Sandra Meinich Petersen1, Gorm Greisen1, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt2. 1. Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are vulnerable to pathogens and at risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or sepsis. Nasogastric feeding tubes (NG-tubes) might contaminate feeds given through them due to biofilm formation. We wanted to determine if there is a rationale in replacing NG-tubes more often to reduce contamination. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of used NG-tubes from a tertiary neonatal department. After removal, we flushed a 1-ml saline solution through the tube, determined the density of bacteria by culture, and related it to the duration of use and any probiotic administration through the tube. RESULTS: Out of the 94 NG-tubes, 89% yielded more than 1,000 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml bacteria, and 55% yielded the potentially pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae and/or Staphylococcus aureus. The mean concentration in the yield was 5.3 (SD: 2.1, maximum 9.4) log10CFU/ml. Neither the presence of contamination nor the density was associated with the time the NG-tube had been in use. Probiotic administration did not protect against contamination. CONCLUSION: NG-tubes yielded high densities of bacteria even within the first day of use. Further studies are needed to determine if changing the NG-tubes between meals or once a day will make a positive impact on tube contamination and clinical parameters.
BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are vulnerable to pathogens and at risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or sepsis. Nasogastric feeding tubes (NG-tubes) might contaminate feeds given through them due to biofilm formation. We wanted to determine if there is a rationale in replacing NG-tubes more often to reduce contamination. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of used NG-tubes from a tertiary neonatal department. After removal, we flushed a 1-ml saline solution through the tube, determined the density of bacteria by culture, and related it to the duration of use and any probiotic administration through the tube. RESULTS: Out of the 94 NG-tubes, 89% yielded more than 1,000 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml bacteria, and 55% yielded the potentially pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae and/or Staphylococcus aureus. The mean concentration in the yield was 5.3 (SD: 2.1, maximum 9.4) log10CFU/ml. Neither the presence of contamination nor the density was associated with the time the NG-tube had been in use. Probiotic administration did not protect against contamination. CONCLUSION: NG-tubes yielded high densities of bacteria even within the first day of use. Further studies are needed to determine if changing the NG-tubes between meals or once a day will make a positive impact on tube contamination and clinical parameters.
Authors: P Berthelot; F Grattard; H Patural; A Ros; H Jelassi-Saoudin; B Pozzetto; G Teyssier; F Lucht Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Amy McMillan; Melissa Dell; Michelle P Zellar; Sarah Cribby; Sarah Martz; Emilio Hong; Jennifer Fu; Ahmed Abbas; Thien Dang; Wayne Miller; Gregor Reid Journal: Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 5.268
Authors: María Carmen Collado; María Cernada; Josef Neu; Gaspar Pérez-Martínez; María Gormaz; Máximo Vento Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Brandon Brooks; Brian A Firek; Christopher S Miller; Itai Sharon; Brian C Thomas; Robyn Baker; Michael J Morowitz; Jillian F Banfield Journal: Microbiome Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Diana H Taft; Lauren K Salinero; Kannikar Vongbhavit; Karen M Kalanetra; Chad Masarweh; Alice Yu; Mark A Underwood; David A Mills Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.194
Authors: Kannikar Vongbhavit; Lauren K Salinero; Karen M Kalanetra; Chad Masarweh; Alice Yu; Diana H Taft; David A Mills; Mark A Underwood Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: J Jara Pérez; B Moreno-Sanz; I Castro Navarro; C Alba Rubio; B Chinea Jiménez; E Escribano Palomino; L Fernández Álvarez; J M Rodríguez; B Orgaz Martín; M Sáenz de Pipaón Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Anu Chacko; Ali Delbaz; Indra N Choudhury; Tanja Eindorf; Megha Shah; Christopher Godfrey; Matthew J Sullivan; James A St John; Glen C Ulett; Jenny A K Ekberg Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Leslie A Parker; Marina Magalhães; Katelyn Desorcy-Scherer; Monica Torrez Lamberti; Graciela L Lorca; Josef Neu Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-02-24
Authors: Gregory R Young; Christopher J van der Gast; Darren L Smith; Janet E Berrington; Nicholas D Embleton; Clare Lanyon Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.288