Literature DB >> 35837319

Long-Term Survival in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer Who Did Not Undergo Prophylactic Central Lymph Node Dissection: A SEER-Based Study.

Jun Long Song1, Ling Rui Li1, Zhi Liang Xu1, Juan Juan Li1, Sheng Rong Sun1, Chuang Chen1.   

Abstract

Background: The role of prophylactic central lymph node dissection (pCLND) for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) remains contentious, and the impact of pCLND on long-term patient outcomes is unclear.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was performed. Patients diagnosed with PTC who did not undergo pCLND between 2004 and 2015 were included in this study, and patients with pN0 PTC who underwent CLND were included as the control group. The researchers calculated the subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) using the Fine-Gray model and the hazard ratio (HR) using the Cox proportional hazards regression to compare Thyroid cancer-specific survival (TCSS) and overall survival (OS) of the different groups.
Results: A total of 38,205 T1-2cN0 PTC patients without pCLND were eligible for the study entry, and 24,157 patients with T1-2pN0 PTC patients who had received CLND were included as the control group. The actuarial 10-year TCSS and OS rates of patients without pCLND were 99.53% and 92.77%, respectively. Patients without pCLND had similar TCSS compared with the control group after adjusting for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, thyroid surgery, and radiation (SHR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.95 - 1.93). However, patients without pCLND had a significantly poorer OS than the control group (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.26 - 1.51). Conclusions: Patients without pCLND had similar TCSS compared with the control group after adjusting for confounders but had significantly poorer OS. Whether the OS disparities were attributed to pCLND or other factors still needs further study. Copyright 2022, Song et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papillary thyroid cancer; Prophylactic central lymph node dissection; SEER database; Survival

Year:  2022        PMID: 35837319      PMCID: PMC9239496          DOI: 10.14740/wjon1483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Oncol        ISSN: 1920-4531


Introduction

The incidence of thyroid cancer in China has increased significantly over the past two decades [1]. Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most common histologic subtype of thyroid cancer, accounting for 90% of new cases, and it has the best prognosis. Increased detection of subclinical thyroid cancers by increased utilization of ultrasonography and fine-needle biopsies may account for the rise in the incidence of thyroid cancer [2]. Surgery is the preferred treatment for PTC. Most patients with PTC will undergo surgical treatment consisting of thyroidectomy with or without lymph node dissection, as dictated by the extent of disease noted during preoperative evaluation and intraoperative inspection. For patients with suspicion of cervical lymph node metastases, a therapeutic compartment-orientated neck dissection of the involved lymph node basins should be included. However, for patients without any signs of cervical lymph node metastases, prophylactic central lymph node dissection (pCLND) is still under investigation [3-5]. The prevalence of lymph node metastases has been reported to be high in the central compartment (level VI). Clinically evident nodal metastases could be evaluated by clinical examination and preoperative ultrasound. However, only 20-30% of nodal metastases could be detected by clinical examination or preoperative ultrasound [6-8]. These methods have been shown to be unreliable in determining the presence of microscopic lymph node metastases. Lymph node metastases of level VI are more frequently occult and are not detectable preoperatively. Therefore, some cN0 PTC might have central lymph node metastases. Studies have reported that over 24% of lymph node metastases were detected in pCLND [9, 10]. Lymph node metastases have been reported to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence, and there are studies showing that their surgical removal improves survival rates [11-13]. The role of pCLND remains contentious. Many clinicians have suggested routine pCLND in PTC patients, particularly in China and Japan [14]. Routine pCLND may improve the accuracy of PTC nodal staging, reduce the burden of disease through excision of lymph node metastasis, and subsequently decrease the risk of loco-regional recurrence [15-17]. However, most PTC patients have a good prognosis, and mortality is low. When considering pCLND, the complication rates, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypoparathyroidism associated with more extensive surgery that may affect the quality of life, should be taken into account [15, 18]. The risk factors for lymph node metastases include age at diagnosis, size of the primary tumor, and extrathyroidal extension [19-21]. In our clinical practice, patients with larger tumors and extrathyroidal extensions more frequently receive pCLND, while patients with low-risk tumors are less likely to receive it. It is generally accepted that pCLND does not change the overall prognosis but may affect recurrence rates. Many studies have evaluated the impact of pCLND on recurrence rates, but there are no convincing studies to evaluate the impact of pCLND on the survival of PTC. Therefore, we carried out this study to detect the impact of pCLND on the survival of PTC using data extracted from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Materials and Methods

Data source and population

The SEER database is one of the most representative cancer-related databases and provides information on cancer incidence and survival derived from population-based cancer registries covering about one-third of the US population. For this study, SEER-18 data, which included 18 population-based cancer registries, were utilized. These data are available to the public with a signed data use agreement form (https://seer.cancer.gov/data/). Upon acceptance of the agreement, SEER*Stat software and data files were downloaded directly from the SEER website. Case lists were generated using SEER*Stat 8.3.9.2. Data on thyroid cancer between 2004 and 2015 were obtained from the SEER database. SEER routinely collects information on procedures for removal, biopsy, or aspiration of regional lymph nodes performed during the initial workup or first course of therapy. The scope of regional lymph node surgery was used to determine whether the patients received lymph node dissection. If the scope of the regional lymph node surgery was unknown, the regional nodes examined by the pathologist were used to further determine the status of the lymph node dissection. Because most of the patients with T3-4 (AJCC, sixth edition) tumors would receive pCLND in clinical practice, in this study, we mainly evaluated the survival of those PTC patients with AJCC T1-2 disease and without pCLND. The eligibility criteria were as follows: 1) year of diagnosis from 2004 to 2015; 2) diagnosed with PTC; 3) staged with AJCC T1-2N0 disease; and 4) without lymph node removal. A control group consisting of PTC patients with lymph node removal was also established. The SEER database did not provide information on whether CLND was pCLND or therapeutic CLND. Therefore, those patients who received CLND and were staged with T1-2N0 disease were included as the control group. The eligibility criteria were as follows: 1) year of diagnosis from 2004 to 2015; 2) diagnosed with PTC; 3) staged with AJCC T1-2N0 disease; and 4) lymph node removal. Patients with no record of survival time were excluded. The following demographic characteristics and clinical features for PTC were recorded: age at diagnosis, sex, race (white, black, or other), histological classification of thyroid cancer, AJCC tumor stage (T1, T2), multifocality (solitary, multifocal), thyroid surgery, regional lymph node surgery, and radiation. The extent of thyroid surgery was classified into lobectomy with isthmus or less (including lobectomy, isthmectomy, local excision, and others) and more than lobectomy with isthmus (including removal of a lobe and partial removal of the contralateral lobe, and subtotal or near total or total thyroidectomy). Radiotherapy included radioiodine therapy, beam radiation, and brachytherapy. Thyroid cancer-specific survival (TCSS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcomes of this study. Follow-up time was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis of thyroid cancer to death by any cause, lost to follow-up, or end of follow-up, whichever occurred first. Cause of death was defined according to the International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes and classified as attributable to the index cancer and other causes (https://seer.cancer.gov/causespecific/).

Statistical analysis

The demographic characteristics and clinical features of the patients in the different groups were compared using descriptive statistics. A Chi-square test was conducted to compare frequency distributions for categorical variables, and a two-tailed t-test was used to compare continuous variables, where appropriate. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves, and the log-rank test was performed to compare unadjusted TCSS and OS between the different groups. Because most of the PTC patients died from causes other than thyroid, to take enough account of the competing risks, a univariate and multivariate Fine and Gray competing-risk regression model, a semi-proportional model that provides estimates of the cumulative incidence function of each event as a log subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR), was built to analyze TCSS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression to compare the OS between different groups. In the multivariate analyses, the researchers adjusted for confounders, including age, sex, race, T stage, multifocality, thyroid surgery, and radiation. Subgroup analysis for TCSS and OS was performed according to age group, sex, and T stage. All statistical calculations were performed using Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). All P values were two-tailed. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. The work has been reported in line with the STROCSS criteria [22].

Ethical compliance with human/animal study

The SEER program collects data from population-based cancer registries with anonymous information. The SEER is a publicly available database and data extracted from SEER was deemed “non-human study” by the North Shore LIJ IRB committee, thus no ethical approval is required.

Results

Baseline characteristics

In total, 38,205 PTC patients without pCLND were eligible for the study between 2004 and 2015, and 24,157 patients with T1-2N0 PTC patients who had received CLND were included as the control group. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the included patients in the different groups. The patients without pCLND were much older at the diagnosis of thyroid cancer than the control group (mean age: 50.02 vs. 46.98; P < 0.001). A higher proportion of females received CLND than males (P < 0.001). White patients were more likely to receive CLND than other races (P < 0.001). More patients with multifocal disease received CLND (P < 0.001). In the CLND group, more patients received larger thyroid resection scope (P < 0.01), and more patients with CLND received radiation (P < 0.001). Regarding the tumor stage, no significant difference was identified between patients with and without CLND (P = 0.267).
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of Thyroid Cancer Patients According to Prophylactic Central Lymph Node Dissection

CharacteristicsWithout CLNDWith CLNDP
Patients number38,205 (61.26)24,157 (38.74)/
Age (mean ± SD)50.02 ± 14.1346.98 ± 13.83< 0.001
  < 5523,686 (62.00)16,997 (70.36)< 0.001
  ≥ 5514,519 (38.00)7,160 (29.64)
Sex
  Male7,414 (19.41)3,753 (15.54)<0.001
  Female30,791 (80.38)20,404 (84.46)
Race
  White30,495 (79.82)20,609 (85.25)< 0.001
  Black3,492 (9.14)990 (4.10)
  Other4,218 (11.04)2,558 (10.59)
T stage
  T131,419 (82.24)19,480 (80.64)< 0.001
  T26,786 (17.76)4,667 (19.36)
Multifocal
  No25,313 (66.26)14,013 (58.01)< 0.001
  Yes12,522 (32.78)9,969 (41.27)
  Unknown370 (0.97)175 (0.72)
Surgery
  Total thyroidectomy27,550 (72.11)20,607 (85.30)< 0.001
  Other surgery10,655 (27.83)3,536 (14.64)
  Unknown24 (0.06)14 (0.06)
Radiation
  No25,177 (65.90)14,513 (60.08)< 0.001
  Yes13,028 (34.10)9,644 (39.92)
Median follow-up (months)8175/
Survival status
  Alive36,302 (95.02)23,515 (97.34)< 0.001
  Death from thyroid cancer122 (0.32)44 (0.18)
  Death from other causes1,781 (4.66)598 (2.48)

CLND: central lymph node dissection; SD: standard deviation.

CLND: central lymph node dissection; SD: standard deviation.

Survival analysis

After a median of 79 months of follow-up, a total of 2,545 (4.08%) patients died at the end of the study follow-up. In the group of patients without pCLND, 1,903 (4.98%) had died, whereas 642 (2.66%) patients in the control group had died. Among the 2,545 patients who died, only 166 (6.52%) patients died from thyroid cancer, and 2,527 (93.48%) patients died due to other causes. The actuarial 10-year TCSS rate of patients without pCLND was 99.53% (95% confidence interval (CI): 99.42% - 99.62%), whereas it was 99.68% (95% CI: 99.55% - 99.78%) for patients with CLND. The actuarial 10-year OS of patients without pCLND was 92.77% (95% CI: 92.41% - 93.13%), whereas it was 95.73% (95% CI: 95.33% - 96.09%) for patients with CLND. Kaplan-Meier plots were generated to compare the TCSS and OS of the different groups, and the results are shown in Figure 1. In general, patients without pCLND were more likely to experience all-cause mortality and thyroid cancer-specific mortality than the control group. A univariate and multivariate Fine and Gray competing-risk regression model was used to analyze the TCSS. As shown in Table 2, in the univariate model, patients without pCLND had significantly poorer TCSS than the control group (patients without pCLND vs. the control group: SHR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12 - 2.23). In further multivariate analyses, patients without pCLND had similar TCSS to patients with CLND after adjusting for confounders (patients without pCLND vs. the control group: SHR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.95 - 1.93). We further analyzed the OS differences between the different groups. Table 3 summarizes the crude and adjusted HRs (95% CI) for OS between patients without pCLND and patients with CLND. In the univariate analysis, patients without pCLND had significantly poorer OS than the control group (patients without pCLND vs. the control group: HR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.57 - 1.88). After adjusting for confounders, patients without pCLND still had poorer OS than patients with CLND (patients without pCLND vs. the control group: HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.26 - 1.51).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curves for thyroid cancer-specific survival (TCSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with and without prophylactic central lymph node dissection (pCLND). (a) Thyroid cancer-specific survival. (b) Overall survival.

Table 2

Univariate Variate and Multivariate Fine-Gray Competing Risk Model for Thyroid Cancer Specific Survival

CharacteristicsSHRPaSHRaP
Age
  < 551 (reference)1 (reference)
  ≥ 556.91 (4.78 - 10.00)< 0.0016.87 (4.74 - 9.95)< 0.001
Sex
  Female1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Male2.09 (1.50 - 2.91)< 0.0011.53 (1.10 - 2.14)0.012
Race
  White1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Black1.30 (0.76 - 2.22)0.3351.25 (0.73 - 2.15)0.411
  Other0.59 (0.31 - 1.12)0.1060.65 (0.34 - 1.24)0.187
Tumor size
  T11 (reference)1 (reference)
  T22.04 (1.47 - 2.84)< 0.0012.14 (1.51 - 3.03)< 0.001
Multifocal
  No1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Yes0.76 (0.19 - 3.07)0.7010.87 (0.19 - 4.06)0.859
  Unknown0.89 (0.22 - 3.61)0.8660.96 (0.20 - 4.53)0.957
Surgery
  Total thyroidectomy1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Other surgery0.94 (0.65 - 1.35)0.7200.93 (0.63 - 1.38)0.726
  Unknown7.57 (1.04 - 54.89)0.04510.19 (1.15 - 90.21)0.037
Radiation
  No1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Yes1.20 (0.88 - 1.63)0.2461.15 (0.81 - 1.64)0.433
CLND
  Yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
  No1.58 (1.12 - 2.23)0.0101.35 (0.95 - 1.93)0.098

aAdjusted for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, surgery of thyroid and radiation. SHR: subdistribution hazard ratio; aSHR: adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio; CLND: central lymph node dissection.

Table 3

Univariate and Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Regression for Overall Survival

CharacteristicsHRPaHRaP
Age
  < 551 (reference)1 (reference)
  ≥ 556.35 (5.80 - 6.95)< 0.0015.85 (5.33 - 6.41)< 0.001
Sex
  Female1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Male1.93 (1.77 - 2.10)< 0.0011.54 (1.41 - 1.68)< 0.001
Race
  White1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Black1.63 (1.44 - 1.85)< 0.0011.59 (1.41 - 1.81)< 0.001
  Other0.51 (0.43 - 0.61)< 0.0010.56 (0.47 - 0.67)< 0.001
Tumor size
  T11 (reference)1 (reference)
  T21.02 (0.93 - 1.13)0.6451.24 (1.12 - 1.37)< 0.001
Multifocal
  No1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Yes1.01 (0.69 - 1.19)0.0350.99 (0.67 - 1.46)0.975
  Unknown0.92 (0.62 - 1.36)0.6820.98 (0.66 - 1.45)0.915
Surgery
  Total thyroidectomy1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Other surgery1.29 (1.19 - 1.41)< 0.0011.06 (0.97 - 1.16)0.218
  Unknown1.54 (0.50 - 4.79)0.4532.13 (0.68 - 6.70)0.194
Radiation
  No1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Yes0.69 (0.63 - 0.75)< 0.0010.79 (0.72 - 0.87)< 0.001
CLND
  Yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
  No1.72 (1.57 - 1.88)< 0.0011.38 (1.26 - 1.51)< 0.001

aAdjusted for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, surgery of thyroid and radiation. HR: hazard ratio; aHR: adjusted hazard ratio. CLND: central lymph node dissection.

Kaplan-Meier curves for thyroid cancer-specific survival (TCSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with and without prophylactic central lymph node dissection (pCLND). (a) Thyroid cancer-specific survival. (b) Overall survival. aAdjusted for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, surgery of thyroid and radiation. SHR: subdistribution hazard ratio; aSHR: adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio; CLND: central lymph node dissection. aAdjusted for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, surgery of thyroid and radiation. HR: hazard ratio; aHR: adjusted hazard ratio. CLND: central lymph node dissection. The researchers also carried out further stratified analyses of different age groups, sex, and different T stages for TCSS and OS. As shown in Table 4, patients without pCLND had similar TCSS compared with the control group in different subgroups, adjusted for confounders. Patients without pCLND had poor OS in all subgroups after adjusting for confounders.
Table 4

Assessing the Survival of Patients Without pCLND Using Multivariate Fine-Gray Model for TCSS and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model for OS in Different Subgroups

SubgroupsTCSSaPOSaP
Age
  < 55
    CLND/yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
    CLND/no1.09 (0.53 - 2.27)0.8111.22 (1.03 - 1.45)0.020
  ≥ 55
    CLND/yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
    CLND/no1.45 (0.96 - 2.19)0.0791.44 (1.29 - 1.61)< 0.001
Sex
  Male
    CLND/yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
    CLND/no1.75 (0.85 - 3.61)0.1311.25 (1.05 - 1.49)0.011
  Female
    CLND/yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
    CLND/no1.21 (0.80 - 1.82)0.3761.43 (1.28 - 1.59)< 0.001
T stage
  T1
    CLND/yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
    CLND/no1.30 (0.84 - 2.03)0.2401.38 (1.25 - 1.53)< 0.001
  T2
    CLND/yes1 (reference)1 (reference)
    CLND/no1.44 (0.78 - 2.64)0.2421.35 (1.11 - 1.66)0.003

aAdjusted for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, surgery of thyroid and radiation. TCSS: thyroid cancer-specific survival; OS: overall survival; CLND: central lymph node dissection.

aAdjusted for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, surgery of thyroid and radiation. TCSS: thyroid cancer-specific survival; OS: overall survival; CLND: central lymph node dissection.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study that was performed with the aim of exploring the long-term survival of PTC patients without pCLND. Due to the excellent outcomes, low recurrence rate, and mortality rate of PTC, it is not feasible to conduct a large prospective randomized clinical study to clarify this issue. We carried out this population-based, large-scale retrospective study to further detect the survival rate of PTC patients without pCLND. In our study, patients without pCLND were much older. The old patients were more likely to have comorbidities and the surgeons tended to perform less extensive surgery if they had no obvious central lymph node involvement. And patients without pCLND were also less likely to undergo total thyroidectomy in our study. Furthermore, more T1 and unifocal tumors were observed in patients without pCLND. These tumors had a low risk of metastasis to lymph nodes. In further survival analysis, patients without pCLND had similar TCSS compared with the control group after adjusting for age, sex, race, tumor stage, multifocality, thyroid surgery, and radiation (SHR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.95 - 1.93), but they had significantly poorer OS (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.26 - 1.51). In the stratified analyses, the same trend was observed in all subgroups. One of the most controversial issues in the therapy of PTC is pCLND. The performance of pCLND in clinically node-negative PTC varied a lot in different thyroid centers. Occult lymph node metastasis is common in PTC, especially in the central compartment. Theoretically, pCLND could remove occult metastasis and decrease the recurrence rate. Another potential benefit of pCLND has been to more accurately stage patients, which may affect radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment [23]. Some studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with nodal dissection. Medas et al found that occult lymph node metastases were found in 25.3% of patients in the pCLND group, and occult lymph node metastases resulted as a significant negative prognostic factor for recurrence [10]. In a meta-analysis carried out by Zhao et al, patients with pCLND had a significantly reduced risk of locoregional recurrence [17]. However, many other studies showed that pCLND did not improve tumor control and had a higher risk of developing complications, such as hypocalcemia [24-26]. A prospective randomized controlled study by Viola et al concluded that pCLND did not reduce the central neck recurrence rate, with the incidence of permanent hypoparathyroidism increasing significantly [24]. Due to the excellent outcomes of PTC, most studies have not demonstrated significant differences in TCSS [27-29]. In our analysis, we demonstrated a similar long TCSS period between patients without pCLND and the control group. The 10-year TCSS of patients without pCLND was 99.47%, which is similar to the results of previous studies [28, 29]. Interestingly, in our study, we demonstrated poor OS in patients without pCLND, which was not reported in previous studies. Several mechanisms may explain the poor OS in patients without pCLND. One possible explanation is that pCLND may be a potential protective factor for OS because patients without pCLND have a higher risk of developing recurrence and metastasis [10]. Patients may also die from complications secondary to recurrence or metastasis, which may be recorded as death for other reasons. However, a more reasonable explanation is that this survival disparity was caused by baseline comorbidities with the diagnosis of PTC. Comorbidities can increase the risk of non-thyroid cancer mortality [30]. Patients with comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease and other malignancies, would be less likely to undergo pCLND if there were no clinically positive lymph nodes. Actually, in our clinical work, we tend to perform less extensive surgery on patients with comorbidities, such as heart disease or cancer. In this study, patients with pCLND were much older than the control group (mean age: 50.02 vs. 46.98), which meant that patients without pCLND had a higher probability of having comorbidities. However, as baseline comorbidities were not recorded in the SEER database, we could not conduct a further analysis. However, in this study, more patients without pCLND died from other causes, such as cardiovascular disease and other cancers, rather than thyroid cancer. Studies have also reported that patients with comorbidities were more likely to undergo less extensive surgery [31-33]. However, most of the present studies focused on recurrence-free survival or TCSS. Few studies have reported OS disparities between patients with and without pCLND. Further studies are needed to clarify the association between pCLND and the OS of PTC. The notable strengths of this study include the large patient cohort and long-term active follow-up of survival. However, there were also several limitations that need to be noted. First, SEER provides no information about thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy. The potential adverse consequences of TSH suppression may develop and cause increased cardiovascular risks [34]. Second, there was a variety of information that was not routinely collected in the SEER, such as body mass index and medical comorbidities. Comorbidities are known to increase the risk for non-cancer mortality that could affect the pCLND-associated survival disparities. Finally, SEER only included whether lymph node dissection was performed, but information about pCLND was not recorded. Therefore, we could not make a direct comparison between patients with pCLND and patients without pCLND. Instead, those patients with N0 PTC who underwent CLND were chosen as the control group.

Conclusions

In conclusion, in this large population-based analysis, patients without pCLND had excellent long-term TCSS. Patients without pCLND had similar TCSS compared with the control group after adjusting for confounders but had significantly poorer OS. Whether the OS disparities were attributed to pCLND or other factors still needs further study.
  34 in total

1.  In papillary thyroid cancer, preoperative central neck ultrasound detects only macroscopic surgical disease, but negative findings predict excellent long-term regional control and survival.

Authors:  Mauricio A Moreno; Beth S Edeiken-Monroe; Eric R Siegel; Steven I Sherman; Gary L Clayman
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 2.  The pros and cons of prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Ernest L Mazzaferri; Gerard M Doherty; David L Steward
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 3.  Thyroid surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer - recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Tracy S Wang; Julie Ann Sosa
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 4.  Benefits of thyrotropin suppression versus the risks of adverse effects in differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Bernadette Biondi; David S Cooper
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  Observation of clinically negative central compartment lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Iain J Nixon; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Luc G Morris; Frank L Palmer; Dorothy Thomas; R Michael Tuttle; Jatin P Shah; Ashok R Shaha
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Association of Lymph Node Density With Survival of Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Moran Amit; Samantha Tam; Mongkol Boonsripitayanon; Maria E Cabanillas; Naifa L Busaidy; Elizabeth Gardner Grubbs; Stephen Y Lai; Neil D Gross; Erich M Sturgis; Mark E Zafereo
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 6.223

7.  Life Expectancy and Treatment Patterns in Elderly Patients With Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Shivangi Lohia; Piyush Gupta; Michael Curry; Luc G T Morris; Benjamin R Roman
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jingxin Mao; Qinghai Zhang; Haiyan Zhang; Ke Zheng; Rui Wang; Guoze Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Long-term outcomes of patients with papillary thyroid cancer who did not undergo prophylactic central neck dissection.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Ligang Wu; Wensheng Liu; Jie Liu; Yang Liu; Zhengang Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.805

Review 10.  The Role of Central Neck Lymph Node Dissection in the Management of Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence A Shirley; Natalie B Jones; John E Phay
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.