| Literature DB >> 35842601 |
Jyotsna Gupta1, Zoltan Antal1, Elizabeth Mauer2, Linda M Gerber2, Anjile An2, Marisa Censani3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at increased risk of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study is to evaluate dysglycemia and biochemical differences based on BMI status and assess the prognostic ability of elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in predicting an abnormal 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; BMI; Dysglycemia; Obesity; PCOS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35842601 PMCID: PMC9288674 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-01098-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 3.263
Fig. 1Flowchart indicating study subjects
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population
| All Patients ( | |
|---|---|
| N (%) or Median [IQR] | |
| Age (years) | 15.8 [14.2–16.4] |
| Race/Ethnicity | |
| Asian | 8 (7.5%) |
| Caucasian | 27 (25.5%) |
| African American | 11 (10.4%) |
| Hispanic | 17 (16.0%) |
| Other/Unknown | 43 (40.6%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.7 [27.4–35.7] |
| BMI Z Score | 1.96 [1.47–2.25] |
| BMI Percentile | 97.6 [92.7–98.8] |
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dl) | 82.5 [78.0–88.8] |
| 2 hour Glucose (mg/dl) | 108.0 [91.2–132] |
| HbA1c % (n = 89) | 5.40 [5.20–5.80] |
IQR Interquartile range, BMI Body Mass Index, HbA1c Hemoglobin A1c
Biochemical characteristics of adolescent PCOS subjects stratified by BMI
| BMI < 95th percentile ( | BMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.1 [15.6–16.8] | 15.2 [13.3–16.1] | 0.002** | |
| 25.4 [23.5–27.6] | 34.7 [30.6–38.1] | < 0.001*** | |
| 1.15 [0.87–1.43] | 2.17 [1.95–2.38] | < 0.001*** | |
| 5.40 [5.10–5.53] | 5.50 [5.20–5.80] | 0.147 | |
| 0.325 | |||
| Normal | 30 (88.2%) | 54 (75.0%) | |
| Impaired Glucose Tolerance | 4 (11.7%) | 17 (23.6%) | |
| Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (1.4%) | |
| 97.0 [84.8–111.0] | 116 [96.0–138.0] | 0.005** | |
| 1.79 [1.04–2.36] | 4.02 [2.82–5.94] | < 0.001*** | |
| 5.13 [3.90–8.64] | 2.00 [1.23–3.21] | < 0.001*** | |
| 44.0 [26.5–53.5] | 45.0 [37.0–56.0] | 0.293 | |
| 4.70 [2.30–8.25] | 7.90 [3.92–11.0] | 0.026* | |
| 2.19 [0.94–2.68] | 1.54 [1.00–2.30] | 0.328 | |
| 0.028* | |||
| <= 2 | 13 (43%) | 43 (67%) | |
| > 2 | 17 (57%) | 21 (33%) |
IQR Interquartile range, OGTT Oral Glucose Tolerance Test, BMI Body Mass Index, HbA1c Hemoglobin A1c, HOMA-IR Homeostasis Model Assessment, WBISI Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index
***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05
Fig. 2Differences in biochemical characteristics between the < 95th percentile and ≥ 95th percentile groups for A 2 h glucose, B HOMA-IR and WBISI, and C free testosterone levels
Fig. 3ROC curve of HbA1c predicting abnormal OGTT
Linear regression of testosterone in relation to HOMA-IR and WBISI
| 0.031 (0.005, 0.06) | 0.024* | 0.022 (–0.001, 0.045) | 0.069 | |
| 0.214 (0.091, 0.336) | 0.001** | 0.151 (0.033, 0.269) | 0.014* | |
| –0.026 (–0.054, 0.003) | 0.080 | –0.017 (–0.043, 0.009) | 0.203 | |
| –0.110 (–0.248, 0.027) | 0.119 | –0.033 (–0.162, 0.096) | 0.620 | |
BMI Body Mass Index, HOMA-IR Homeostasis Model Assessment, WBISI Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index
***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05