Literature DB >> 19555590

Psychological interventions for postnatal depression: cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation. The PoNDER trial.

C J Morrell1, R Warner, P Slade, S Dixon, S Walters, G Paley, T Brugha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate outcomes for postnatal women attributed to special training for health visitors (HVs) in systematically identifying postnatal depression and delivering psychologically informed interventions, and to establish the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised cluster trial with clusters allocated to experimental HV training arms or control, with an 18-month follow-up.
SETTING: GP practices in the former Trent Regional Health Authority. PARTICIPANTS: Women registered with participating GP practices who became 36 weeks pregnant during the recruitment phase of the trial, had a live baby and were on a collaborating HV's caseload for 4 months postnatally. INTERVENTION: HV training in the assessment of postnatal women, combined with either cognitive behavioural approach (CBA) or person-centred approach (PCA) sessions for eligible women, plus the option of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor if indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of at-risk women with a 6-month Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score > or = 12. The primary comparison was between at-risk women in the combined clusters randomised to HV training and women in practices randomised to provide HV usual care. The secondary comparison was to determine any differences between the proportions of women with a 6-month EPDS score > or = 12 in the CBA and PCA groups.
RESULTS: HVs in 101 clusters in 29 primary care trusts collaborated in the study. From 7649 eligible women 4084 (53.4%) consented to take part: 17.3% (595/3449) of women who returned a 6-week questionnaire had a 6-week EPDS score > or = 12 and were at-risk women; 70.3% (418/595) of at-risk women had a 6-month EPDS score available. In total, 45.6% (67/147) of control group (CG) at-risk women had a 6-month EPDS score > or = 12 versus 33.9% (93/271) of intervention group (IG) women (p = 0.036). A total of 32.9% (46/140) of at-risk women in the CBA group versus 35.1% (46/131) in the PCA group had a 6-month EPDS score > or = 12 (p = 0.74). The CG mean 6-month EPDS score for at-risk women was 11.3 (SD 5.8) versus 9.2 (SD 5.4) for the IG (p = 0.002) and this remained statistically significant after adjusting for 6-week variables (p = 0.001). In total, 16.4% (150/914) of all women in the CG had a 6-month EPDS score > or = 12 compared with 11.7% (205/1745) in the IG (p = 0.003). The CG mean 6-month EPDS score for all women was 6.4 (SD 5.2) compared with 5.5 (SD 4.7) for the IG (p < 0.001). The economic analysis results showed a consistent pattern of psychological approaches being cost-effective at funding levels used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
CONCLUSIONS: HV training was effective compared with HV usual care in reducing the proportion of at-risk women with a 6-month EPDS score > or = 12, with a wide confidence interval for the estimated intervention effect, suggesting that the true treatment effect may be small. The effect remained for 1 year. The economic evaluation demonstrated that the HV intervention was highly likely to be cost-effective compared with the control. There was no difference in outcomes between the CBA and the PCA groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19555590     DOI: 10.3310/hta13300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  43 in total

1.  Addressing the Missing Part of Evidence-based Practice: The Importance of Respecting Clinical Judgment in the Process of Adopting a New Screening Tool for Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Vered Ben-David; Melissa Jonson-Reid; Ron Tompkins
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.835

2.  The development of two postnatal health instruments: one for mothers (M-PHI) and one for fathers (F-PHI) to measure health during the first year of parenting.

Authors:  G L Jones; C J Morrell; J M Cooke; D Speier; D Anumba; S Stewart-Brown
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Depression Treatment by Non-Mental-Health Providers: Incremental Evidence for the Effectiveness of Listening Visits.

Authors:  Rebecca L Brock; Michael W O'Hara; Lisa S Segre
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2017-03

4.  Economics and mental health: the current scenario.

Authors:  Martin Knapp; Gloria Wong
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 5.  The Neurobiological Impact of Postpartum Maternal Depression: Prevention and Intervention Approaches.

Authors:  Stacy S Drury; Laura Scaramella; Charles H Zeanah
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2016-01-11

6.  A pattern-mixture model approach for handling missing continuous outcome data in longitudinal cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Mallorie H Fiero; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Melanie L Bell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Postnatal women's experiences of management of depressive symptoms: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pauline Slade; C Jane Morrell; Anna Rigby; Karen Ricci; Janet Spittlehouse; Traolach S Brugha
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Cognitive behavioral therapy for primary care depression and anxiety: a secondary meta-analytic review using robust variance estimation in meta-regression.

Authors:  Anao Zhang; Lindsay A Borhneimer; Addie Weaver; Cynthia Franklin; Audrey Hang Hai; Samantha Guz; Li Shen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-04-19

Review 9.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Perinatal depression and child development: exploring the economic consequences from a South London cohort.

Authors:  A Bauer; S Pawlby; D T Plant; D King; C M Pariante; M Knapp
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.