Literature DB >> 31542838

Perioperative monitoring of inguinal hernia patients with a smartphone application.

L van Hout1, W J V Bökkerink2,3, M S Ibelings2, P W H E Vriens2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient Reported Outcomes have become standard in the evaluation of inguinal hernia repair. However, the chosen outcomes remain heterogeneous and the measurements time-consuming or inadequate. Perioperative measurement of pain and recovery could benefit from the contemporary possibilities that mobile health applications offer.
METHODS: An application for smartphones and tablets was developed using the twitch crowdsourcing concept, classical questionnaires, experiences from randomised clinical trials, and patients' input.
RESULTS: Dichotomous questions and numeric rating scales, both pre- and post-operative, were implemented in the freely available Q1.6 application. Content, timing and frequencies were adapted to the inguinal hernia patient's daily life and assumed recovery. Certain combinations of answers were set as alert notifications to detect adverse events. Data are displayed on a web-based dashboard enabling real-time monitoring. Legal aspects were examined and taken into account. DISCUSSION: The Q1.6 inguinal hernia app is an innovative tool for perioperative monitoring of pain and recovery of inguinal hernia patients. Previous limitations of classical measurements such as a large heterogeneity, retrospective data recording and different forms of bias can be eliminated. The `big data´ generated in this manner might be used for large-scale research to improve inguinal hernia surgery. The Q1.6 platform is not only hernia specific; it is also an innovative tool to measure PROs in any other domain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Big data; Inguinal hernia; Patient monitoring; Smartphone application; m-Health

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31542838     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02053-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  22 in total

Review 1.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-10

2.  Missing data methods for dealing with missing items in quality of life questionnaires. A comparison by simulation of personal mean score, full information maximum likelihood, multiple imputation, and hot deck techniques applied to the SF-36 in the French 2003 decennial health survey.

Authors:  Hugo Peyre; Alain Leplège; Joël Coste
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Inguinal hernias.

Authors:  John T Jenkins; Patrick J O'Dwyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-02

4.  Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Muller; P D Cohen; M L Essink-Bot; M Fekkes; R Sanderman; M A Sprangers; A te Velde; E Verrips
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Invited commentary: Persistent pain after inguinal hernia repair: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  H Kehlet; R M Roumen; W Reinpold; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain--a call for uniform assessment.

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Bay-Nielsen; A Kingsnorth
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs.

Authors:  B Todd Heniford; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; Yuri W Novitsky; William W Hope; Kent W Kercher
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012.

Authors:  F E Muysoms; E B Deerenberg; E Peeters; F Agresta; F Berrevoet; G Campanelli; W Ceelen; G G Champault; F Corcione; D Cuccurullo; A C DeBeaux; U A Dietz; R J Fitzgibbons; J F Gillion; R-D Hilgers; J Jeekel; I Kyle-Leinhase; F Köckerling; V Mandala; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; R K J Simmermacher; V Schumpelick; M Smietański; M Walgenbach; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Using a mobile app for monitoring post-operative quality of recovery of patients at home: a feasibility study.

Authors:  John L Semple; Sarah Sharpe; M Lucas Murnaghan; John Theodoropoulos; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Replacing ambulatory surgical follow-up visits with mobile app home monitoring: modeling cost-effective scenarios.

Authors:  Kathleen A Armstrong; John L Semple; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical feasibility of the Q1.6 Inguinal Hernia application: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L van Hout; W J V Bökkerink; P W H E Vriens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.920

2.  Using an E-Health Application for Post-operative Monitoring After Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  J L Faessen; R van Vugt; R Veldhuizen; J H M B Stoot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Genitourinary Cancer Care: Re-envisioning the Future.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; James W F Catto; Antonio Finelli; Adam W Glaser; John L Gore; Stacy Loeb; Todd M Morgan; Alicia K Morgans; Nicolas Mottet; Richard Neal; Tim O'Brien; Anobel Y Odisho; Thomas Powles; Ted A Skolarus; Angela B Smith; Bernadett Szabados; Zachary Klaassen; Daniel E Spratt
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.