| Literature DB >> 35842704 |
Xiaoli Zhang1, Ziyu Wang2, Xiaoning Ma1, Yanyan Jin1, Jingxin Wang1, Hang Yu1, Tong Li1, Xiaolei Xiu3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical utility of surgical reconstruction of finger pulp defects using a plantar flap derived from the toes, with vascular anastomosis of the toe-finger artery and the plantar-palmar vein of the finger.Entities:
Keywords: Digital pulp defect; Hand injury; Second toe; Toe pulp flap; Transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35842704 PMCID: PMC9287904 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03232-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.677
Patient characteristics
| Case | Sex | Age | Affect finger | Pattern of defect | Skin defect size(cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 19 | Right little finger | Digital pulp defect of little finger | 1.0 × 0.8 |
| 2 | M | 50 | Left index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 1.0 × 0.8 |
| 3 | F | 35 | Left middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.5 × 2.5 |
| 4 | F | 43 | Left middle finger | A dorsal defect of the proximal middle finger | 1.5 × 3 |
| 5 | F | 49 | Left little finger | Digital pulp defect of little finger | 1.2 × 1.0 |
| 6 | M | 18 | Left little finger | Digital pulp defect of little finger | 1.0 × 0.8 |
| 7 | F | 47 | Left index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 1.5 × 2.0 |
| 8 | M | 37 | Right ring finger | Digital pulp defect of ring finger | 1.5 × 2.0 |
| 9 | M | 21 | Right little finger | Digital pulp defect of little finger | 1.5 × 2.0 |
| 10 | F | 37 | Left middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.5 × 1.0 |
| 11 | M | 17 | Left index finger | A dorsal defect of the proximal index finger | 1.8 × 2.5 |
| 12 | M | 27 | Right middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.5 × 2.0 |
| Right ring finger | Digital pulp defect of ring finger | 1.5 × 1.0 | |||
| 13 | M | 39 | Right middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.3 × 1.0 |
| 14 | M | 36 | Right index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 1.5 × 2.5 |
| 15 | M | 56 | Right index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 1.5 × 2.0 |
| 16 | M | 21 | Left middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.0 × 0.8 |
| Left ring finger | Digital pulp defect of ring finger | 1.5 × 1.5 | |||
| 17 | F | 36 | Right middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.2 × 1.0 |
| 18 | M | 30 | Left index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 1.5 × 1.0 |
| 19 | F | 45 | Left ring finger | Digital pulp defect of ring finger | 1.6 × 2.0 |
| 20 | M | 38 | Left index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 1.6 × 2.0 |
| 21 | M | 17 | Right middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.5 × 1.0 |
| 22 | F | 38 | Right index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 2.3 × 4.0 |
| 23 | F | 39 | Right index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 2.0 × 1.0 |
| 24 | M | 54 | Right ring finger | Digital pulp defect of ring finger | 1.3 × 2.0 |
| 25 | M | 29 | Left index finger | Digital pulp defect of index finger | 1.5 × 3.0 |
| 26 | F | 38 | Left middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.0 × 0.8 |
| Left ring finger | Digital pulp defect of ring finger | 1.0 × 0.8 | |||
| 27 | F | 52 | Right little finger | Digital pulp defect of little finger | 1.5 × 2.0 |
| 28 | M | 21 | Left ring finger | Digital pulp defect of ring finger | 1.5 × 2.0 |
| 29 | F | 50 | Right middle finger | Digital pulp defect of middle finger | 1.0 × 1.0 |
Fig. 1a A preoperative image of a middle finger pulp defect of the right hand. b. Schematic diagram. c Design of the second toe plantar flap in the contralateral foot. d. Schematic diagram. e Flap collection. f Schematic diagram. g Recipient site appearance. h Schematic diagram. i Direct suturing of the donor site. j Schematic diagram. k Flap survival status. A. Schematic diagram l At a 3-month postoperative follow-up, the repaired middle finger and donor sites exhibited a satisfactory appearance
Fig. 2a–b A preoperative image of a middle finger pulp defect of the right hand. c Design of the second toe plantar flap in the contralateral foot. d Flap collection. e–f Recipient site appearance. g–h 10 days after the operation. i–j At 2-year postoperative follow-up