Literature DB >> 35846414

A Prospective Pilot Study Investigating Performance of 18F-Fluciclovine PET Imaging for Detection of Prostate Cancer 2 Years Following Primary Partial Gland Cryoablation.

Azadeh Nazemi1, William C Huang1, James Wysock1, Samir S Taneja1, Kent Friedman2, Rozalba Gogaj1, Herbert Lepor1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of partial gland ablation (PGA) is to eradicate focal lesions of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) with minimal adverse impact on functional outcomes. The primary objective of this study is to characterize the performance of 18F-Fluciclovine PET imaging for detection of prostate cancer following PGA. Materials and
Methods: Subjects 2 years following primary partial gland cryoablation (PPGCA) were invited to participate in an IRB-approved study providing they met the following inclusion criteria: a single reported mpMRI region of interest (ROI) concordant with biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) < 4, no gross extra-prostatic extension on mpMRI, and no GGG > 1 or GGG 1 with a core length > 6 mm on contralateral systematic biopsy. 18F-Fluciclovine PET MRI imaging of the prostate was performed followed by in and out-of-field biopsies.
Results: Twenty-seven men who met eligibility criteria participated in the prospective study. In-field and out-of-field csPCa recurrence rate was 7.4% and 22.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of mpMRI and PET imaging did not reach performance to reliably inform who should undergo prostate biopsy.
Conclusion: At 2 years following PPGCA, the rate of in-field csPCa was exceedingly low indicating a limited role for imaging to inform in-field biopsy decisions. The csPCa detection rate of out-of-field recurrence was 22% which provides an opportunity for imaging to inform out-of-field biopsy decisions. Based on our findings, 18F-Fluciclovine PET MRI cannot be used to inform who should undergo out-of-field prostate biopsy at 2 years following PPGCA.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryoablation; Fluciclovine; Focal therapy; PET imaging; Prostate cancer

Year:  2022        PMID: 35846414      PMCID: PMC9276896          DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00755-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1869-3474


  11 in total

1.  Utility of Multiparametric MRI for Predicting Residual Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Focal Laser Ablation.

Authors:  Ely R Felker; Steven S Raman; David S K Lu; Mitch Tuttle; Daniel J Margolis; Fuad F ElKhoury; James Sayre; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  3-T multiparametric MRI characteristics of prostate cancer patients suspicious for biochemical recurrence after primary focal cryosurgery (hemiablation).

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Corinne C Liu; Kaitlin E Kosinski; David J Habibian; Anthony T Corcoran; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Early oncological control following partial gland cryo-ablation: a prospective experience specifying reflex MRI guided biopsy of the ablation zone.

Authors:  James Steven Wysock; Ezequiel Becher; Rozalba Gogaj; Nermarie Velazquez; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  Two-year Outcomes Following Focal Laser Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Brian Chao; Elton Llukani; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-15

5.  The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Oncological Control Among Candidates for Focal Ablation of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander P Kenigsberg; Elton Llukani; Fang-Ming Deng; Jonathan Melamed; Ming Zhou; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Focal Ablation of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor; Samuel Gold; James Wysock
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

7.  Focal Therapy in Primary Localised Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2018.

Authors:  Henk G van der Poel; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Erik Briers; Philip Cornford; Alex Govorov; Ann M Henry; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Olivier Rouvière; Maria De Santis; Peter-Paul M Willemse; Hendrik van Poppel; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Oncological control following partial gland ablation for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ezequiel Becher; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Louise C Brown; Rhian Gabe; Richard Kaplan; Mahesh K Parmar; Yolanda Collaco-Moraes; Katie Ward; Richard G Hindley; Alex Freeman; Alex P Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Massimo Valerio; Yannick Cerantola; Scott E Eggener; Herbert Lepor; Thomas J Polascik; Arnauld Villers; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.