| Literature DB >> 35846052 |
Alaa Efat1, Rana Wahb1, Sabry Abd Allah Shoeib1, Ashraf Abd ElRaof Dawod2, Mohamad Ahmed Abd ElHafez1, Essam Ali Abd ElMohsen3, Aly Elkholy1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To study serum growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) serum level in β-thalassemia patients and its relation to carotid intima-media thickness.Entities:
Keywords: CIMT; GDF‐15; transfusion‐dependent beta‐thalassemic adults
Year: 2022 PMID: 35846052 PMCID: PMC9175794 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJHaem ISSN: 2688-6146
Comparison between patients and controls regarding demographic, clinical, and hematological variables (n = 90)
| Variable | Cases | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 27.17 ± 5.75 | 28 ± 5.81 | 0.520 |
|
| |||
| Male | 23(38.3%) | 15(50%) | 0.291 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 159.02 ± 8.67 | 167.7 ± 6.5 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 23.05 ± 2.59 | 24.36 ± 2.6 | 0.026 |
|
| |||
| Yes | 10 (16.7%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0.188 |
|
| |||
| Yes | 6 (10%) | 0 (0%) | 0.073 |
|
| |||
| Yes | 38 (63.3%) | 16 (53.3%) | 0.361 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 7.87 ± 1.01 | 12 ± 1.41 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Median | 15 | 7.75 | <0.001 |
| Range | 5.3–72 | 4–12 | |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 565.47 ± 231.5 | 305.4 ± 56.43 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 2.03 ± 0.79 | 1.02 ± 0.32 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Median | 2265 | 35 | <0.001 |
| Range | 150–10441 | 19–37 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 75.5 | 30.19 | <0.001 |
| Range | 21–119 | 10–48 | |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 77.38 ± 9.29 | 85.83 ± 7.43 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Median | 60 | 26.5 | <0.001 |
| Range | 18–278 | 17–40 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 40 | 25 | <0.001 |
| Range | 11–225 | 15–50 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 2.4 | 0.9 | <0.001 |
| Range | 1.2–9 | 0.5–1.2 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 0.4 | 0.3 | <0.001 |
| Range | 0.2–1.8 | 0.1–0.8 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 1.9 | 0.6 | <0.001 |
| Range | 1–7.2 | 0.4 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.775 |
| Range | 0.3–1.3 | 0.3–0.9 | |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 8.01 ± 0.97 | 9.04 ± 0.54 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 3.73 ± 0.3 | 4.22 ± 0.51 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 5.52 ± 1.37 | 4.5 ± 0.82 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 216.65 ± 49.78 | 103.73 ± 14.86 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Median | 123.5 | 92.5 | 0.001 |
| Range | 49–337 | 51–139 | |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 179.99 ± 30.93 | 85.19 ± 12.59 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 35.22 ± 6.86 | 54.28 ± 10.26 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 92.2 ± 31.81 | 87.97 ± 7.13 | 0.333 |
|
| |||
| Median | 3.35 | 1.73 | 0.001 |
| Range | 0.23–35.4 | 3–3.39 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 0.54 | 0.8 | 0.137 |
| Range | 0–2.87 | 0.4–1 | |
|
| |||
| Positive | 3(5%) | 0(0%) | 0.111 |
|
| |||
| Positive | 17(28.3%) | 0(0%) | 0.001 |
|
| |||
| Median | 0.08 | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| Range | 0.05–0.2 | 0.03–0.05 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 0.08 | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| Range | 0.04–0.2 | 0.03–0.05 | |
|
| |||
| Median | 1839.89 | 256.14 | <0.001 |
| Range | 1100–3641 | 108–495.28 | |
|
| |||
| Splenectomy | 42 (70%) | 0 (0%) | <0.001 |
| Splenomegaly | 18 (30%) | 0 (0%) | |
|
| |||
| Yes | 2 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.551 |
| No | 58 (96.7%) | 30 (100%) | |
|
| |||
| Yes | 34 (56.7%) | 0 (0%) | <0.001 |
| No | 26 (43.3%) | 30 (100%) | |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 30.12 ± 9.7 | 15.132 ± 2.9 | <0.001 |
Note: p < 0.001 is statistically highly significant and p < 0.05 is statistically significant.
@Spearman's correlation.
TLC : total leucocyte count; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; Hs CRP: high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein; HDL: high‐density lipoproteins; CIMT: carotid intimal media thickness; HOMA‐IR score: homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; PC: prothrombin concentration; LDL: low‐density lipoproteins; FBS: fasting blood sugar; UA: uric acid.
Correlation between carotid artery intima media thickness and other variables of the patients
| Variables | Right CIMT | Left CIMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| 0.037 | 0.780 | 0.127 | 0.335 |
|
| 0.178 | 0.173 | 0.103 | 0.435 |
|
| 0.006 | 0.963 | 0.031 | 0.817 |
|
| 0.084 | 0.525 | 0.056 | 0.673 |
|
| 0.013 | 0.919 | 0.14 | 0.919 |
|
| 0.045 | 0.733 | 0.108 | 0.441 |
|
| 0.225 | 0.03* | 0.229 | 0.03* |
|
| –0.053 | 0.686 | –0.013 | 0.323 |
|
| 0.252 | 0.001* | 0.367 | <0.001* |
|
| 0.27 | 0.001 | 0.427 | <0.001* |
|
| –0.074 | 0.575 | –0.079 | 0.547 |
|
| 0.106 | 0.420 | 0.121 | 0.355 |
|
| 0.013 | 0.919 | 0.016 | 0.93 |
|
| –0.070 | 0.597 | –0.037 | 0.780 |
|
| 0.012 | 0.930 | 0.007 | 0.957 |
|
| 0.391 | 0.003* | 0.371 | 0.004* |
|
| 0.186 | 0.155 | 0.109 | 0.409 |
|
| 0.403 | <0.001 | 0.328 | 0.011* |
|
| 0.006 | 0.964 | 0.036 | 0.785 |
|
| 0.335 | 0.001* | 0.667 | <0.001* |
|
| –0.306 | 0.003* | –0.491 | <0.001* |
|
| 0.139 | 0.294 | 0.093 | 0.484 |
|
| 0.117 | 0.372 | 0.06 | 0.645 |
|
| 0.134 | 0.306 | 0.052 | 0.695 |
|
| 0.903 | <0.001** | 0.817 | <0.001** |
|
| 0.321 | 0.012 | 0.326 | 0.011 |
|
| –0.321 | 0.012 | –0.350 | 0.006 |
Note: rs is Spearman's correlation.
* significant.
** highly significant.
Correlation between GDF15 level and other variables of the patients
| Variables | GDF15 | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.045 | 0.732 |
|
| 0.063 | 0.631 |
|
| 0.11 | 0.399 |
|
| 0.061 | 0.644 |
|
| 0.073 | 0.577 |
|
| 0.018 | 0.890 |
|
| –0.064 | 0.629 |
|
| –0.090 | 0.492 |
|
| 0.011 | 0.931 |
|
| 0.047 | 0.722 |
|
| –0.157 | 0.232 |
|
| 0.059 | 0.653 |
|
| 0.141 | 0.282 |
|
| 0.148 | 0.259 |
|
| 0.130 | 0.323 |
|
| 0.063 | 0.136 |
|
| –0.066 | 0.619 |
|
| 0.133 | 0.311 |
|
| 0.365 | 0.004* |
|
| 0.033 | 0.801 |
|
| 0.083 | 0.530 |
|
| 0.143 | 0.274 |
|
| 0.207 | 0.116 |
|
| 0.229 | 0.078 |
|
| 0.098 | 0.456 |
|
| 0.315 | 0.014 |
|
| –0.340 | 0.008 |
* significant.
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the optimal cutoff of CIMT and GDF15 levels
| Cutoff point | AUC | Sensitivity% | Specificity% |
| 95%CI(lower–upper) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDF‐15 level | |||||
| ≥1446.01 | 0.962 | 88% | 90% | <0.001** | 0.915–1 |
** highly significant.
FIGURE 1Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of the optimal cutoff of CIMT and GDF15 levels. Blood GDF‐15 levels classified into three categories: normal (<1200 pg/ml), moderately elevated (1200–1800 pg/ml), and highly elevated (>1800 pg/ml) [35]
Univariate analysis for variables associated with CIMT in thalassemic patients (n = 60)
| Predictors | Odds ratio | 95% CI (lower–upper) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (≥27 years) | 1.825 | 0.565–5.895 | 0.314 |
| Sex (male) | 1.706 | 0.597–4.876 | 0.319 |
| Smoking (yes) | 5.524 | 1.063–28.708 | 0.042* |
| Family history of premature CAD (yes) | 0.9 | 0.315–2.574 | 0.844 |
| Hypertension (yes) | 1.077 | 0.199–5.819 | 0.931 |
| BMI (≥23 kg/m2) | 0.867 | 0.314–2.393 | 0.782 |
| Hb (>7.87 g/dl) | 1.495 | 0.540–4.136 | 0.439 |
| Serum ferritin (≥2265) | 3.519 | 1.209–10.240 | 0.021* |
| Transferrin saturation % (≥75) | 1.962 | 0.702–5.479 | 0.199 |
| Cholesterol (≥216.65) | 3.077 | 1.064–8.899 | 0.038* |
| Triglycerides (≥123.5) | 1.143 | 0.415–3.148 | 0.796 |
| LDL (≥179.99) | 3.594 | 1.147–11.256 | 0.28* |
| HDL (≥35.22) | 0.289 | 0.1–0.834 | 0.022* |
| hs CRP (≥3.35) | 0.510 | 0.183–1.424 | 0.199 |
| HOMA‐IR (≥0.54) | 1.962 | 0.702–5.479 | 0.199 |
| Spleen (splenectomy) | 0.909 | 0.301–2.744 | 0.866 |
| Blood transfusion (monthly) | 4.767 | 1.171–19.396 | 0.029* |
| Regular ICA therapy | 0.1 | 0.01–0.742 | 0.026* |
| GDF‐15 (pg/ml) (≥1839.89) | 58.5 | 11.919–278.120 | <0.001** |
* significant.
** highly significant.
multivariate analysis for variables significantly associated with increased CIMT in thalassemic patients (n = 60)
| Predictors | Odds ratio | 95% CI (lower‐upper) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking (yes) | 2.734 | 0.440–16.990 | 0.281 |
| Serum ferritin (≥2265) | 4.312 | 1.116–16.656 | 0.034* |
| Cholesterol (≥216.65) | 3.114 | 0.795–12.199 | 0.103 |
| LDL (≥179.99) | 3.875 | 0.929–16.168 | 0.063 |
| HDL (≥35.22) | 0.74 | 0.591–0.832 | 0.013* |
| Blood transfusion dependency (monthly) | 2.771 | 0.455–16.856 | 0.269 |
| Regular ICA therapy (yes) | 0.36 | 0.017–4.362 | 0.174 |
| GDF15 (pg/ml) (≥1839.89) | 62.143 | 5.780–66.166 | 0.001* |
* significant.