| Literature DB >> 35840553 |
Shannon N Tessier1,2, Reinier J de Vries1,2,3, Casie A Pendexter1,2,4, Stephanie E J Cronin1,2, Sinan Ozer1,2, Ehab O A Hafiz5, Siavash Raigani2,6, Joao Paulo Oliveira-Costa1,7, Benjamin T Wilks1,2, Manuela Lopera Higuita1,2, Thomas M van Gulik3, Osman Berk Usta1,2, Shannon L Stott1,7, Heidi Yeh6, Martin L Yarmush1,2,8, Korkut Uygun9,10, Mehmet Toner11,12.
Abstract
The limited preservation duration of organs has contributed to the shortage of organs for transplantation. Recently, a tripling of the storage duration was achieved with supercooling, which relies on temperatures between -4 and -6 °C. However, to achieve deeper metabolic stasis, lower temperatures are required. Inspired by freeze-tolerant animals, we entered high-subzero temperatures (-10 to -15 °C) using ice nucleators to control ice and cryoprotective agents (CPAs) to maintain an unfrozen liquid fraction. We present this approach, termed partial freezing, by testing gradual (un)loading and different CPAs, holding temperatures, and storage durations. Results indicate that propylene glycol outperforms glycerol and injury is largely influenced by storage temperatures. Subsequently, we demonstrate that machine perfusion enhancements improve the recovery of livers after freezing. Ultimately, livers that were partially frozen for 5-fold longer showed favorable outcomes as compared to viable controls, although frozen livers had lower cumulative bile and higher liver enzymes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35840553 PMCID: PMC9287450 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31490-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 17.694
Fig. 1The partial freezing protocol.
a Schematic overview of the partial freezing protocol showing the target perfusion temperature (top blue line) and pressures (bottom blue line) during the subsequent steps in the protocol. Livers were stored at either −10 or −15 °C. The numbers in circles match the explanation of the protocol in the introduction and Methods section. The perfusion solutions and the rate of change between the solutions are shown in blue boxes. SPS = subnomothermic preconditioning solution, HPS = hypothermic preloading solution, TS = thawing solution. See Supplementary Table S1 for the exact composition of the solutions. b Photos of the livers during the consecutive steps of the protocol. From left to right; SNMP preloading, HMP preloading, partial freezing, CPA unloading, functional recovery during SNMP, and start of simulated transplantation.
Fig. 2Effect of permeating cryoprotective agents on liver function, injury, and microscopic tissue structure after partial freezing at −10 °C for 24 h.
a Weight gain as percentage of the procurement weight. b Oxygen uptake. c Lactate concentration in the portal vein. d Bile production. e Tissue adenylate energy charge. f Aspartate aminotransferase concentration (AST) in the intrahepatic vena cava (IVC). g Light microscopy images of parenchymal liver wedges at the end of simulated transplantation (×40). Controls (gray) = 1 day hypothermic preservation, GLY glycerol (red), EG ethylene glycol (purple), PG propylene glycol (dark blue). Stars denote statistical significance (two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test): *0.01 < p < 0.05; **0.001 < p < 0.01; ***0.0001 < p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Boxes: floating bars (min to max), with a line at the mean. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5Effect of a clinical grade oxygenator on hepatocellular injury and microscopic tissue structure after partial freezing with propylene glycol at −15 °C for 1 and 5 days.
a Potassium concentration in the IVC. b Aspartate aminotransferase concentration (AST) in the IVC. c Alanine aminotransferase concentration (ALT) in the IVC. d Photos of the livers at the end of simulated transplantation. e Light microscopy images of parenchymal liver wedges at the end of simulated transplantation (×40). f Immunohistochemistry light microscopy images of Glut2 (a hepatocyte marker) at the end of simulated transplantation (×40). Control (gray) = 1 day hypothermic preservation, Clinical Oxy. Control (white) = 1 day hypothermic preservation perfused using a clinical grade oxygenator, PG = propylene glycol stored for 1 day at −15 °C (dark pink) or 5 days at −15 °C (light pink) perfused using a clinical grade oxygenator. Stars denote statistical significance (two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test): *0.01 < p < 0.05; **0.001 < p < 0.01; ***0.0001 < p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Boxes: Floating bars (min to max), with a line at the mean. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3Effect of storage temperature (−10 vs. −15 °C) and duration of storage (1 vs. 5 days) on liver function, injury, and microscopic tissue structure after partial freezing with propylene glycol.
a Weight gain as percentage of the procurement weight. b Oxygen uptake. c Lactate concentration in the portal vein. d Bile production. e Tissue adenylate energy charge. f Aspartate aminotransferase concentration (AST) in the IVC. g Light microscopy images of parenchymal liver wedges at the end of simulated transplantation (×40). Controls (gray) = 1 day hypothermic preservation, PG = propylene glycol stored for 1 day at −10 °C (dark blue), 1 day at −15 °C (blue), and 5 days at −15 °C (light blue). Stars denote statistical significance (two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test): *0.01 < p < 0.05; **0.001 < p < 0.01; ***0.0001 < p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Boxes: Floating bars (min to max), with a line at the mean. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4Effect of a clinical grade oxygenator on the recovery of liver function after partial freezing with propylene glycol at −15 °C for 1 and 5 days.
a Weight gain as percentage of the procurement weight. b Vascular resistance between the portal vein and the IVC. c Oxygen uptake. d Lactate concentration in the portal vein. e Bile production. f Tissue adenylate energy charge. Control (gray) = 1 day hypothermic preservation, Clinical Oxy. Control (white) = 1 day hypothermic preservation perfused using a clinical grade oxygenator, PG = propylene glycol stored for 1 day at −15 °C (dark pink) or 5 days at −15 °C (light pink) perfused using a clinical grade oxygenator. Stars denote statistical significance (two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test): *0.01 < p < 0.05; **0.001 < p < 0.01; ***0.0001 < p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Boxes: Floating bars (min to max), with a line at the mean. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Rodent livers that were partially frozen at −15 °C for 5 days are viable using our 6-our perfusion model as compared to transplantable controls and/or clinical liver perfusion data, representing a fivefold extension of preservation duration.
| Viability index | Partial freezing @ −15 °C for 5 days | Hypothermic control @ 4 °C for 1 day | Clinical EVLP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lactate | All livers metabolized lactate. Mean 2.65 ± 0.77 mM at 4 h and 1.843 ± 0.97 mM at 6 h. | No difference with frozen livers. | Organs metabolizing lactate to ≤2.5 mmol/L at 4 h[ |
| Bile production | All livers produced bile. | Total accumulation was higher than frozen livers. | Livers are producing bile[ |
| Glucose | All livers metabolized glucose. | No difference with frozen livers. | Metabolism of glucose[ |
| pH | pH decreased throughout perfusion. | pH was higher than frozen livers. | A pH ≥ 7.30[ |
| Flow/Resistance | All livers reached target flows. | No difference with frozen livers. | A hepatic arterial flow rate ≥150 mL/min and a portal venous flow rate ≥500 mL/min[ |
| Uniformity | Homogeneous perfusion achieved. | No difference with frozen livers. | Maintain a homogeneous perfusion[ |
| Injury markers | |||
| ALT | Mean 768 ± 206 U/L. | ALT lower than frozen livers. | ALT ≤ ~3000 U/L[ |
| AST | Mean 1270 ± 430 U/L. | AST lower than frozen livers. | Range 227–9200 U/L[ |
Controls are livers that were stored at 4 °C in the University of Wisconsin solution for 24 h. Perfusion-based metrics that are used in clinical ex vivo liver perfusion (EVLP) to define liver suitability for transplantation include lactate falling below 2.5 mM in combination with 2 out of 5 other indicators (bile production, glucose metabolism, venous/arterial flow rates, pH, and uniformity of perfusion)[54]. Rodent liver data and statistical results presented are from the final, 6-h time point of our simulated transplantation model, unless otherwise stated.