| Literature DB >> 25093165 |
Rashmi Sareen1, Kavita Nath1, Nitin Jain1, K L Dhar1.
Abstract
The present study was aimed to develop and optimize the microsponges of curcumin for colon specific drug delivery in a view to bypass the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) for enhanced therapeutic effect. Microsponges were developed by quasi emulsion solvent diffusion method using 3(2) full factorial design. Prepared microsponges were optimized in order to analyze the effects of independent variables (volume of ethanol and Eudragit L100) on the encapsulation efficiency, particle size, and drug release. The optimized formulation was subjected to in vivo study using acetic acid induced colitis model in rats. The F7 was selected as optimized formulation based on particle size of 41.63 μm, % entrapment efficiency of 78.13%, and % cumulative drug release of 84.12%, and desirability factor of 0.83. Release studies revealed that microsponges prevented the premature release of curcumin in upper GIT and specifically released the drug at colonic pH. The drug release profile of F7 formulation was subjected to different kinetic models and based upon the best correlation coefficient (r(2) = 0.9927) the release was found to follow Higuchi model, which suggested diffusion as the main mechanism of drug release. Pharmacodynamic study showed that curcumin loaded microsponges causes a significant decrease in edema, necrosis, and hemorrhage of colon as compared to free curcumin. This study proves that curcumin loaded microsponges may act as a promising drug delivery system for treatment of ulcerative colitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25093165 PMCID: PMC4100342 DOI: 10.1155/2014/340701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Disadvantages of various curcumin colon targeted formulations.
| Formulation | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Guar-gum based tablet | Single unit system has disadvantage of unintentional disintegration of tablet in GIT, which may lead to compromised systemic bioavailability. |
|
| |
| Microspheres and nanoparticles | Microspheres and nanoparticles are comparatively nonporous in nature and have less capability to bind to the rough surface of intestinal mucosa as compared to microsponges particles. |
32 factorial design for preparing curcumin loaded microsponges.
| Formulations | Drug | PVA | Eudragit | Ethanol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 800 | 5 | 400 | 5 |
| F2 | 800 | 5 | 600 | 5 |
| F3 | 800 | 5 | 800 | 5 |
| F4 | 800 | 5 | 400 | 6 |
| F5 | 800 | 5 | 600 | 6 |
| F6 | 800 | 5 | 800 | 6 |
| F7 | 800 | 5 | 400 | 7 |
| F8 | 800 | 5 | 600 | 7 |
| F9 | 800 | 5 | 800 | 7 |
| F10∗ | 800 | 5 | 700 | 6.5 |
*Extra design checkpoint.
Compilation of various evaluation parameters for curcumin microsponge formulations.
| Formulation code | Particle size* | EE (%)* | PY (%)* | DL (%)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 51.06 ± 0.15 | 70.36 ± 1.23 | 87.26 ± 0.42 | 37.71 ± 0.22 |
| F2 | 54.44 ± 0.96 | 68.75 ± 0.98 | 88.89 ± 0.92 | 40.18 ± 0.56 |
| F3 | 57.59 ± 0.55 | 66.12 ± 1.96 | 74.45 ± 0.74 | 45.36 ± 0.74 |
| F4 | 50.14 ± 0.71 | 76.61 ± 0.84 | 86.13 ± 1.55 | 69.45 ± 0.98 |
| F5 | 52.95 ± 0.22 | 74.85 ± 0.56 | 86.39 ± 1.78 | 40.33 ± 1.20 |
| F6 | 55.29 ± 0.81 | 71.19 ± 1.10 | 80.44 ± 0.71 | 64.45 ± 0.77 |
| F7 | 41.63 ± 0.25 | 78.13 ± 1.45 | 80.15 ± 0.84 | 66.94 ± 0.68 |
| F8 | 45.62 ± 0.69 | 76.74 ± 0.73 | 84.72 ± 0.58 | 47.69 ± 1.73 |
| F9 | 47.23 ± 0.74 | 72.58 ± 2.31 | 71.49 ± 1.19 | 39.89 ± 0.84 |
*n = 3, mean ± S.D.
Figure 1SEM photomicrograph of curcumin microsponges.
Figure 2(a) Comparative dissolution profile of curcumin loaded microsponges (F1–F9). (b) In vitro release profile of F7 with and without RCC.
Figure 33D bar surface chart depicting the influence of independent variables over dependent variables.
Macroscopic evaluation of colonic lesions of rat.
| Colonic erosion score* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups |
|
|
|
|
|
| Control | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Curcumin | — | 1 | 3 | 1 | — |
| Curcumin microsponges | — | 3 | 2 | — | — |
*n = 5 in each group; 0 = normal colored colon, 0.5 = red coloration, 1 = spot ulcer, 1.5 = hemorrhagic streaks, and 2 = hemorrhagic ulcer.
Figure 4Histology of colonic section of (a) normal group, (b) acetic acid induced colitis group, (c) curcumin treated group, and (d) curcumin loaded microsponges treated group.
Figure 5FTIR spectra depicting stability of developed formulation.