L van Hout1,2, W J V Bökkerink3,4, P W H E Vriens3,5. 1. Department of Surgery, Hernia Center Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital (ETZ), Tilburg, The Netherlands. ludovanhout88@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ludovanhout88@gmail.com. 3. Department of Surgery, Hernia Center Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital (ETZ), Tilburg, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential to evaluate inguinal hernia surgery. There is a need for digital and disease-specific PRO measurement. Current measuring instruments (PROMs) have several disadvantages, for example, fixed measuring moments with a chance of recall bias. The Q1.6 Inguinal Hernia application has been developed to overcome these challenges. This pilot study reports the first clinical feasibility results. METHODS: All surgically treated inguinal hernia patients were eligible for inclusion. The application uses "twitch crowdsourcing"; after unlocking a smartphone or tablet, a single short question is asked. This can easily be repeated multiple times a day/week/month. Questions from validated questionnaires were implemented. The adaptive question engine generates an individualised set of questions. Alerts are generated when a complication is suspected. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients were given over 50.000 questions of which 92% were answered. Pre- and postoperative patient characteristics and their reported clinical outcomes confirmed a standard inguinal hernia population. Compliance with the application was 91.7% after 14 days, 69.0% after 3 months and 28.8% after one year. After months 3, 6 and 11, respectively, 3.0%, 4.4% and 4.5% of patients reported inguinal pain or discomfort (NRS ≥ 4). Patients were highly satisfied (92.8% preferred the app over standard care). CONCLUSIONS: This smartphone application shows promising results for clinical practice. It might allow for continuous digital patient-reported outcome measurement using non-intrusive, concise questions. Remote monitoring may become standard postoperative care after (inguinal hernia) surgery. The current application will be further improved and evaluated for cost-effectiveness, safety and validity.
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential to evaluate inguinal hernia surgery. There is a need for digital and disease-specific PRO measurement. Current measuring instruments (PROMs) have several disadvantages, for example, fixed measuring moments with a chance of recall bias. The Q1.6 Inguinal Hernia application has been developed to overcome these challenges. This pilot study reports the first clinical feasibility results. METHODS: All surgically treated inguinal hernia patients were eligible for inclusion. The application uses "twitch crowdsourcing"; after unlocking a smartphone or tablet, a single short question is asked. This can easily be repeated multiple times a day/week/month. Questions from validated questionnaires were implemented. The adaptive question engine generates an individualised set of questions. Alerts are generated when a complication is suspected. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients were given over 50.000 questions of which 92% were answered. Pre- and postoperative patient characteristics and their reported clinical outcomes confirmed a standard inguinal hernia population. Compliance with the application was 91.7% after 14 days, 69.0% after 3 months and 28.8% after one year. After months 3, 6 and 11, respectively, 3.0%, 4.4% and 4.5% of patients reported inguinal pain or discomfort (NRS ≥ 4). Patients were highly satisfied (92.8% preferred the app over standard care). CONCLUSIONS: This smartphone application shows promising results for clinical practice. It might allow for continuous digital patient-reported outcome measurement using non-intrusive, concise questions. Remote monitoring may become standard postoperative care after (inguinal hernia) surgery. The current application will be further improved and evaluated for cost-effectiveness, safety and validity.
Authors: S Alfieri; P K Amid; G Campanelli; G Izard; H Kehlet; A R Wijsmuller; D Di Miceli; G B Doglietto Journal: Hernia Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: James Higgins; Justin Chang; Graeme Hoit; Jas Chahal; Tim Dwyer; John Theodoropoulos Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Eva van der Meij; Johannes R Anema; Wouter K G Leclercq; Marlies Y Bongers; Esther C J Consten; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Peter M van de Ven; Caroline B Terwee; Johanna M van Dongen; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Wilhelmus J H J Meijerink; Hendrik J Bonjer; Judith A F Huirne Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: F Muysoms; G Campanelli; G G Champault; A C DeBeaux; U A Dietz; J Jeekel; U Klinge; F Köckerling; V Mandala; A Montgomery; S Morales Conde; F Puppe; R K J Simmermacher; M Śmietański; M Miserez Journal: Hernia Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Miriam van der Velde; Karin Valkenet; Edwin Geleijn; Marjoke Kruisselbrink; Marije Marsman; Liedewij Mj Janssen; Jelle P Ruurda; Donald L van der Peet; Jesse J Aarden; Cindy Veenhof; Marike van der Leeden Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 4.773