| Literature DB >> 35845391 |
C Pushpalatha1, K V Bharkhavy1, Arshiya Shakir1, Dominic Augustine2, S V Sowmya2, Hammam Ahmed Bahammam3, Sarah Ahmed Bahammam4, Nassreen Hassan Mohammad Albar5, Bassam Zidane6, Shankargouda Patil7.
Abstract
Dental caries is a common chronic disease, and anyone can be at threat of it throughout their lifespan. In school-aged children, dental caries is the most frequent disease related with oral health. Contemporary dental caries management focuses on non-restorative, non-invasive, and micro-invasive therapeutic techniques that effectively eliminate the caries progression at the lesion level and decrease the loss of healthy tooth structure. One of these strategies is to use caries apprehending agents with antibacterial and remineralizing characteristics. Due to recent regulatory approval in the United States, the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) for the therapy of dental caries has received substantial interest. SDF has successfully prevented and reversed both primary tooth caries and permanent teeth root caries. Even though SDF is an effective anti-caries agent, but it is associated with certain drawbacks like gum irritation, metallic taste, and irreversible dark stains on applying on cavities. As an alternative agent Nano Silver Fluoride (NSF) is preferable because it performs like SDF without tooth staining. It has comparable preventive and antibacterial activities as SDF. Further, it is ergonomic, economic and safe in children and adults. The current article aims to highlight the superior properties of NSF as a better anti-caries agent outstripping the limitations of discoloration of SDF.Entities:
Keywords: anticaries agent; colloid; nano silver fluoride; silver diamine fluoride; varnish
Year: 2022 PMID: 35845391 PMCID: PMC9283724 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.931327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Highlights on Nano Silver Fluoride.
Studies related to anti-microbial activity of NSF against cariogenic pathogens.
| Author | Pathogens studied | Comparator | Tests done | Research findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| NaF toothpaste | Microdilution tests, Anti-adherence and anti-acid effects | NSF had a MIC of 30 ppm against |
|
|
| NaF and Deionized water | Enamel adhesion and acid production | When compared to the negative control, NaF (positive control) and NSF were helpful at averting pH reduction, with NSF outperforming both the positive and negative controls |
|
|
| Different concentrations of NSF (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 2.5%, and 5%) | Bacteria per millimeter |
|
|
|
| Propolis fluoride and SDF | MIC, MBC | PPF had a 3% MIC for |
|
|
| NaF varnish | Agar diffusion test | When the concentration of NSF was raised, the mean value of inhibition zone size (mm) rose. As the concentration of NSF was increased, the mean value of the inhibitory zone (mm) for |
|
|
| SDF | Viability of Biofilm in various stages of maturation | NSF was comparable with Silver Diamine Fluoride in inhibiting formation of |
Studies related to remineralization potential of NSF for caries prevention.
| Author, Year | Samples | Experimental group | Control group | Tests done | Research findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Third molars | 1%–12% SDF, 2%–2.5% NaF + AgNps | Deionized water | SEM, Micro CT | NSF and NaF proved equally successful in remineralizing enamel, with a statistically significant difference ( |
|
| Deciduous teeth | NSF NaF | Deionized water | Vickers microhardness, OCT | There is no statistically significant difference in VHN between the NSF and NaF dentifrices. OCT analysis demonstrates that the NaF and NSF dentifrices behave similarly |
|
| Primary anterior teeth | Group 1: 5% NaF varnish Group 2: n-HAP serum Group 3: NSF | Group 4: no agent | Vickers microhardness Atomic Force microscopy | NSF is perhaps the most effective in remineralization. In terms of remineralizing early caries, both NaF varnish and n-HAP serum performed similarly |
|
| Human teeth | Group 1: NSF Group 2: NaF | No agent | Optic coherence Tomography, Vickers microhardness, Fluoresence spectroscopy | The extinction coefficients of the NaF and nanosilver fluoride groups were similar, but the negative group had a lower extinction coefficient |
|
| Premolars | Group 1: Control Group 2: NSF Group 3: N-HAP Group 4:CPP-ACP paste | No treatment | Vickers Microhardness | The highest SMH values were observed in NSF group (mean: 238.84 ± 20.31) |
|
| Premolars | Group 3: NSF + GIC Group 4: NSF + composite | Group 1: GIC Group 2: Composite | Vickers microhardness | The mean microhardness value of GIC and composite groups pretreated with NSF was more than the non-treated group, indicating lesser demineralization |
|
| Sound Third molars | NSF group Sodium Fluoride group SDF group | No treatment | Vickers Microhardness, SEM images | NSF group showed maximum mineral deposit on enamel surface |
|
| Primary teeth | NSF group (Ia) Fluoride Varnish Group (IIa) | No treatment (Ib, IIb) | Vickers Microhardness, Polarized Light microscopy | Both NSF and Fluoride varnish is equally effective |
In-Vivo randomized controlled studies related to NSF for caries management.
| Author, Year | Study sample | Comparison | Research findings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 337 children aged between 5 and 7 years | NSF 600—Intervention and NSF 400—Positive control | When compared to NSF 400 (56.5%), NSF 600 had a greater performance level in preventing caries (72.7%, |
|
| 12 school children of both genders, between 7 and 8 years | NSF- Experimental group Saline- Control group | In comparison to the other groups, NSF had lower CFU numbers. |
|
| 100 deciduous molars from 60 children | NSF- Experimental group Saline- Control group | After 7 days, 78% of teeth in the NSF group exhibited arrest of dentine caries, whereas 72.91% showed arrested caries after 5 months and 65.21% after 12 months |
|
| 159 active dentinal carious lesions in primary molars (from 50 children) | 5% Nano-silver fluoride varnish - Experimental group SDF—Control group | Success rate of 77% at the end of twelve-month follow up with Nano-silver fluoride varnish |
|
| 22 children aged from 1 to 6 years | Experimental group- Fluoride varnish added with 0.1% AgNPs Control group- Commercial fluoride varnish | Teeth that had been lacquered with AgNPs showed a lower mean fluorescence intensity than those that had been painted with commercial varnish |
|
| Primary teeth (130) in children | NSF—Experimental group Water- Control group | 72.7% of the NSF group had halted decay, whereas 27.4% of the control group had 66.7% of lesions treated with NSF were still arrested after a year |
|
| 63 preschoolers with 164 active lesions | Combination of Nano-Silver Fluoride and Green Tea Extract (NSF-GTE) with SDF | At the end of 6 months, NSF-GTE and SDF had total arrest rates of 67.4% and 796 |