Takahiro Himuro1, Shota Tsukamoto2, Yoji Saito2. 1. National Institute of Technology (KOSEN), Kure College, 2-2-11 Agaminami, Kure, Hiroshima 737-8506, Japan. 2. Seikei University, 3-3-1 Kichijoji-Kitamachi, Musashino-shi, Tokyo 180-8633, Japan.
Abstract
In this study, we developed a sensing device that can detect deoxyribonuclease (DNase) based on the electrical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). We estimated the equivalent circuit between the electrodes with immobilized DNA and investigated whether the characteristics of the electrodes change before and after the DNase reaction. This method detects DNase by simply evaluating the electrical properties of DNA without using a fluorescent reagent. Therefore, inexpensive and highly accurate measurements can be performed with simple operations. However, detection sensitivity must be increased for practical feasibility. Hence, we investigated whether DNA immobilization is restricted by changing the shape of the electrode to a triangle with sharp edges, which may improve the sensitivity of DNase. Additionally, we attempted to detect DNase from an extremely small amount of sample solution using a microchannel. The device was able to quantitatively analyze DNase I activity with a detection limit of 5.5 × 10-5 unit/μL. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed sensing device for various medical applications.
In this study, we developed a sensing device that can detect deoxyribonuclease (DNase) based on the electrical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). We estimated the equivalent circuit between the electrodes with immobilized DNA and investigated whether the characteristics of the electrodes change before and after the DNase reaction. This method detects DNase by simply evaluating the electrical properties of DNA without using a fluorescent reagent. Therefore, inexpensive and highly accurate measurements can be performed with simple operations. However, detection sensitivity must be increased for practical feasibility. Hence, we investigated whether DNA immobilization is restricted by changing the shape of the electrode to a triangle with sharp edges, which may improve the sensitivity of DNase. Additionally, we attempted to detect DNase from an extremely small amount of sample solution using a microchannel. The device was able to quantitatively analyze DNase I activity with a detection limit of 5.5 × 10-5 unit/μL. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed sensing device for various medical applications.
Deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA) exhibits excellent molecular recognition
and self-organizing functions, which make it a viable option for constructing
various nanostructures.[1,2] For instance, DNA origami is a
nanostructure created by weaving long single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)
and short ssDNA via self-assembly.[3−6] Additionally, DNA has an electrical conductivity
that relies on the base sequence and environmental conditions.[7−11] It can also bind to specific biomolecules spontaneously.[12,13] These characteristics enable DNA to serve as an effective sensing
material in the medical field.Deoxyribonuclease (DNase) is
an enzyme that nonspecifically hydrolyzes
the phosphodiester bonds of DNA. It exists in the cells and tissues
of living organisms; in body fluids, including blood and urine; on
the human skin surface; in the atmosphere; and in tap water.[14,15] The DNase concentration in blood is being increasingly investigated
as a diagnostic marker owing to its active involvement in specific
diseases, such as myocardial infarction[16,17] and systemic
lupus erythematosus.[18,19] In other words, the development
of DNase measurement sensors can facilitate the early diagnosis of
these diseases. Additionally, studies on DNA, such as genetic manipulation
experiments, have demonstrated that DNase contamination causes major
problems. Therefore, a small sensor for DNase detection can significantly
improve the reliability of DNA-based experiments. One of the conventional
methods for the detection of DNase is the single radial-enzyme-diffusion
method,[17,20] which uses a fluorescent reagent and employs
fluorescence resonance energy transfer.[21] Although these methods are highly sensitive, they present certain
disadvantages, such as a long duration from preparation to detection
and a relatively high cost of the fluorogenic oligonucleotide. Therefore,
an inexpensive and highly accurate DNase measurement sensor with simpler
operations is required. DNase can be electrochemically detected using
ferrocenyloligonucleotide (FcODN)-immobilized electrodes. The FcODN
is immobilized on the electrode through Au-S linkages.[22] DNase I was detected by measuring the oxidation
current with a detection limit of 1 × 10–4 unit/μL.
A highly effective sensing method was recently developed to detect
endonuclease activity using copper nanoparticles as the electrochemical
reporters. This sensor had a wide linear range of 10–3 to 10–1 unit/mL and a limit of detection of 10–3 unit/mL.[23]In this
study, we developed a highly accurate sensing device that
can detect DNase in small volumes using the electrical properties
of DNA. As DNA molecules typically form a complex random coil in solutions,
the molecules must be stretched into a linear shape and immobilized
on a substrate for sensing applications.[24,25] Therefore, we used an electrostatic orientation to immobilize and
stretch the DNA between the two microelectrodes. The behavior of DNA
can be manipulated using the electric-field strength and applied frequency
based on the electrostatic orientation.[10,26,27] Furthermore, DNA can be stretched and immobilized
at arbitrary positions depending on the shape and arrangement of the
electrodes. In a previous study, we investigated the electrical properties
of lambda phage DNA (λDNA) molecules, which were manipulated
by electrostatic orientation, based on their current–voltage
characteristics and complex impedance plots.[28] Additionally, we developed a DNase-detecting device using multiple
λDNA nanowires and performed several experiments using rod-shaped
parallel electrodes.[29] The device comprised
a PDMS reservoir with a volume of 400 μL and two aluminum electrodes.
This method enabled a simple and highly reproducible detection of
DNase without DNA pretreatment or electrode surface modification.
Furthermore, this DNase detection was simpler and faster than that
presented by conventional fluorometric detection methods. Furthermore,
the conductivity of DNA and the properties of the triangular electrodes
were determined through the experimental analysis of DNase detection
using the triangular electrodes.[30] In this
study, we developed a simple method based on a microfluidic channel
that can be precisely handled with extremely small volumes. The microchannel
allows sample small volumes to be filled between electrodes without
requiring micropipettes or other tools to control the volume of the
sample. Therefore, the dead volume of our device is extremely small,
which avoids wastage of the sample and facilitates the conduction
of experiments with minimal sample volume. We also estimated the equivalent
circuit between the triangular electrodes with multiple λDNA
molecules using the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[31−33] and investigated whether the properties between the electrodes change
before and after the DNase treatment. As triangular electrodes facilitate
the immobilization of DNA molecules in a specific location, they are
expected to exhibit more noticeable impedance changes than those exhibited
by parallel electrodes. The experimental results indicate that the
detection sensitivity of DNase can be improved, owing to the limited
immobilization site of DNA molecules.
Materials and Methods
Device
for Electrostatic Orientation
Figure a depicts a schematic of the
device used to detect DNase. This device comprises an aluminum thin-film
electrode fabricated on a glass substrate and a microchannel (50 μm
in depth, 500 μm in width, and 10 mm in length)[28] composed of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, KE-106, Shin-Etsu
Chemical Co., Ltd.). Initially, an aluminum film (thickness of 200
nm) was evaporated on a 30 mm square glass substrate using a vacuum
evaporation system. Subsequently, a photoresist was applied, and ultraviolet
exposure and development were performed. The electrode pattern was
then formed via wet etching. To limit the locations for immobilizing
the DNA molecules, the edges of the electrodes were sharpened. In
this experiment, the electrode gap was set to 14 μm, which was
slightly shorter than the length of DNA (16 μm).
Figure 1
Schematic of the microfluidic
device used for deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA) stretching and immobilization. (a) Bird’s-eye view
of the device before mounting a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannel
on a glass plate with two electrodes. The microchannel is 50 μm
deep, 500 μm wide, and 10 mm long. (b) Top view of the electrodes
and microchannel. Two triangular electrodes were placed 14 μm
apart such that the electrode gap was slightly shorter than the length
of λDNA, which was 16 μm.
Schematic of the microfluidic
device used for deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA) stretching and immobilization. (a) Bird’s-eye view
of the device before mounting a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannel
on a glass plate with two electrodes. The microchannel is 50 μm
deep, 500 μm wide, and 10 mm long. (b) Top view of the electrodes
and microchannel. Two triangular electrodes were placed 14 μm
apart such that the electrode gap was slightly shorter than the length
of λDNA, which was 16 μm.
DNA Immobilization and Electrical Characterization
The DNA
specimens used in this study were the λDNA extracted
from Escherichia coli and procured from Takara Bio
Inc. λDNA is a double-stranded DNA helix that comprises 48,502
base pairs (length 16 μm). A DNA solution (1 nmol/L) was introduced
into the microchannel with a volume of less than 10 μL, and
an alternating current (AC) voltage was applied between the triangular
electrodes to immobilize the λDNA molecules. The formation of
the AC electric field immobilized the λDNA molecules on the
sharp edges of the electrode,[10] and their
electrical properties were evaluated (Figure b). An impedance analyzer (HIOKI, IM3570)
was used for the evaluation. The frequency was varied between 500
Hz and 5 MHz, and the impedance, Z, and phase, θ,
between the electrodes were measured at different frequencies in steps.
The impedance was divided into real and imaginary parts based on these
measured values, and a complex impedance plot of the DNA immobilized
between the electrodes was generated. Subsequently, the equivalent
circuit between the electrodes was estimated using the shape of the
obtained complex impedance plot. The impedance of λDNA was determined
by calculating the appropriate values for each element of the equivalent
circuit.
Optimization of Flow Rate
Typically, the DNA molecules
may peel off from the electrodes when a solution is introduced through
a microchannel at an extremely high speed, regardless of the presence
or absence of DNase. Therefore, we attempted to optimize the flow
rate of the solution using the following procedure.Initially, a λDNA
solution was
introduced into a PDMS microchannel, and an AC voltage of 1 MHz and
20 Vp-p were applied between the two electrodes
using a function generator (TEXIO FGX-295). The AC voltage was applied
for 15 min to stretch and immobilize the λDNA molecules between
the electrodes.Ultrapure
water was then introduced
into the microchannel using an electric syringe pump (Fusion Touch
200, CX07200) to remove the scattered λDNA molecules, which
were not immobilized from the microchannel. Subsequently, the AC voltage
application was terminated.An impedance analyzer (HIOKI, IM3570)
was used to measure the impedance, Z, between the
two electrodes and the phase difference, θ, between the voltage
and current at each frequency. The measurements were performed at
frequencies ranging from 500 Hz to 5 MHz, with an applied potential
of 100 mV.Ultrapure
water was introduced again
into the microchannel at the same flow rate as in Step (2), and Z and θ were measured six times for every 10 min in
1 h from the beginning of immobilization.The impedance value of the immobilized
λDNA molecules was estimated by creating a complex impedance
plot with the Z and θ values measured from
the initiation of DNA immobilization up to 60 min after the washing
with ultrapure water. The frequency of the applied voltage was used
as a parameter.The
impedance change of DNA was evaluated
corresponding to each flow rate, and the decrease rate of conductance
was graphically presented to verify the exfoliation of DNA caused
by the solution operation.
DNase Detection
When DNase was introduced between the
electrodes after immobilizing DNA, λDNA molecules were cleaved
by an enzymatic reaction (Figure ). This reaction changes the impedance between the
electrodes, and the extent of change depends on the concentration
of DNase. In this study, we attempted to detect DNase based on the
electrical characterization between the electrodes before and after
the enzymatic reaction using the following procedure. The concentration
of the DNase solution was adjusted using an appropriate buffer because
DNase I requires Ca2+ and Mg2+ to hydrolyze
double-stranded DNA.
Figure 2
Principle of deoxyribonuclease (DNase) detection using immobilized
lambda phage DNA (λDNA) molecules. (a) The λDNA molecules
are stretched and immobilized between two electrodes via electrostatic
orientations. (b) After DNase treatment, λDNA molecules are
cleaved by the enzymatic reaction and removed from the electrodes.
A λDNA solution was introduced
into a PDMS microchannel, and an AC voltage was applied for 30 min
to stretch and immobilize the λDNA molecules between triangular
electrodes with 12 gaps.The DNA molecules were stretched and
immobilized between the triangular electrodes with 12 gaps using an
electrostatic orientation.The impedance, Z,
and phase difference, θ, were measured, and a complex impedance
plot was generated. After estimating the equivalent circuit, the resistance
component of λDNA molecules before the introduction of DNase
(Rbefore) was calculated.A solution of DNase (Recombinant DNase
I, Takara Bio Inc.) with a concentration in the range of 10–5 to 10–1 unit/μL was introduced into the
microchannel at an optimized flow rate. After the microchannel was
filled with the DNase solution, the device was placed in an incubator
maintained at 37 °C for 30 min.After removing the device from the
incubator, the microchannel was washed with a solution of ultrapure
water for 1 h.The Z and θ
values between the electrodes were then measured once again. The resistance
value of the equivalent circuit after the DNase treatment (Rafter) was determined, and the resistance values
before and after the DNase treatment were compared.Principle of deoxyribonuclease (DNase) detection using immobilized
lambda phage DNA (λDNA) molecules. (a) The λDNA molecules
are stretched and immobilized between two electrodes via electrostatic
orientations. (b) After DNase treatment, λDNA molecules are
cleaved by the enzymatic reaction and removed from the electrodes.
Results and Discussion
In a previous study, we evaluated
the electrical properties before and after DNA immobilization. We
observed that the complex impedance plot before DNA immobilization
consisted of a circular arc, while that after DNA immobilization consisted
of two semicircles, with a semicircle in the high-frequency range
and a circular arc in the low-frequency range.[28] In this experiment, we focused on the diameter of the semicircle
that appeared in the high-frequency range (the real part of the impedance,
i.e., the resistance component). This was used to determine any changes
in the number of DNA immobilized between the electrodes. Figure depicts the impedance
change between the electrodes obtained when DNA was stretched and
immobilized between the 12 sharp electrodes and ultrapure water was
supplied continuously at a flow rate of 1.0 μL/min. This indicates
that the size of the semicircle that appears in the high-frequency
range increases as a function of the liquid transfer time. In the
real part, the resistance value was 760 kΩ immediately after
DNA immobilization, 890 kΩ 30 min after feeding, and 1.7 MΩ
after 1 h. The increase in the resistance value from 30 min to 1 h
indicates that the immobilized DNA molecules were unable to maintain
their state and gradually peeled off between the electrodes at a flow
rate of 1.0 μL/min.
Figure 3
Example of a complex impedance plot between
two electrodes from
a validation experiment of flow rate (flow rate = 1.0 μL/min).
The red circles represent the complex impedance plot obtained from
the immobilized λDNA molecules before supplying the solution.
The blue squares represent the complex impedance plot obtained after
30 min of pumping. The black squares represent the complex impedance
plot obtained after 60 min of pumping. The diameter of the semicircle
observed in the high-frequency range increased with each pumping,
indicating the detachment of λDNA from the electrode.
Example of a complex impedance plot between
two electrodes from
a validation experiment of flow rate (flow rate = 1.0 μL/min).
The red circles represent the complex impedance plot obtained from
the immobilized λDNA molecules before supplying the solution.
The blue squares represent the complex impedance plot obtained after
30 min of pumping. The black squares represent the complex impedance
plot obtained after 60 min of pumping. The diameter of the semicircle
observed in the high-frequency range increased with each pumping,
indicating the detachment of λDNA from the electrode.Furthermore, the flow rate was changed from 0.3
to 5.0 μL/min,
resistance component at the start of liquid feeding (R0) changed after n min of liquid feeding
(R), and increase ratio was determined
to be R/R0. Figure depicts
the relationship between the solution-sending time and impedance-increase
ratio for each flow rate. When the flow rate was 5.0 μL/min,
a large increase was observed in the resistance value of approximately
two times 10 min after the onset of pumping, indicating that the DNA
molecules were detached. Additionally, the resistance value increased
slightly when the liquid feeding operation was performed for 1 h even
at a flow rate of 0.5 μL/min. Conversely, the resistance remained
unchanged at a flow rate of 0.3 μL/min. This analysis indicated
that 0.3 μL/min was the optimal flow rate for operating the
proposed device.
Figure 4
Relationship between the time the solution was sent and
the increase
in the impedance ratio. The increase ratio was calculated as R/R0 using the resistance
component before pumping, R0, and the
resistance after n minutes of pumping, R. The impedance increased by a factor of two within
10 min of pumping at flow rates of 5 and 10 μL/min. The impedance
increased by a factor of two when the pumping operation was performed
for over 60 min even at a flow rate of 1.0 μL/min. The increase
ratio remained at one for the flow rate of 0.3 μL/min, even
after 60 min of pumping, indicating that the impedance remained unchanged.
Relationship between the time the solution was sent and
the increase
in the impedance ratio. The increase ratio was calculated as R/R0 using the resistance
component before pumping, R0, and the
resistance after n minutes of pumping, R. The impedance increased by a factor of two within
10 min of pumping at flow rates of 5 and 10 μL/min. The impedance
increased by a factor of two when the pumping operation was performed
for over 60 min even at a flow rate of 1.0 μL/min. The increase
ratio remained at one for the flow rate of 0.3 μL/min, even
after 60 min of pumping, indicating that the impedance remained unchanged.
Detection of DNase
Following the
immobilization of
the DNA molecules between 12 sharp electrodes, a DNase solution was
introduced at a flow rate of 0.3 μL/min. Typically, when the
immobilized DNA molecules were cleaved by the enzymatic reaction,
the impedance between the electrodes changes according to the number
of cleavages. Therefore, we attempted to quantify the DNase concentration
by analyzing the characteristics of the electrodes before and after
the enzymatic reaction.To determine the stretch/immobilization
of DNA between the electrodes, we observed the λDNA molecules
that were preliminarily labeled with YOYO-1. Figure a presents a fluorescence image of the λDNA
stretched and immobilized between the electrodes in the microchannel.
The stretched λDNA was cleaved by the enzymatic reaction after
the DNase treatment, and a fluorescent image of the curled molecules
was obtained at the tip of the electrode, as shown in Figure b. Figure c illustrates the complex impedance plot
of the immobilized λDNA molecules before and after the DNase
treatment. The red circles represent the complex impedance obtained
before the DNase treatment (after λDNA immobilization) within
the frequency range of 500 Hz to 5 MHz. A small semicircle was observed
in the high-frequency range, and the circular shape of the plot indicates
that the immobilized λDNA molecules comprise resistive and capacitive
components. Therefore, the equivalent circuit includes a parallel
resistance–capacitance circuit, as shown in Figure d. We then used the constant
phase element (CPE), ZCPE, which is a
circuit element, to represent non-ideal capacitive interfacial behaviors.[34−36] The CPE impedance, ZCPE, can be given
aswhere j denotes
an imaginary unit, ω denotes the angular frequency (rad/s), X represents the CPE coefficient (Fs), and p represents the CPE exponent
that takes a value between 0 and 1. The resistive component, Rbefore, which corresponds to the diameter of
the semicircle at higher frequencies, presumably represents the resistance
of the λDNA molecules. The blue square markers in Figure c represent the complex impedances
obtained after the DNase treatment. When the DNase solution was introduced
at a concentration of 10–4 unit/μL, the complex
impedance changed, and the semicircle increased slightly. Comparing
the estimated resistance values of λDNA, the value was determined
to be 400 kΩ after λDNA immobilization and changed to
approximately 1.6 MΩ after introducing the DNase solution. The
dashed and dotted black lines in Figure c represent the fitted curves obtained using
the R-CPE circuit model and the parameter values listed in Table . The value increases
by four times when expressed as an increase ratio (Rafter/Rbefore). This increase
can be attributed to the cleavage of the λDNA molecules immobilized
between the electrodes by DNase, since the liquid transfer operation
does not present a significant effect. In other words, DNase can be
detected by measuring the impedance using a microfluidic device.
Figure 5
Fluorescence
image of λDNA stretched and immobilized between
two electrodes (a) before and (b) after DNase treatment. The λDNA
was labeled with the fluorescence dye, YOYO-1, prior to alignment.
(c) Complex impedance plots and (d, e) equivalent circuits of the
DNase treatment. Red circles represent the complex impedance plot
obtained from the immobilized λDNA molecules before the DNase
treatment. The equivalent circuit after λDNA immobilization
is assumed to be a series connection of two parallel R-CPE circuits.
The resistance value of λDNA (Rbefore) was estimated to be 400 kΩ. Blue squares represent the complex
impedance plot obtained after the DNase treatment with 10–4 unit/μL, which increased the resistance value of DNA (Rafter) to 1.6 MΩ.
Table I
Parameter Values of the R-Constant
Phase Element (CPE) Circuit Model that Were Used for Curve-Fittinga
label
R1 (kΩ)
X1 (Fsp-1)
p1
R2 (MΩ)
X2 (Fsp-1)
p2
before treatment
400
1.0 × 10–11
0.9
70
4.0 × 10–9
0.75
after treatment
1600
3.5 × 10–12
0.98
80
1.5 × 10–9
0.8
X represents the
CPE coefficient, and p represents the CPE exponent
(0 > p > 1). When p = 0 and p = 1, the corresponding CPEs are equivalent to the ideal
resistance and ideal capacitance, respectively.
Fluorescence
image of λDNA stretched and immobilized between
two electrodes (a) before and (b) after DNase treatment. The λDNA
was labeled with the fluorescence dye, YOYO-1, prior to alignment.
(c) Complex impedance plots and (d, e) equivalent circuits of the
DNase treatment. Red circles represent the complex impedance plot
obtained from the immobilized λDNA molecules before the DNase
treatment. The equivalent circuit after λDNA immobilization
is assumed to be a series connection of two parallel R-CPE circuits.
The resistance value of λDNA (Rbefore) was estimated to be 400 kΩ. Blue squares represent the complex
impedance plot obtained after the DNase treatment with 10–4 unit/μL, which increased the resistance value of DNA (Rafter) to 1.6 MΩ.X represents the
CPE coefficient, and p represents the CPE exponent
(0 > p > 1). When p = 0 and p = 1, the corresponding CPEs are equivalent to the ideal
resistance and ideal capacitance, respectively.We were able to successfully obtain
the increased impedance ratio,
which was dependent on the DNase concentration (Figure a), when DNase solutions of various concentrations
were introduced. Their definite correlations in the range of 10–5 to 10–1 units/μL of DNase
concentration demonstrated that the device can be used to quantitatively
analyze DNase. The limit of detection for DNase I was expected to
be 5.5 × 10–5 unit/μL based on the correlations
obtained for DNase I concentrations in the range of 10–5 to 10–4 unit/μL. It was demonstrated that
detection in the 10–5 to 10–4 unit/μL
range is possible for samples with very small volumes (<10 μL).
Furthermore, the increased ratio of the resistance components of the
parallel and triangular electrodes were compared to determine the
detection sensitivity based on the electrode shape. The results indicate
that the triangular electrode generates a higher rate of increase
in all DNase concentrations and improves the measurement sensitivity.
This can be attributed to the smaller number of immobilized λDNA
molecules observed when the triangular electrode was used (Figure b). The corresponding
impedance change associated with the DNA cleavage was larger. In future
experiments, the impedance change before and after serum introduction
must be analyzed using serum from venous blood separated by centrifugation
based on previously reported demonstration experiments.[37] Furthermore, the electrical properties of the
double-stranded M13mp18 DNA (which contains 7249 base pairs) have
already been analyzed and can be simulated using an equivalent circuit
model similar to that of λDNA.[38] Comparison
experiments must be performed between M13mp18 DNA and λDNA to
determine the detection limits of the DNA probes.
Figure 6
(a) Relationship between
the deoxyribonuclease (DNase) concentration
and increased impedance ratio. Red circles represent the relationship
between the DNase concentration and increase ratio obtained from the
triangular electrodes. The open circle on the ordinate represents
the increase ratio in the absence of DNase I. The blue triangle represents
the increase ratio obtained from the parallel electrodes. (b) Comparative
images of λDNA stretched and immobilized between the triangular
electrodes and the parallel electrodes. The parallel electrodes could
not detect impedance changes at DNase concentrations smaller than
the 10–4 unit/μL level. When the triangular
electrodes were used, an increased ratio by a factor of two times
approximately was obtained even at the 10–5 unit/μL
level. The standard deviation for the increased impedance ratio of
the λDNA molecules was less than 20%, indicating that the immobilized
λDNA molecules can be used for DNase detection.
(a) Relationship between
the deoxyribonuclease (DNase) concentration
and increased impedance ratio. Red circles represent the relationship
between the DNase concentration and increase ratio obtained from the
triangular electrodes. The open circle on the ordinate represents
the increase ratio in the absence of DNase I. The blue triangle represents
the increase ratio obtained from the parallel electrodes. (b) Comparative
images of λDNA stretched and immobilized between the triangular
electrodes and the parallel electrodes. The parallel electrodes could
not detect impedance changes at DNase concentrations smaller than
the 10–4 unit/μL level. When the triangular
electrodes were used, an increased ratio by a factor of two times
approximately was obtained even at the 10–5 unit/μL
level. The standard deviation for the increased impedance ratio of
the λDNA molecules was less than 20%, indicating that the immobilized
λDNA molecules can be used for DNase detection.
Conclusions
In this study, we fabricated a microdevice
for detecting DNase
by immobilizing λDNA molecules between two triangular electrodes.
When the concentration of DNase was 10–4 unit/μL,
an impedance-increase rate of approximately four times was obtained
after the DNase treatment. Furthermore, a definite correlation between
the DNase concentration and increased impedance ratio was obtained.
This result can be applied to the quantitative analyses of DNase.
Moreover, the difference in the increased impedance ratio was investigated
based on the shape of the electrode. We observed that the detection
sensitivity of DNase improved when the immobilization site of DNA
was restricted. In future, the proposed device can be used as a simple
DNase sensing kit prior to genetic research experiments or can be
mounted on ultrapure water production systems for genetic research.
Authors: Svetlana N Tamkovich; Anna V Cherepanova; Elena V Kolesnikova; Elena Y Rykova; Dmitrii V Pyshnyi; Valentin V Vlassov; Pavel P Laktionov Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Anna V Cherepanova; Svetlana N Tamkovich; Olga E Bryzgunova; Valentin V Vlassov; Pavel P Laktionov Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.691