Literature DB >> 35849081

Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns.

Zeng Fan, Qi Zhang, Yujun Jiang, Qianyi Qin, Sheng Huang, Jie Guo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the mandibular retromolar space among normal-divergent adult patients with different sagittal skeletal patterns by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCTs of a total of 120 normal-divergent adult patients were investigated. Patients were categorized into the following three groups according to their ANB angle: skeletal Class I (48 patients), skeletal Class II (36 patients), and skeletal Class III (36 patients). Four different planes parallel to the mandibular occlusal plane were used to measure the retromolar space. The retromolar space was measured by two reference lines and then compared between different sagittal skeletal patterns groups. The incidence of root contact with the inner lingual cortex was compared among the three groups.
RESULTS: The retromolar space of the Class III patients was significantly larger than that of Class I patients and Class II patients. Compared with Class I and Class III patients, Class II patients had a smaller retromolar space and higher incidence of contact with the inner cortex of the mandible.
CONCLUSIONS: Class III patients had a larger retromolar space than Class I patients and Class II patients in four different planes. The mandibular retromolar space should be evaluated by CBCT in patients who need mandibular molar distalization. © 0000 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; Molar distalization; Retromolar space; Sagittal skeletal pattern

Year:  2022        PMID: 35849081      PMCID: PMC9374353          DOI: 10.2319/112021-854.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.684


  21 in total

1.  Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice.

Authors:  J Kaley; C Phillips
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region.

Authors:  Kazuyo Yamada; Shingo Kuroda; Toru Deguchi; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto; Takashi Yamashiro
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review.

Authors:  Gregory Stylianos Antonarakis; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evolution of Class III treatment in orthodontics.

Authors:  Peter Ngan; Won Moon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Mandibular posterior anatomic limit for molar distalization.

Authors:  Sung-Jin Kim; Tae-Hyun Choi; Hyoung-Seon Baik; Young-Chel Park; Kee-Joon Lee
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Bone availability for mandibular molar distalization in adults with mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  Young Tak Choi; Yoon-Ji Kim; Kyung-Sook Yang; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Differential diagnostic analysis system.

Authors:  L L Merrifield; H A Klontz; J L Vaden
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Correlation between buccolingual tooth inclination and alveolar bone thickness in subjects with Class III dentofacial deformities.

Authors:  Michelle Sendyk; João Batista de Paiva; Jorge Abrão; José Rino Neto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Longitudinal changes in mandibular arch posterior space in adolescents with normal occlusion.

Authors:  Li-Li Chen; Tian-Min Xu; Jiu-Hui Jiang; Xing-Zhong Zhang; Jiu-Xiang Lin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.

Authors:  Burçak Kaya; Ayça Arman; Sina Uçkan; Ayşe Canan Yazici
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.