secondary outcome measure is change in total scores between baseline and week 6 (endpoint of intervention) |
| To identify whether there are biological changes in stress mechanisms underpinning the psychological outcomes assessed | Cortisol from saliva samples The secondary outcome measure is change in circulating biomarkers |
| To explore the uptake and continued involvement in online singing groups | Qualitative interviews with a sub-sample of 20–30 women and the intervention deliverers |