| Literature DB >> 35845714 |
Thi Thao Ngo1, Thinh Huy Tran1,2,3, Thanh Dat Ta1, Thi Phuong Le1, Phuoc Dung Nguyen1, Mai Anh Tran1, The-Hung Bui1,4, Thanh Van Ta1,2,3, Van Khanh Tran1.
Abstract
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common enzyme disorder and is caused by G6PD gene mutations. To date, more than 400 variants in the G6PD gene have been discovered, and about 160 identified variants are associated with a significant decrease in the G6PD enzyme activity. However, the molecular characterization and epidemiological study of G6PD deficiency are still limited in Vietnam. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the G6PD variants among the Vietnamese populations and evaluate their correlation to G6PD enzyme activity. A total of 339 patients (302 males and 37 females) were enrolled in this study. The G6PD variants were identified by Sanger sequencing. Our results indicate that males are more severely deficient in G6PD than females. This enzyme activity in males (1.27 ± 1.06 IU/g·Hb) is significantly lower than in females (2.98 ± 1.57 IU/g·Hb) (p < 0.0001). The enzyme activity of the heterozygous-homozygous females and heterozygous females-hemizygous males was found to be significantly different (p < 0.05), which is interpreted due to random X-inactivation. For G6PD molecular characteristics, Viangchan (c.871G>A), Canton (c.1376G>T) and Kaiping (c.1388G>A) variants were the most dominant, accounting for 24.48%, 17.70%, and 22.42%, respectively, whereas the highest frequency of complex variants was observed in Viangchan/Silent with 20.35%. In terms of G6PD activity, the Union variant presented the lowest mean value (1.03 IU/g·Hb) compared to the other variants (p < 0.05). Computational analysis using Polyphen-2 tool investigated that all variants were relative to G6PD deficiency and separated the levels as benign and damaged. The result will establish effective methods to screen G6PD variants in Vietnam.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35845714 PMCID: PMC9277213 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2653089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anemia ISSN: 2090-1267
Participant characteristics in this study.
| Male | Female |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| <1 month | 244 (71.98) | 24 (7.08) | 268 (79.06) | 0.0089 |
| 1–6months | 50 (14.75) | 9 (2.61) | 59 (17.41) | |
| >6–12 months | 5 (1.48) | 1 (0.29) | 6 (1.77) | |
| >12–24 months | 1 (0.29) | 2 (0.59) | 3 (0.88) | |
| >24 months | 2 (0.59) | 1 (0.29) | 3 (0.88) | |
| N |
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Average | 1.27 ± 1.06 | 2.98 ± 1.57 | <0.0001 | |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| High (<0.6 U/g·Hb | 78 (23.01) | 1 (0.29) | 79 (23.30) | <0.0001 |
| Medium (0.6–3.6 IU/g·Hb) | 212 (62.54) | 21 (6.20) | 233 (68.74) | |
| Low (3.6–9 IU/g·Hb) | 12 (3.54) | 15 (4.42) | 27 (7.96) | |
| N |
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| No mutation | 11 (3.25) | 0 | 11 (3.25) | <0.0001 |
| Homozygous | 0 | 8 (2.36) | 8 (2.36) | |
| Hemizygous | 291 (85.84) | 0 | 291 (85.84) | |
| Heterozygous | 0 | 29 (8.55) | 29 (8.55) | |
| N | 302 | 37 | 339 | |
Figure 1Comparative distribution of G6PD activity by genders and genotypes. Each dot represents the G6PD enzyme activity of each subject. (a) G6PD activities between males and females. (b) G6PD activities among genotypes in both males and females.
Figure 2The prevalence and G6PD enzyme activity among Vietnamese ethnics. (a) The prevalence of G6PD deficiency among five different ethnicities. (b) Distribution of G6PD activities according to ethnic groups.
Distribution of G6PD variants in this study.
| Variant name | Position | Amino acid substitution | Type of variant | Exon | Case | Frequently (%) | In silico analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| c.95A>G | H32A | Missense | 2 | 24 | 7.08 | Damaging score: 0.998 |
|
| c.131C>G | A44G | Missense | 3 | 3 | 0.88 | Damaging score: 991 |
|
| c.392G>T | G131V | Missense | 5 | 12 | 3.54 | Damaging score: 0.826 |
|
| c.406C>T | L142C | Missense | 5 | 2 | 0.59 | Damaging score: 1 |
|
| c.517T>G | F173L | Missense | 5 | 1 | 0.29 | Damaging score: 1 |
|
| c.563C>T | S188P | Missense | 5 | 1 | 0.29 | Benign score: 0.371 |
|
| c.592C>T | R198C | Missense | 6 | 1 | 0.29 | Damaging score: 1 |
|
| c.871G>A | V291M | Missense | 9 | 83 | 24.48 | Damaging score: 0.996 |
|
| c.1024C>T | L342F | Missense | 9 | 14 | 4.13 | Benign score: 0.205 |
|
| c.1330 G > A | V444I | Missense | 11 | 1 | 0.29 | Benign score: 0.127 |
|
| c.1360C>T | R454C | Missense | 11 | 51 | 15.04 | Damaging score: 1 |
|
| c.1376G>T | R459L | Missense | 12 | 60 | 17.70 | Damaging score: 0.910 |
|
| c.1388G>A | R463H | Missense | 12 | 76 | 22.42 | Damaging score: 0.860 |
|
| c.1311C>T | T437T | Silent | 11 | 87 | 25.66 | N/A |
|
| c.406C>T | A142C | Missense | 5, 11 | 2 | 0.59 | N/A |
| c.1311C>T | T437T | /Silent | |||||
|
| c.871G>A | V291M | Missense | 9, 12 | 69 | 20.35 | N/A |
| c.1311C>T | T437T | /Silent | |||||
|
| c.1360C>T | R454C | Missense | 11 | 7 | 2.06 | N/A |
| c.1311C>T | T437T | /Silent | |||||
|
| c.1376G>T | R459L | Missense | 11, 12 | 2 | 0.59 | N/A |
| c.1311C>T | T437T | /Silent | |||||
|
| c.1388G>T | R463H | Missense | 11, 12 | 3 | 0.88 | N/A |
| c.1311C>T | T437T | /Silent | |||||
|
| c.1376G>T c.1388G>A | R459L, R463H | Missense | 12 | 1 | 0.29 | N/A |
Figure 3The electropherogram of G6PD variants. (a) Gaohe (c) 95A > G), (b) Orissa (c.131 C > G), (c) Quing Yan (c.392 G > T), (d) Valladolid (c.406 C > T), (e) NanKang (c.517 T > G), (f) Mediterranean (c.563 C > T), (g) Coimbra Shunde (c.592 C > T), (h) Viangchan (c.871 G > A), (i) Chinese-5 (c.1024 C > T), (j) Taiwan-2 (c.1330 G > A), (k) Union (c.1360 C > T), (l) Canton (c.1376 G > T), (m) Kaiping (c.1388 G > A), (n) Silent (c.1311 C > T), and (o) Canton/Kaiping (c.1376 G > T/c.1388 G > A).
Variant patterns of G6PD and corresponding enzyme activities.
| Variant patterns | Class | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemi | Enzyme activity (IU/g·Hb) | Homo | Enzyme activity (IU/g·Hb) | Hete | Enzyme activity (IU/g·Hb) | ||
| Valladolid | II | 2 | 1.98 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| NanKang | II | 1 | 1.7 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Mediterranean | II | 1 | 0.65 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Coimbra Shunde | II | 0 | — | 0 | — | 1 | 2.67 |
| Viangchan | II | 73 | 1.31 | 4 | 1.83 | 6 | 3.24 |
| Union | II | 41 | 0.66 | 1 | 0.12 | 9 | 2.8 |
| Canton | II | 55 | 1.26 | 0 | — | 5 | 2.98 |
| Kaiping | II | 72 | 1.32 | 1 | 1.28 | 3 | 2.13 |
| Gaohe | III | 22 | 1.34 | 0 | — | 2 | 4.15 |
| Orissa | III | 2 | 1.04 | 1 | 3.07 | 0 | — |
| Quing Yan | III | 10 | 2.05 | 0 | — | 2 | 5.19 |
| Chinese-5 | III | 11 | 1.38 | 1 | 4.14 | 2 | 4.19 |
| Taiwan 2 | III | 1 | 5.06 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
Figure 4Distribution of G6PD activities according to mutation types. Only variant groups in which there were ≥ 2 representatives are shown. (a) G6PD activities of single identified variants. (b) G6PD activities of compound variants.