| Literature DB >> 35846997 |
Pallavi Kurra1, Kishore Narra2, Raha Orfali3, Srinivasa Babu Puttugunta1, Shah Alam Khan4, Dhanalekshmi Unnikrishnan Meenakshi4, Arul Prakash Francis5, Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq6, Mohd Imran7.
Abstract
The present work investigates a blend of jack fruit mucilage (JFM) and okra mucilage (OKM) as promising mucoadhesive carriers for colon-specific delivery of a curcumin (CMN)-loaded mucoadhesive tablet (CMT) formulation. Formulation optimization was performed using central composite design (CCD) to further decipher the effect of varying proportions of the mucoadhesive carriers JFM and OKG on response factors such as drug release (% DR) and mucoadhesive strength (MA). The optimized formulation CMT (F14) demonstrated a favorable 54.35% in vitro release of CMN in 12 h with release kinetics resulting from a zero-order anomalous diffusion mechanism and MA of 34.1733 ± 1.26 g. Accelerated stability testing of CMT (F14) confirmed a shelf life of about 4.7 years. In vivo drug targeting studies performed using rabbit models in order to observe transit behavior (colon-specific delivery) of the dosage form were assessed by fluoroscopic images of the GI tract. Taking the results together, the results confirm that the combination of JFM and OKM could be exploited as an ideal mucoadhesive carrier for effective delivery of macromolecules to the colon.Entities:
Keywords: Curcumin; jack fruit; mucilage; mucoadhesive; okra gum
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846997 PMCID: PMC9284007 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.902207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Illustration of the setup used for the estimation of the Washburn slope.
Composition of various CMN mucoadhesive tablet formulations.
| Formulation code | CSD (mg) | JFM (mg) | OKM (mg) | Dicalcium phosphate (mg) | Magnesium stearate (mg) | Talc (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 115 | 200 | 64.645 | 150.856 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M2 | 115 | 200 | 100 | 115.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M3 | 115 | 250 | 125 | 40.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M4 | 115 | 200 | 135.35 | 80.145 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M5 | 115 | 200 | 100 | 115.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M6 | 115 | 200 | 100 | 115.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M7 | 115 | 150 | 125 | 140.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M8 | 115 | 150 | 75 | 190.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M9 | 115 | 270.71 | 100 | 44.789 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M10 | 115 | 129.29 | 100 | 186.211 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M11 | 115 | 250 | 75 | 90.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M12 | 115 | 200 | 100 | 115.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
| M13 | 115 | 200 | 100 | 115.5 | 9.75 | 9.75 |
FIGURE 2SEM images of (A) CMN and (B) CSDs prepared with PVP K 30 (1:3 ratio).
FIGURE 3Washburn graph displaying the slopes of CMN pure drug and 1:3 ratio CSDs prepared with PVP K30.
Response variables of CMN mucoadhesive tablet.
| Formulation code | JFM (mg) factor A | OKM (mg) factor B | % CDR | MA (gm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 200 | 64.6447 | 63 ± 1.17 | 27 ± 0.17 |
| M2 | 200 | 100 | 76 ± 1.38 | 23 ± 0.28 |
| M3 | 250 | 125 | 43 ± 0.20 | 33 ± 0.94 |
| M4 | 200 | 135.355 | 78 ± 1.18 | 23 ± 0.29 |
| M5 | 200 | 100 | 78 ± 1.13 | 28 ± 1.76 |
| M6 | 200 | 100 | 73 ± 1.17 | 20 ± 1.45 |
| M7 | 150 | 125 | 88 ± 1.23 | 26 ± 1.34 |
| M8 | 150 | 75 | 93 ± 1.82 | 33 ± 1.64 |
| M9 | 270.711 | 100 | 49 ± 0.19 | 37 ± 0.58 |
| M10 | 129.289 | 100 | 97 ± 1.50 | 27 ± 0.71 |
| M11 | 250 | 75 | 68 ± 0.39 | 29 ± 0.68 |
| M12 | 200 | 100 | 77 ± 0.098 | 39 ± 1.51 |
| M13 | 200 | 100 | 74 ± 0.082 | 19 ± 1.76 |
| M14 | 250.95 | 124.96 | 54.35 ± 2.13 | 34.17 |
FIGURE 43D response surface plots showing the combined effect of JFM-OKM on (A) % CDR at 12 h and (B) MA.
Post-compression properties of mucoadhesive tablets.
| Formulation | Weight variation (mg) | Friability (%) | Content uniformity | Swelling index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH 1.2 | pH 7.4 | ||||
| M1 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 0.034 ± 0.001 | 99.18 ± 0.12 | 2.23 ± 0.1 | 18.3 ± 0.8 |
| M2 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 0.043 ± 0.001 | 99.13 ± 0.13 | 3.15 ± 0.1 | 25.6 ± 0.1 |
| M3 | 1.09 ± 0.03 | 0.054 ± 0.001 | 99.23 ± 0.15 | 3.62 ± 0.1 | 34.3 ± 0.4 |
| M4 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 0.051 ± 0.001 | 99.19 ± 0.13 | 2.99 ± 0.1 | 35.6 ± 0.3 |
| M5 | 1.03 ± 0.03 | 0.012 ± 0.001 | 99.13 ± 0.26 | 3.18 ± 0.1 | 26.3 ± 0.7 |
| M6 | 1.04 ± 0.01 | 0.065 ± 0.001 | 99.26 ± 0.17 | 3.72 ± 0.1 | 25.3 ± 0.3 |
| M7 | 1.11 ± 0.02 | 0.055 ± 0.001 | 99.32 ± 0.14 | 3.66 ± 0.1 | 19.5 ± 0.7 |
| M8 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 0.072 ± 0.001 | 99.49 ± 0.22 | 3.82 ± 0.1 | 17.8 ± 0.2 |
| M9 | 1.07 ± 0.03 | 0.071 ± 0.001 | 99.37 ± 0.19 | 3.69 ± 0.1 | 29.2 ± 0.3 |
| M10 | 1.04 ± 0.05 | 0.063 ± 0.001 | 99.26 ± 0.14 | 3.29 ± 0.1 | 27.6 ± 0.4 |
| M11 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 0.070 ± 0.001 | 99.29 ± 0.16 | 3.88 ± 0.1 | 27.5 ± 0.5 |
| M12 | 1.09 ± 0.01 | 0.024 ± 0.001 | 99.16 ± 0.17 | 3.89 ± 0.1 | 26.2 ± 0.2 |
| M13 | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 0.032 ± 0.001 | 99.43 ± 0.13 | 3.77 ± 0.1 | 25.2 ± 0.3 |
*data are presented as mean ± SD of triplicate test values.
FIGURE 5DSC thermograms [A-pure CMN and B-Optimized CMT (M14)].
FIGURE 6Comparative dissolution profile of M14 formulation in simulated GI fluid pH buffer media (in vitro dissolution data/drug release) and media containing 2% rat colon contents (ex vivo dissolution data/drug release). Error bars represent the standard deviation of n = 3.
FIGURE 7Hemolytic assay for negative control, positive control, and test samples (T1–T5). Error bars represent the standard deviation of n = 3.
FIGURE 8(A) First-order degradation kinetics plot for CMN mucoadhesive tablet formulation (M14) (B) Arrhenius plot for CMN colon-targeted tablet (M14).
FIGURE 9X-ray images of CMN colon targeting studies after administration of M14 mucoadhesive tablet formulation. The tablet remained intact in the gastric and upper intestinal region, On the other hand swelling and distortion in the shape of the tablet were observed in the colonic region.