| Literature DB >> 35844926 |
Yang Yang1,2, Yinyin Lian1,2, Shimei Yin1,2, Huayi Suo1, Fankun Zeng1, Hongwei Wang1, Jiajia Song1, Yu Zhang1,2.
Abstract
The formation of white bio-membrane (shenghua) on the surface of pickle leads to uneatable and spoiled products, which has been the key problem restricting the development of Sichuan pickle industry. In this study, the 17 microorganisms in the white membrane of pickled radish were screened and identified, of which Candida parapsilosis was the main strain causing "shenghua". The membrane-forming ability of Candida parapsilosis was determined by crystal violet staining to explore its adaptability to the fermentation environment concerning temperature and oxygen. It was found that Candida parapsilosis had the strongest membrane-forming capacity under the aerobic condition at 37°C, with the highest OD595 nm value reached to 3.473 ± 0.07 at 72 h post inoculation. This research identified Lactobacillus fermentum SHY10 to be the inhibitor of the membrane production of Candida parapsilosis via the Oxford cup method on a Petri dish, and via co-inoculation with Candida parapsilosis in pickles. Furthermore, this study specified that the cell-free supernatant (CFS) of L. fermentum SHY10 had the most significant inhibitory effects and likely to result from protein substances in the CFS. Proteases treated CFS had significantly reduced inhibitory effects against membrane formation, which confirmed that the active component was protein substances. Overall, this study identified a functional LAB strain with significant inhibitory effects against the white membrane formation in pickles, which provide a safe and consumer-friendly solution for the membrane problem in the fermented vegetable industry.Entities:
Keywords: Inhibition mechanism; Lactobacillus fermentum; bio‐membrane; pickled radish; white film
Year: 2022 PMID: 35844926 PMCID: PMC9281942 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 3.553
Homologous alignment analysis of sequences from isolates
| Strain number | BLAST identification results | Homology (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1‐2‐4 |
| 100 |
| A2 |
| 100 |
| A3 |
| 100 |
| A4 |
| 99.56 |
| A1 |
| 99.49 |
| A6 |
| 100 |
| A7 |
| 100 |
| A8 |
| 99.49 |
| A11 |
| 99.49 |
| A12 |
| 99.49 |
| B1 |
| 99.93 |
| B5 |
| 100 |
| B6 |
| 100 |
| B7 |
| 99.79 |
| B8 |
| 99.65% |
| B9 |
| 100.00 |
| B10 |
| 100.00 |
FIGURE 1Screening test results of membrane‐producing strains. Note: From left to right: Pediococcus ethanolidurans; Lactobacillus plantarum; Enterococcus faecium; Candida parapsilosis; Bacillus altitudinis; Klebsiella aerogenes; Paenibacillus barcinonensis
FIGURE 2OD values of Candida parapsilosis during 24‐h incubation at 37°C
FIGURE 3Membrane formation in pickles with/without inoculation of Candida parapsilosis
Colony count of Candida parapsilosis under different culture conditions
| Time (h) | Number of colonies(CFU/ml) | |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic | Anaerobic | |
| 24 | 4.2 × 106 | 2.92 × 106 |
| 48 | 3.75 × 107 | 1.4 × 108 |
| 72 | 8.8 × 107 | 9.15 × 106 |
Colony counts of Candida parapsilosis under different temperature conditions
| Time (h) | Number of colonies(CFU/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10°C | 25°C | 37°C | |
| 24 | 1.75 × 105 | 1.97 × 106 | 3.20 × 106 |
| 48 | 1.48 × 106 | 1.44 × 107 | 3.82 × 107 |
| 72 | 1.86 × 106 | 7.20 × 107 | 8.90 × 107 |
Membrane formation of Candida parapsilosis at different temperatures
| Time (h) | OD595nm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10°C | 25°C | 37°C | |
| 24 | 0.763 ± 0.01 | 1.988 ± 0.13 | 2.719 ± 0.14 |
| 48 | 1.588 ± 0.06 | 3.473 ± 0.07 | 3.109 ± 0.15 |
| 72 | 2.447 ± 0.07 | 3.664 ± 0.09 | 3.582 ± 0.09 |
FIGURE 4Appearance of pickles inoculated with membrane‐producing yeast (a) and pickles inoculated with both membrane‐producing yeast and Lactobacillus fermentum SHY10 (b)
Inhibitory effect of various concentrations of sterile supernatant of Lactobacillus fermentum SHY10 on Candida parapsilosis B7
| Volume of CFS(μl) | Control (MRS medium) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter of the transparent circle of suppression circle (cm) | 0* | 0.47 ± 0.03* | 0.82 ± 0.01* | 1.14 ± 0.01* | 2.32 ± 0.02* | 2.61 ± 0.03* |
*Indicates significant differences among all date points.
FIGURE 5Inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus fermentum SHY10 on Candida parapsilosis on plates
FIGURE 6Effect of proteases on the inhibitory effects of supernatant of Lactobacillus fermentum SHY10 against Candida parapsilosis