Riaz Agha1, Ali Abdall-Razak2, Eleanor Crossley3, Naeem Dowlut4, Christos Iosifidis5, Ginimol Mathew6. 1. Bart's Health NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 2. Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: Ali.abdall-razak@outlook.com. 3. Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK. 4. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. 5. Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. 6. UCL Medical School, London, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The STROCSS guideline was developed in 2017 to improve the reporting quality of observational studies in surgery. Building on its impact and usefulness, we sought to update the guidelines two years after its publication. METHODS: A steering group was formed to review the existing guideline and propose amendments to the 17-item checklist. A Delphi consensus exercise was utilised to determine agreement across a list of proposed modifications to the STROCSS 2017 guideline. An expert panel of 46 surgeons were invited to assess the proposed updates via Google Forms. RESULTS: The response rate was 91% (n = 42/46). High agreement was reached across all the items and the guideline was finalised in the first round. The checklist maintained 17-items, with modifications primarily considered to improve content and readability. CONCLUSIONS: The STROCSS 2019 guideline is hereby presented as a considered update to improve reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.
INTRODUCTION: The STROCSS guideline was developed in 2017 to improve the reporting quality of observational studies in surgery. Building on its impact and usefulness, we sought to update the guidelines two years after its publication. METHODS: A steering group was formed to review the existing guideline and propose amendments to the 17-item checklist. A Delphi consensus exercise was utilised to determine agreement across a list of proposed modifications to the STROCSS 2017 guideline. An expert panel of 46 surgeons were invited to assess the proposed updates via Google Forms. RESULTS: The response rate was 91% (n = 42/46). High agreement was reached across all the items and the guideline was finalised in the first round. The checklist maintained 17-items, with modifications primarily considered to improve content and readability. CONCLUSIONS: The STROCSS 2019 guideline is hereby presented as a considered update to improve reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.
Authors: Joaquin M Munoz-Rodriguez; Javier Lopez-Monclus; Marina Perez-Flecha; Alvaro Robin-Valle de Lersundi; Luis A Blazquez-Hernando; Ana Royuela-Vicente; Juan P Garcia-Hernandez; Aritz Equisoain-Azcona; Manuel Medina-Pedrique; Miguel A Garcia-Urena Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Soha Nafez Al-Beitawi; Tariq N Al-Shatanawi; Suhair Adel Qudsieh; Ehab Ibrahim Abu Marar; Mazhar Salim Al Zoubi; Mohammad Al-Zubi Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2021-05-12