| Literature DB >> 35845658 |
Germán Darío Ahumada1, Eva María Gómez-Álvarez1, Matteo Dell'Acqua1, Iris Bertani2, Vittorio Venturi2, Pierdomenico Perata1, Chiara Pucciariello1.
Abstract
Flooding events caused by severe rains and poor soil drainage can interfere with plant germination and seedling establishment. Rice is one of the cereal crops that has unique germination strategies under flooding. One of these strategies is based on the fast coleoptile elongation in order to reach the water surface and re-establish the contact with the air. Microorganisms can contribute to plant health via plant growth promoters and provide protection from abiotic stresses. To characterise the community composition of the microbiome in rice germination under submergence, a 16S rRNA gene profiling metagenomic analysis was performed of temperate japonica rice varieties Arborio and Lamone seedlings, which showed contrasting responses in terms of coleoptile length when submerged. This analysis showed a distinct microbiota composition of Arborio seeds under submergence, which are characterised by the development of a long coleoptile. To examine the potential function of microbial communities under submergence, culturable bacteria were isolated, identified and tested for plant growth-promoting activities. A subgroup of isolated bacteria showed the capacity to hydrolyse starch and produce indole-related compounds under hypoxia. Selected bacteria were inoculated in seeds to evaluate their effect on rice under submergence, showing a response that is dependent on the rice genotype. Our findings suggest that endophytic bacteria possess plant growth-promoting activities that can substantially contribute to rice seedling establishment under submergence.Entities:
Keywords: Oryza sativa; coleoptile; hypoxia; microbiota; rice
Year: 2022 PMID: 35845658 PMCID: PMC9277545 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.908349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1(A) Chao1 index reflecting the OTU abundance. Kruskal-Wallis test p = 0.055 (B) Shannon index reflecting the OTU diversity. Kruskal-Wallis test p = 0.073. (C) Relative abundance of the dominant phyla of Arborio and Lamone rice seedlings. (D) Relative abundance of the most abundant families of Arborio and Lamone rice seedlings. Only phyla and families showing a minimum average relative abundance of 20% are included in the figures, in which the average of the three replicates is represented. For Lamone air, two replicates are represented. (E) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates of the Bray-Curtis distance. (F) Relative abundance of the significant genus (FDR < 0.05) obtained grouping all the OTUs likely belonging to that single genus.
Putative bacterial endophytes isolated from Arborio and Lamone rice varieties at day 4 under dark air (Air) and submergence (Sub), and isolated under aerobic conditions.
| Origin | Closest relative | Characteristic | Growth | MA |
| Lamone Air |
| Endophytic ( | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| - | A | ||
|
| - | NA | ||
|
| - | A | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | NA | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | NA | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| - | A | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| Soil | A | ||
| Lamone Sub |
| Endophytic ( | FA | A |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
| Arborio Air |
| Endophytic ( | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| - | A | ||
|
| - | NA | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | NA | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | NA | ||
|
| NA | |||
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| - | A | ||
|
| Endophytic ( | A | ||
|
| - | A | ||
| Arborio Sub |
| Endophytic ( | FA | A |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | NA |
Taxonomic putative assignment was performed through 16S rRNA gene analysis using 27F and 1492R primers (
Putative bacterial endophytes isolated from Arborio and Lamone rice varieties at day 4 under dark submergence (Sub), and isolated under hypoxia.
| Origin | Closest relative | Characteristic | Growth | MA |
| Lamone Sub |
| - | FA | NA |
|
| A | |||
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
|
| A | |||
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
| Arborio Sub |
| Endophytic ( | FA | A |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | A | |
|
| Endophytic ( | FA | NA |
Taxonomic putative assignment was performed through 16S rRNA gene analysis using 27F and 1492R primers (
In vitro activities of putative endophytic bacteria isolated from Arborio and Lamone rice varieties and reported in Tables 1, 2.
| Activities in aerobic conditions | |||||
|
| |||||
| Origin | Closest relative | IRC | SH | N2 fix | P sol |
| Lamone air |
| − | − | + | − |
|
| + | − | + | − | |
|
| − | − | + | − | |
|
| + | − | − | − | |
|
| + | − | + | − | |
|
| − | − | + | + | |
|
| − | − | + | + | |
| Lamone sub |
| + | − | + | + |
| Arborio air |
| − | + | + | + |
|
| − | − | + | + | |
|
| + | + | + | − | |
|
| + | + | − | − | |
|
| + | + | − | − | |
|
| − | + | + | − | |
|
| − | + | − | − | |
|
| + | − | + | + | |
|
| + | + | + | − | |
| Arborio sub |
| + | − | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | |
|
| + | − | + | + | |
|
| − | + | − | − | |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||
| Lamone sub |
| − | + | ||
|
| + | − | |||
|
| + | − | |||
| Arborio sub |
| + | + | ||
|
| + | − | |||
|
| + | − | |||
|
| − | + | |||
IRC, indole-related compounds production; SH, starch hydrolysis; N
Antimicrobial susceptibility test applying in vitro diffusion on bacteria isolated from rice samples under submergence and showing PGP activities under hypoxia from Table 3.
| CTX | KZ | TE | K | CN | S | AMP | P | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 42 ± 2a | 30 ± 1b | 39 ± 2a | 25 ± 1b | 29 ± 2b | − | 31 ± 1 | 36 ± 4 |
|
| 32 ± 1a | 29 ± 3a | 30 ± 2a | 20 ± 1b | 22 ± 1b | 20 ± 1 | 23 ± 1 | − |
|
| 31 ± 1a | 28 ± 1b | 28 ± 1b | 18 ± 1c | 23 ± 1d | 17 ± 1 | 22 ± 1 | − |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 34 ± 3a | 20 ± 2b | 24 ± 3b | 21 ± 2b | 23 ± 1b | 18 ± 3 | 14 ± 1 | 8 ± 1 |
|
| 36 ± 2a | 15 ± 2d | 28 ± 2b | 21 ± 1c | 23 ± 1c | 18 ± 2 | 13 ± 1 | − |
|
| 31 ± 6a | 32 ± 1a | 28 ± 1a | 18 ± 1b | 23 ± 3b | 17 ± 1 | 23 ± 1 | 9 ± 1 |
|
| 29 ± 1c | − | 35 ± 1a | 24 ± 1d | 31 ± 1b | 21 ± 1 | 25 ± 1 | 21 ± 1 |
Results are the mean ± SD of the diameter (mm) of the inhibition from three individual colonies after applying the antibiotic disk containing kanamycin (K, 30 μg), streptomycin (S, 25 μg), ampicillin (AMP, 10 μg), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 μg), penicillin (P, 6 μg), tetracycline (TE, 30 μg), cephazolin (KZ, 30 μg), gentamicin (CN, 30 μg). For each species, the effect of different antibiotic disks content of 30 μg was compared (n = 3) (Two-way ANOVA test, p < 0.05, letters represent Tukey’s post hoc test).
FIGURE 2(A) Arabidopsis root growth up to 7 days after germination, using cefotaxime MIC 0.4 ug*mL–1 and a further concentration of 1.6 ug*mL–1 in the medium. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 3). ANOVA test. (B) Arabidopsis seedling phenotype at day 7 after germination using cefotaxime MIC 0.4 ug*mL– 1 and a further concentration of 1.6 ug*mL– 1 in the medium. (C) Lamone and Arborio coleoptile length at day 4 under dark submergence, adding cefotaxime MIC 0.4 ug*mL– 1 and a further concentration of 1.6 ug*mL– 1 in the medium. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 3). ANOVA test p < 0.05. Tuckey post hoc test (D) Lamone, Arborio and Ermes coleoptile length at day 4 under dark submergence, inoculating the seed with bacteria suspension. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Student’s t-test, p ≤ 0.01.