Literature DB >> 35837596

Overview of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017.

Charles O Stanier1, R Bradley Pierce2, Maryam Abdi-Oskouei1, Zachariah E Adelman3, Jay Al-Saadi4, Hariprasad D Alwe5, Timothy H Bertram6, Gregory R Carmichael1, Megan B Christiansen1, Patricia A Cleary7, Alan C Czarnetzki8, Angela F Dickens9, Marta A Fuoco10, Dagen D Hughes1, Joseph P Hupy11, Scott J Janz12, Laura M Judd4, Donna Kenski3, Matthew G Kowalewski12, Russell W Long13, Dylan B Millet5, Gordon Novak6, Behrooz Roozitalab1, Stephanie L Shaw14, Elizabeth A Stone1, James Szykman13, Lukas Valin13, Michael Vermeuel6, Timothy J Wagner2, Andrew R Whitehill13, David J Williams13.   

Abstract

The Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017 (LMOS 2017) was a collaborative multiagency field study targeting ozone chemistry, meteorology, and air quality observations in the southern Lake Michigan area. The primary objective of LMOS 2017 was to provide measurements to improve air quality modeling of the complex meteorological and chemical environment in the region. LMOS 2017 science questions included spatiotemporal assessment of nitrogen oxides (NO x = NO + NO2) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emission sources and their influence on ozone episodes; the role of lake breezes; contribution of new remote sensing tools such as GeoTASO, Pandora, and TEMPO to air quality management; and evaluation of photochemical grid models. The observing strategy included GeoTASO on board the NASA UC-12 aircraft capturing NO2 and formaldehyde columns, an in situ profiling aircraft, two ground-based coastal enhanced monitoring locations, continuous NO2 columns from coastal Pandora instruments, and an instrumented research vessel. Local photochemical ozone production was observed on 2 June, 9-12 June, and 14-16 June, providing insights on the processes relevant to state and federal air quality management. The LMOS 2017 aircraft mapped significant spatial and temporal variation of NO2 emissions as well as polluted layers with rapid ozone formation occurring in a shallow layer near the Lake Michigan surface. Meteorological characteristics of the lake breeze were observed in detail and measurements of ozone, NOx, nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide, VOC, oxygenated VOC (OVOC), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) composition were conducted. This article summarizes the study design, directs readers to the campaign data repository, and presents a summary of findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality; Aircraft observations; Coastal meteorology; Ozone; Satellite observations; Sea breezes

Year:  2021        PMID: 35837596      PMCID: PMC9275376          DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0061.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc        ISSN: 0003-0007            Impact factor:   9.116


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data.

Authors:  Laura M Judd; Jassim A Al-Saadi; Scott J Janz; Matthew G Kowalewski; R Bradley Pierce; James J Szykman; Lukas C Valin; Robert Swap; Alexander Cede; Moritz Mueller; Martin Tiefengraber; Nader Abuhassan; David Williams
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The Dawn of Geostationary Air Quality Monitoring: Case Studies from Seoul and Los Angeles.

Authors:  Laura Judd; Jassim Al-Saadi; Lukas Valin; R Bradley Pierce; Kai Yang; Scott Janz; Matt Kowalewski; James Szykman; Martin Tiefengraber; Moritz Mueller
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2018

3.  The Ozone Water-Land Environmental Transition Study (OWLETS): An Innovative Strategy for Understanding Chesapeake Bay Pollution Events.

Authors:  John T Sullivan; Timothy Berkoff; Guillaume Gronoff; Travis Knepp; Margaret Pippin; Danette Allen; Laurence Twigg; Robert Swap; Maria Tzortziou; Anne M Thompson; Ryan M Stauffer; Glenn M Wolfe; James Flynn; Sally E Pusede; Laura Judd; William Moore; Barry D Baker; Jay Al-Saadi; Thomas J McGee
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 8.766

4.  Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO).

Authors:  P Zoogman; X Liu; R M Suleiman; W F Pennington; D E Flittner; J A Al-Saadi; B B Hilton; D K Nicks; M J Newchurch; J L Carr; S J Janz; M R Andraschko; A Arola; B D Baker; B P Canova; C Chan Miller; R C Cohen; J E Davis; M E Dussault; D P Edwards; J Fishman; A Ghulam; G González Abad; M Grutter; J R Herman; J Houck; D J Jacob; J Joiner; B J Kerridge; J Kim; N A Krotkov; L Lamsal; C Li; A Lindfors; R V Martin; C T McElroy; C McLinden; V Natraj; D O Neil; C R Nowlan; E J O'Sullivan; P I Palmer; R B Pierce; M R Pippin; A Saiz-Lopez; R J D Spurr; J J Szykman; O Torres; J P Veefkind; B Veihelmann; H Wang; J Wang; K Chance
Journal:  J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Characterization of ground-based atmospheric pollution and meteorology sampling stations during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017.

Authors:  Austin G Doak; Megan B Christiansen; Hariprasad D Alwe; Timothy H Bertram; Gregory Carmichael; Patricia Cleary; Alan C Czarnetzki; Angela F Dickens; Mark Janssen; Donna Kenski; Dylan B Millet; Gordon A Novak; Bradley R Pierce; Elizabeth A Stone; Russell W Long; Michael P Vermeuel; Timothy J Wagner; Lukas Valin; Charles O Stanier
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.636

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of the Meteorology and Air Quality Conditions From Multiscale WRF-CMAQ Simulations for the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS).

Authors:  Ana Torres-Vazquez; Jonathan Pleim; Robert Gilliam; George Pouliot
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  NOx and O3 Trends at U.S. Non-Attainment Areas for 1995-2020: Influence of COVID-19 Reductions and Wildland Fires on Policy-Relevant Concentrations.

Authors:  Daniel A Jaffe; Matthew Ninneman; Hei Chun Chan
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.