Literature DB >> 19509344

Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.

Burçak Kaya1, Ayça Arman, Sina Uçkan, Ayşe Canan Yazici.   

Abstract

This prospective study aimed to evaluate the effects of the zygoma anchorage system (ZAS) in buccal segment distalization in comparison with cervical headgear (CH). Thirty patients with Class II dental malocclusions were included in the study and were divided into two equal groups: the first group (10 females and 5 males, mean age 14.74 years at T1) received buccal segment distalization with ZAS and the second group (8 females and 7 males, mean age 15.26 years at T1) with CH. The skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes were measured on cephalograms obtained before (T1) and after (T2) distalization, and these changes were statistically evaluated using a repeated measures analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Wilcoxon test. The Class II buccal segment relationship was corrected to a Class I in an average period of 9.03 +/- 0.62 months in the ZAS group and 9.00 +/- 0.76 months in the CH group. Significant distalization was observed for the posterior teeth in both groups (P < 0.001). Distal tipping of all posterior teeth occurred in the CH group (P < 0.001), but only for the molars in the ZAS group (P < 0.001). The upper incisors retroclined, overjet decreased, and the upper and lower lips retruded in both groups. The ZAS provided absolute anchorage for distalization of the maxillary posterior teeth and can be used as an aesthetic and non-compliant alternative to extraoral traction in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19509344     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  5 in total

1.  Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients.

Authors:  M M El-Dawlatly; A M Abou-El-Ezz; F A El-Sharaby; Y A Mostafa
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Zeng Fan; Qi Zhang; Yujun Jiang; Qianyi Qin; Sheng Huang; Jie Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.684

3.  Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.

Authors:  Metin Nur; Mehmet Bayram; Mevlut Celikoglu; Dogan Kilkis; Ali Alper Pampu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  A comparative anchorage control study between conventional and self-ligating bracket systems using differential moments.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Francisco Herrero; Amine Fattal; Amirparviz R Davoody; Ravindra Nanda; Flavio Uribe
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Bilateral en-masse distalization of maxillary posterior teeth with skeletal anchorage: a case report.

Authors:  Saeed Noorollahian; Shiva Alavi; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.