Literature DB >> 33136186

Sensorimotor delays in tracking may be compensated by negative feedback control of motion-extrapolated position.

Maximilian G Parker1, Andrew P Weightman2, Sarah F Tyson3, Bruce Abbott4, Warren Mansell5.   

Abstract

Sensorimotor delays dictate that humans act on outdated perceptual information. As a result, continuous manual tracking of an unpredictable target incurs significant response delays. However, no such delays are observed for repeating targets such as the sinusoids. Findings of this kind have led researchers to claim that the nervous system constructs predictive, probabilistic models of the world. However, a more parsimonious explanation is that visual perception of a moving target position is systematically biased by its velocity. The resultant extrapolated position could be compared with the cursor position and the difference canceled by negative feedback control, compensating sensorimotor delays. The current study tested whether a position extrapolation model fit human tracking of sinusoid (predictable) and pseudorandom (less predictable) targets better than the non-biased position control model, Twenty-eight participants tracked these targets and the two computational models were fit to the data at 60 fixed loop delay values (simulating sensorimotor delays). We observed that pseudorandom targets were tracked with a significantly greater phase delay than sinusoid targets. For sinusoid targets, the position extrapolation model simulated tracking results more accurately for loop delays longer than 120 ms, thereby confirming its ability to compensate for sensorimotor delays. However, for pseudorandom targets, this advantage arose only after 300 ms, indicating that velocity information is unlikely to be exploited in this way during the tracking of less predictable targets. We conclude that negative feedback control of position is a parsimonious model for tracking pseudorandom targets and that negative feedback control of extrapolated position is a parsimonious model for tracking sinusoidal targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action control; Pursuit tracking; Sensorimotor delay

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33136186      PMCID: PMC7884356          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05962-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  54 in total

1.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Temporal relation of population activity in visual areas MT/MST and in primary motor cortex during visually guided tracking movements.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kruse; Sabine Dannenberg; Raimund Kleiser; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  How position, velocity, and temporal information combine in the prospective control of catching: data and model.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; C Lieke E Peper; Daniel Bullock; Peter J Beek
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Analyzing a complex visuomotor tracking task with brain-electrical event related potentials.

Authors:  Holger Hill; Markus Raab
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  A systematic evaluation of the evidence for perceptual control theory in tracking studies.

Authors:  Maximilian G Parker; Andrew B S Willett; Sarah F Tyson; Andrew P Weightman; Warren Mansell
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Anticipation in feedback-delayed manual tracking of a chaotic oscillator.

Authors:  Nigel Stepp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Visuomotor transformation for interception: catching while fixating.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.