Literature DB >> 33014172

Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data.

Laura M Judd1,2, Jassim A Al-Saadi1, Scott J Janz3, Matthew G Kowalewski3,4, R Bradley Pierce5, James J Szykman6, Lukas C Valin6, Robert Swap3, Alexander Cede7, Moritz Mueller7,8, Martin Tiefengraber7,8, Nader Abuhassan3,9, David Williams6.   

Abstract

NASA deployed the GeoTASO airborne UV-Visible spectrometer in May-June 2017 to produce high resolution (approximately 250 × 250 m) gapless NO2 datasets over the western shore of Lake Michigan and over the Los Angeles Basin. The results collected show that the airborne tropospheric vertical column retrievals compare well with ground-based Pandora spectrometer column NO2 observations (r2=0.91 and slope of 1.03). Apparent disagreements between the two measurements can be sensitive to the coincidence criteria and are often associated with large local variability, including rapid temporal changes and spatial heterogeneity that may be observed differently by the sunward viewing Pandora observations. The gapless mapping strategy executed during the 2017 GeoTASO flights provides data suitable for averaging to coarser areal resolutions to simulate satellite retrievals. As simulated satellite pixel area increases to values typical of TEMPO, TROPOMI, and OMI, the agreement with Pandora measurements degraded, particularly for the most polluted columns as localized large pollution enhancements observed by Pandora and GeoTASO are spatially averaged with nearby less-polluted locations within the larger area representative of the satellite spatial resolutions (aircraft-to-Pandora slope: TEMPO scale=0.88; TROPOMI scale=0.77; OMI scale=0.57). In these two regions, Pandora and TEMPO or TROPOMI have the potential to compare well at least up to pollution scales of 30×1015 molecules cm-2. Two publicly available OMI tropospheric NO2 retrievals are both found to be biased low with respect to these Pandora observations. However, the agreement improves when higher resolution a priori inputs are used for the tropospheric air mass factor calculation (NASA V3 Standard Product slope = 0.18 and Berkeley High Resolution Product slope=0.30). Overall, this work explores best practices for satellite validation strategies with Pandora direct-sun observations by showing the sensitivity to product spatial resolution and demonstrating how the high spatial resolution NO2 data retrieved from airborne spectrometers, such as GeoTASO, can be used with high temporal resolution ground-based column observations to evaluate the influence of spatial heterogeneity on validation results.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33014172      PMCID: PMC7526561          DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech        ISSN: 1867-1381            Impact factor:   4.176


  5 in total

1.  Megacity emissions and lifetimes of nitrogen oxides probed from space.

Authors:  Steffen Beirle; K Folkert Boersma; Ulrich Platt; Mark G Lawrence; Thomas Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effects of local meteorology and aerosols on ozone and nitrogen dioxide retrievals from OMI and pandora spectrometers in Maryland, USA during DISCOVER-AQ 2011.

Authors:  Andra J Reed; Anne M Thompson; Debra E Kollonige; Douglas K Martins; Maria A Tzortziou; Jay R Herman; Timothy A Berkoff; Nader K Abuhassan; Alexander Cede
Journal:  J Atmos Chem       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.158

3.  The Dawn of Geostationary Air Quality Monitoring: Case Studies from Seoul and Los Angeles.

Authors:  Laura Judd; Jassim Al-Saadi; Lukas Valin; R Bradley Pierce; Kai Yang; Scott Janz; Matt Kowalewski; James Szykman; Martin Tiefengraber; Moritz Mueller
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2018

4.  Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections of O2-O2 collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at atmospherically relevant pressure.

Authors:  Ryan Thalman; Rainer Volkamer
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO).

Authors:  P Zoogman; X Liu; R M Suleiman; W F Pennington; D E Flittner; J A Al-Saadi; B B Hilton; D K Nicks; M J Newchurch; J L Carr; S J Janz; M R Andraschko; A Arola; B D Baker; B P Canova; C Chan Miller; R C Cohen; J E Davis; M E Dussault; D P Edwards; J Fishman; A Ghulam; G González Abad; M Grutter; J R Herman; J Houck; D J Jacob; J Joiner; B J Kerridge; J Kim; N A Krotkov; L Lamsal; C Li; A Lindfors; R V Martin; C T McElroy; C McLinden; V Natraj; D O Neil; C R Nowlan; E J O'Sullivan; P I Palmer; R B Pierce; M R Pippin; A Saiz-Lopez; R J D Spurr; J J Szykman; O Torres; J P Veefkind; B Veihelmann; H Wang; J Wang; K Chance
Journal:  J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Overview of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017.

Authors:  Charles O Stanier; R Bradley Pierce; Maryam Abdi-Oskouei; Zachariah E Adelman; Jay Al-Saadi; Hariprasad D Alwe; Timothy H Bertram; Gregory R Carmichael; Megan B Christiansen; Patricia A Cleary; Alan C Czarnetzki; Angela F Dickens; Marta A Fuoco; Dagen D Hughes; Joseph P Hupy; Scott J Janz; Laura M Judd; Donna Kenski; Matthew G Kowalewski; Russell W Long; Dylan B Millet; Gordon Novak; Behrooz Roozitalab; Stephanie L Shaw; Elizabeth A Stone; James Szykman; Lukas Valin; Michael Vermeuel; Timothy J Wagner; Andrew R Whitehill; David J Williams
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 9.116

2.  Comprehensive evaluations of diurnal NO2 measurements during DISCOVER-AQ 2011: effects of resolution-dependent representation of NO x emissions.

Authors:  Jianfeng Li; Yuhang Wang; Ruixiong Zhang; Charles Smeltzer; Andrew Weinheimer; Jay Herman; K Folkert Boersma; Edward A Celarier; Russell W Long; James J Szykman; Ruben Delgado; Anne M Thompson; Travis N Knepp; Lok N Lamsal; Scott J Janz; Matthew G Kowalewski; Xiong Liu; Caroline R Nowlan
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 7.197

3.  Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution in a Coastal Urban Environment: The Role of Sea Breezes, and Implications of Their Representation for Remote Sensing of Local Air Quality.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Geddes; Bo Wang; Dan Li
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 5.217

4.  TROPOMI NO2 in the United States: A Detailed Look at the Annual Averages, Weekly Cycles, Effects of Temperature, and Correlation With Surface NO2 Concentrations.

Authors:  Daniel L Goldberg; Susan C Anenberg; Gaige Hunter Kerr; Arash Mohegh; Zifeng Lu; David G Streets
Journal:  Earths Future       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 7.495

5.  NO2 retrievals from NOAA-20 OMPS: Algorithm, evaluation, and observations of drastic changes during COVID-19.

Authors:  Xinzhou Huang; Kai Yang; Shobha Kondragunta; Zigang Wei; Lucas Valin; James Szykman; Mitch Goldberg
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.755

6.  COVID-19 pandemic reveals persistent disparities in nitrogen dioxide pollution.

Authors:  Gaige Hunter Kerr; Daniel L Goldberg; Susan C Anenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Global fine-scale changes in ambient NO2 during COVID-19 lockdowns.

Authors:  Matthew J Cooper; Randall V Martin; Melanie S Hammer; Pieternel F Levelt; Pepijn Veefkind; Lok N Lamsal; Nickolay A Krotkov; Jeffrey R Brook; Chris A McLinden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 69.504

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.