Literature DB >> 31100236

Two-year Outcomes Following Focal Laser Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer.

Brian Chao1, Elton Llukani1, Herbert Lepor2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding how to assess oncological control following focal ablation of prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To assess quality of life and in-field recurrence following focal laser ablation (FLA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 34 men participating in a prospective outcomes study following FLA, 32 underwent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 mo and 2 yr. All underwent assessment of urinary and sexual function at 1 yr. INTERVENTION: FLA and MRI-targeted biopsy of the ablation zone. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The American Urological Association Symptom Score and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men at baseline and 12 mo were compared using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a significance level of p=0.05. The percentage of positive and negative in-field biopsies was calculated for suspicious and nonsuspicious post-ablation MRI scans. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: FLA was associated with no adverse impact on urinary or sexual function. For men with suspicious MRI (MRI+) findings, in-field disease recurrence of intermediate and low risk disease was detected in 75% and 25% of cases, respectively. For men with nonsuspicious MRI (MRI-) findings, in-field disease recurrence of intermediate- and low-risk disease was detected in 22.4% and 50% of cases, respectively. The change in PSA from baseline did not discriminate cases with MRI- findings with and without cancer at 2 yr.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI reliably identifies in-field recurrence of only intermediate-risk prostate cancer at 2 yr after FLA. A biopsy of the ablation zone must be performed for MRI+ findings. The decision to perform an ablation-zone biopsy for men with MRI- scans should be influenced by whether detection of low-risk disease would influence management. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Our study provides compelling evidence that men should undergo interval magnetic resonance imaging to assess the probability of intermediate-risk disease in the ablation zone following focal laser ablation of localized prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focal laser ablation; Focal therapy; Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer treatment outcomes; Prostate magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31100236     DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol        ISSN: 2588-9311


  7 in total

1.  Utility of Multiparametric MRI for Predicting Residual Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Focal Laser Ablation.

Authors:  Ely R Felker; Steven S Raman; David S K Lu; Mitch Tuttle; Daniel J Margolis; Fuad F ElKhoury; James Sayre; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Current state of image-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa; Bradford J Wood; Andre Luis Abreu; Bruno Nahar; Toshitaka Shin; Selcuk Guven; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A Prospective Pilot Study Investigating Performance of 18F-Fluciclovine PET Imaging for Detection of Prostate Cancer 2 Years Following Primary Partial Gland Cryoablation.

Authors:  Azadeh Nazemi; William C Huang; James Wysock; Samir S Taneja; Kent Friedman; Rozalba Gogaj; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Akira Kawashima; Krzysztof R Gorny; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Comparative Effectiveness of Radiotherapy versus Focal Laser Ablation in Patients with Low and Intermediate Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Xianghong Zhou; Kun Jin; Shi Qiu; Di Jin; Xinyang Liao; Xiang Tu; Xiaonan Zheng; Jiakun Li; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Focal therapy for primary and salvage prostate cancer treatment: a narrative review.

Authors:  Andrew T Tracey; Lucas M Nogueira; Ricardo G Alvim; Jonathan A Coleman; Katie S Murray
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07

7.  Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following focal ablation with irreversible electroporation: feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandar Blazevski; William Gondoputro; Matthijs J Scheltema; Amer Amin; Bart Geboers; Daniela Barreto; Anne-Maree Haynes; Ron Shnier; Warick Delprado; Shikha Agrawal; James E Thompson; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.