Literature DB >> 35840710

A comparison of bacterial colonization between nasogastric and orogastric enteral feeding tubes in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Kannikar Vongbhavit1,2, Lauren K Salinero3, Karen M Kalanetra3, Chad Masarweh3, Alice Yu3, Diana H Taft3, David A Mills3, Mark A Underwood4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Feeding tubes harbor microbial contaminants; studies to date have not explored differences between orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) tube biofilms. We sought to extend a previous analysis by comparing bacterial colonization by location (OG v NG) and by evaluating clinical factors that may affect tube bacterial populations. STUDY
DESIGN: The pharyngeal segments of 41 infant feeding tubes (14 OG and 27 NG) from 41 infants were analyzed by next generation 16 S rRNA sequencing on the MiSeq platform.
RESULTS: At the phylum level, Proteobacteria had the highest relative abundance of both OG and NG tubes. At the genus/species level, nine taxa differed significantly between OG and NG tubes. Alpha and beta diversity analyses showed significant differences between OG and NG tubes with relatively little contribution from clinical factors.
CONCLUSION: The route of feeding tube insertion (oral vs nasal) had a greater impact on bacterial colonization than the assessed clinical factors.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35840710     DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01452-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   3.225


  37 in total

Review 1.  The Landscape Ecology and Microbiota of the Human Nose, Mouth, and Throat.

Authors:  Diana M Proctor; David A Relman
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 21.023

2.  Dynamics of the nasal microbiota in infancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Moana Mika; Ines Mack; Insa Korten; Weihong Qi; Suzanne Aebi; Urs Frey; Philipp Latzin; Markus Hilty
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Nasogastric feeding tubes from a neonatal department yield high concentrations of potentially pathogenic bacteria- even 1 d after insertion.

Authors:  Sandra Meinich Petersen; Gorm Greisen; Karen Angeliki Krogfelt
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Prospective study of the incidence and complications of bacterial contamination of enteral feeding in neonates.

Authors:  John R Mehall; Cheryl A Kite; Daniel A Saltzman; Traci Wallett; Richard J Jackson; Samuel D Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Early Gut Colonization of Preterm Infants: Effect of Enteral Feeding Tubes.

Authors:  Marta Gómez; Laura Moles; Ana Melgar; Noelia Ureta; Gerardo Bustos; Leónides Fernández; Juan M Rodríguez; Esther Jiménez
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.839

6.  Enteral feeding tubes are a reservoir for nosocomial antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

Authors:  John R Mehall; Cheryl A Kite; Craig H Gilliam; Richard J Jackson; Samuel D Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 7.  The infant pharyngeal microbiomes: origin, impact and manipulation.

Authors:  Anastasia A Theodosiou; Robert B Dorey; Robert C Read; Christine E Jones
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.915

8.  Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Edward Hurrell; Eva Kucerova; Michael Loughlin; Juncal Caubilla-Barron; Anthony Hilton; Richard Armstrong; Craig Smith; Judith Grant; Shiu Shoo; Stephen Forsythe
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  The molecular characterisation of Escherichia coli K1 isolated from neonatal nasogastric feeding tubes.

Authors:  Aldukali Alkeskas; Pauline Ogrodzki; Mohamed Saad; Naqash Masood; Nasreddin R Rhoma; Karen Moore; Audrey Farbos; Konrad Paszkiewicz; Stephen Forsythe
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 10.  Respiratory Microbiome of New-Born Infants.

Authors:  David J Gallacher; Sailesh Kotecha
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.