| Literature DB >> 35837224 |
Bingqin Su1, Yuting Lin2, Jian Wang1, Xiaohui Quan1, Zhankun Chang1, Chuangxue Rui3.
Abstract
Object detection is to identify objects and then find some objects of interest. With the development of computers, target detection has evolved from traditional detection methods to artificial intelligence methods, and the latter are mainly based on some algorithms of deep learning. This paper mainly tests the treated sewage. First, the neural network and convolutional neural network algorithms in deep learning are studied, and then a target detection system is built based on these two algorithms. Finally, the treated sewage is detected and then compared with that of the traditional target detection system. The experimental results show that the target detection system of the convolutional neural network algorithm has a very stable recognition rate for the treated sewage, swinging around 70%, and the amplitude is not large. However, the target detection system of the neural network algorithm is not very stable in the recognition rate of the treated sewage, and the recognition rate is about 60%.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35837224 PMCID: PMC9276506 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2743781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1A neuron model.
Figure 2Activation function image.
Figure 3Degree of fit.
Figure 4Convolutional neural network architecture.
Figure 5Convolutional layer structure.
Figure 6Pooling layer.
Figure 7Traditional object detection process.
Figure 8Target detection process based on deep learning.
Figure 9Sewage treatment process.
Detection data of target detection system based on convolutional neural network algorithm.
| 2–6 | 6–10 | 10–14 | 14–18 | 18–22 | 22–2 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First day | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 41 |
| Second day | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 42 |
| Third day | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 42 |
| Fourth day | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 44 |
| Total | 28 | 30 | 27 | 30 | 28 | 28 | 169 |
Detection data of target detection system based on neural network algorithm.
| 2–6 | 6–10 | 10–14 | 14–18 | 18–22 | 22–2 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First day | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 36 |
| Second day | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 33 |
| Third day | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 36 |
| Fourth day | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 39 |
| Total | 24 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 23 | 24 | 144 |
Detection data based on traditional object detection system.
| 2–6 | 6–10 | 10–14 | 14–18 | 18–22 | 22–2 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First day | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 19 |
| Second day | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| Third day | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| Fourth day | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 18 |
| Total | 11 | 13 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 71 |
Figure 10Data comparison diagram of three target detection systems.
Figure 11Comparison of two deep learning algorithms for recognition.
Figure 12Comparison of convolutional neural networks and traditional algorithms for recognition.