Literature DB >> 8712499

The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae.

C S Handelman1.   

Abstract

Delineating the limits of orthodontic treatment in nongrowing individuals is important when making treatment decisions, especially in borderline orthodontic-surgical cases. The labial and lingual cortical plates at the level of the incisor apex may represent the anatomic limits of tooth movement. Cephalometric films of 107 adults were measured to determine the width of alveolar bone anterior and posterior to the incisor apex in each arch. Thin alveolar widths were found both labial and lingual to the mandibular incisors in groups of Class I, II, and III individuals with high SN-MP angle and in a group of Class III average SN-MP individuals. Thin alveolar widths were also found lingual to the maxillary incisors in a Class II high angle group. Clinical cases are presented showing that orthodontic tooth movement may be limited in patients with narrow alveolar bone widths and that these patients are likely to experience increased iatrogenic sequelae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712499     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0095:TAAIII>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  57 in total

1.  Relationship of Anterior Alveolar Dimensions with Mandibular Divergence in Class I Malocclusion - A Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Ratna Rachel Ponraj; Vinoth Abraham Korath; Devaki Vijayalakshmi; Ratna Parameswaran; Priya Raman; Catherine Sunitha; Nayeemullah Khan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

2.  Geometric analysis of alveolar bone around the incisors after anterior retraction following premolar extraction.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Suk-Cheol Lee; Jun-Beom Lee; Kyung-Min Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Alveolar bone response to maxillary incisor retraction using stable skeletal structures as a reference.

Authors:  Teerapat Eksriwong; Udom Thongudomporn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Establishment of reference mandibular plane for anterior alveolar morphology evaluation using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Rong-yang Wang; Min Han; Hong Liu; Chun-ling Wang; Hong-hong Xian; Lei Zhang; Shi-jie Zhang; Dong-xu Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Gingival recession: its causes and types, and the importance of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Ana Suzy Jati; Laurindo Zanco Furquim; Alberto Consolaro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

6.  Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam CT study.

Authors:  K-Y Nahm; J-H Kang; S-C Moon; Y-S Choi; Y-A Kook; S-H Kim; Jc Huang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  The Cortical Boundary Line as a Guide for Incisor Re-positioning with Anterior Segmental Osteotomies.

Authors:  Abraham Vinod Korath; Ratna Padmanabhan; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-23

8.  Anterior alveolar dimensions among different classifications of sagittal jaw relationship in Saudi subjects.

Authors:  Adel Alhadlaq
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-02-06

9.  Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Sukru Enhos; Tancan Uysal; Ahmet Yagci; İlknur Veli; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Törün Ozer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Skeletal anteroposterior discrepancy and vertical type effects on lower incisor preoperative decompensation and postoperative compensation in skeletal Class III patients.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.