Literature DB >> 35844348

Surgical Camouflage as a Solution for Complete Decompensating Failures: An Interesting Experience With Class III Case Scenarios.

Ratna Parameswaran1, Dharshini Ganapathi1, Balaji Rajkumar1, Anantanarayanan Parameswaran2.   

Abstract

Dental compensations are an integral part of skeletal malocclusions. Failure to achieve optimal decompensation may lead to compromised surgical movements, thereby resulting in sub-optimal occlusion and soft tissue profile. Hence the mandibular subapical osteotomy was chosen as a minimalistic surgical alternative to the traditional combination of Le Fort 1 and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. The choice was made by prioritizing soft tissue considerations, which offered the probability of a better post-treatment outcome. This paper highlights two such challenging case scenarios where the surgical plan was modified in accordance with the soft tissue as the primary objective.
Copyright © 2022, Parameswaran et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  camouflage; class iii malocclusion; orthognathic surgery; soft tissue aesthetics; sub apical osteotomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35844348      PMCID: PMC9281467          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  10 in total

1.  Dental and skeletal changes associated with Class II surgical-orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Brittany Potts; Shiva Shanker; Henry W Fields; Katherine W L Vig; F Michael Beck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  The clinical outcome of skeletal anchorage in interceptive treatment (in growing patients) for class III malocclusion.

Authors:  J Meyns; D M Brasil; J F Mazzi-Chaves; C Politis; R Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 3.  Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontics: Inadequate Planning Leading to Complications or Unfavorable Results.

Authors:  Katherine P Klein; Leonard B Kaban; Mohamed I Masoud
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae.

Authors:  C S Handelman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Inferior subapical osteotomy for dentoalveolar decompensation of class III malocclusion in 'surgery-first' and 'surgery-early' orthognathic treatment.

Authors:  F Hernández-Alfaro; M J Nieto; V Ruiz-Magaz; A Valls-Ontañón; I Méndez-Manjón; R Guijarro-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Who seeks surgical-orthodontic treatment: a current review.

Authors:  L J Bailey; L H Haltiwanger; G H Blakey; W R Proffit
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2001

7.  Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery: how long does it take and why? A retrospective study.

Authors:  F Luther; D O Morris; C Hart
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.651

8.  Accelerated decompensation of mandibular incisors in surgical skeletal class III patients by using augmented corticotomy: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Dong-Yeol Lee; Young-Guk Park; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  How much incisor decompensation is achieved prior to orthognathic surgery?

Authors:  Calum McNeil; Grant T McIntyre; Sean Laverick
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-07-01

10.  Treatment in Borderline Class III Malocclusion: Orthodontic Camouflage (Extraction) Versus Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  A-Bakr M Rabie; Ricky W K Wong; G U Min
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2008-03-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.