Literature DB >> 3583842

Comparative characteristics of predictive eye-hand tracking.

A Leist, H J Freund, B Cohen.   

Abstract

Eye and arm-hand movements were recorded in human subjects under three conditions. In the first a spot of light moved 30 deg back and forth sinusoidally at different frequencies. Limits of ocular pursuit were about 60 deg/sec at a frequency of about 1 Hz. In the second condition the arm and hand pointed a lever at the spot of light and pursued the moving visual target together with the eyes. The maximum velocity and frequency of ocular pursuit increased by about 20-30% with the addition of arm-hand movements. The arm and hand could move the lever faster than the eyes could pursue, but phase relations with regard to position between arm-hand movements and the visual target deteriorated at about 2 Hz when the eyes were unable to pursue the target. In the third condition the arm and hand drove the lever in self-paced movements, and the eyes pursued a target at the end of the lever. Maximum eye velocity increased slightly in two of three subjects in this condition, but no eye movements were made above 2.2 Hz. In contrast, self-paced arm and hand movements were made at frequencies up to 5 Hz and velocities of 400 deg/sec. The data are consistent with previous studies that indicate that the limits of ocular pursuit can be extended when eye movements are coupled to efferent signals and/or proprioceptive input from the skeletal motor system. The data also support previous findings of a dual-mode control system for the skeletal musculature during repetitive movements (Freund 1986).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3583842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Neurobiol        ISSN: 0721-9075


  8 in total

1.  Anticipatory control of hand and eye movements in humans during oculo-manual tracking.

Authors:  G R Barnes; J F Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Tracking performance with sinusoidal and irregular targets under different conditions of peripheral feedback.

Authors:  I Cathers; N O'Dwyer; P Neilson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Invariant temporal characteristics of manipulative hand movements.

Authors:  E Kunesch; F Binkofski; H J Freund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Informational constraints on spontaneous visuomotor entrainment.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Colleen Bucci; Michael J Richardson; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Optimization behavior of brainstem respiratory neurons. A cerebral neural network model.

Authors:  C S Poon
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Movement consistency during repetitive tool use action.

Authors:  Sandra Dorothee Starke; Chris Baber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sensorimotor delays in tracking may be compensated by negative feedback control of motion-extrapolated position.

Authors:  Maximilian G Parker; Andrew P Weightman; Sarah F Tyson; Bruce Abbott; Warren Mansell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Introducing a feedback training system for guided home rehabilitation.

Authors:  Fabian Kohler; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.