| Literature DB >> 33238347 |
Min Ki Hong1, Dong Chul Lee1, Min Suk Choi1, Sung Hoon Koh1, Jin Soo Kim1, Si Young Roh1, Kyung Jin Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of the partial second toe pulp free flap has enabled superior aesthetic and functional results for fingertip reconstruction in adults. Children undergoing fingertip amputation for various reasons have limited options for reconstruction. Conventional treatment could shorten the finger, leading to poor cosmesis and function. We report 18 years of our experiences with fingertip reconstruction using partial second toe pulp free flaps in patients in early childhood.Entities:
Keywords: Childhood; Fingertip; Free tissue transfer flaps; Reconstructive surgical procedure
Year: 2020 PMID: 33238347 PMCID: PMC7700850 DOI: 10.5999/aps.2020.01137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Plast Surg ISSN: 2234-6163
Fig. 1.Partial second toe free flap design and elevation
(A) Flap design on the medial side of the second toe. (B) Flap elevation and harvesting along the pre-tendinous layer with neurovascular bundle. (C) Donor site was closed primarily.
Data of pediatric patients who underwent partial second toe free pulp transfer documented by chart review (n=18)
| Factor | Mean (range) |
|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 3.0 (1–5) |
| Sex, male/female | 10/7 |
| Hand, right/left | 12/6 |
| Finger, index/middle/ring/little | 4/8/5/1 |
| Diameter of artery (mm) | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) |
| Diameter of vein (mm) | 0.3 (0.3–0.5) |
| Operation time (min) | 142 (105–240) |
| Follow-up period (mon) | 66.4 (6–213) |
| Flap size (cm2) | 1.72 (0.96–2.34) |
Long-term follow-up data of traceable patients (n=15)
| Characteristics | Mean (range) |
|---|---|
| Growth rate (%) | |
| Flap dimension | 68.9 (19.7–182.0) |
| Distal phalanx of injured finger | 43.2 (0–93.1) |
| Distal phalanx of uninjured finger | 47.6 (0–95.4) |
| Static two-point discrimination test (mm) | |
| Injured finger | 4.9 (4–6) |
| Uninjured finger | 4.5 (4–6) |
| Moving two-point discrimination test (mm) | |
| Injured finger | 3.9 (3–5) |
| Uninjured finger | 3.5 (3–4) |
| Satisfaction, excellent/good/fair/poor | 4/7/4/0 |
Comparison of distal phalanx growth and sensation between injured and uninjured fingers (n=15)
| Variable | Mean (range) | P-value[ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Injured finger | Uninjured finger | ||
| Growth rate of distal phalanx (%) | 43.2 (0–93.1) | 47.6 (0–95.4) | 0.616 |
| Static 2PD test (mm) | 4.9 (4.0–6.0) | 4.5 (4.0–6.0) | 0.261 |
| Dynamic 2PD test (mm) | 3.9 (3.0–5.0) | 3.5 (3.0–4.0) | 0.161 |
2PD test, two-point discrimination test.
Student t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test.
Spearman nonparametric coefficient correlation between growth rate of the flap dimension and the distal phalanx length
| Spearman nonparametric correlation | Growth rate of distal phalanx length | |
|---|---|---|
| Growth rate of flap dimension | Correlation coefficient | 0.932 |
| P-value | 0.001[ | |
| Number | 15 | |
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
Postoperative complications
| Variable | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Flap survival | 18 (100) |
| Re-exploration (thrombosis, spasm, congestion) | 1 (6) |
| Flap loss | 2 (11) |
| Partial (> 25%) | 2 (11) |
| Total (> 75%) | 0 |
| Complications | 7 (39) |
| Sensory (cold intolerance, pain, tingling sensation) | 3 (17) |
| Nail deformity | 4 (22) |
| Donor site problem | 0 |
Fig. 2.Case 1
(A) A 2-year-old girl suffered from 1.2×1.1 cm soft tissue defect after replantation on the tip of right middle finger with tuft bone exposure. (B) Soft tissue coverage with partial second toe pulp free flap on the defect. (C, D) At the 26 months follow-up, the flap appears slightly bulky but shows adequate contour and a joint crease. (E, F) At the 26 months follow-up, the second toe showed uneasily noticeable scar.
Fig. 3.Case 2
(A) A 5-year-old boy had 1.5×1.2 cm soft defect after replantation on the tip of left index finger with bone exposure. (B) The defect was covered with a partial second toe pulp free flap. (C, D) At the 18 years follow-up, the flap and distal phalanx appears slightly short but was difficult to easily notice the differences. (E, F) At the 18 years follow-up, the second toe showed scarring that was difficult to see.