Literature DB >> 35836851

PKC inhibitors regulate stem cell self-renewal by regulating H3K27me3 and H3K9me3.

Jialei Sun1, Na He2, Weiguo Wang1, Yujian Dai1, Chunhui Hou3, Fuliang Du1.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem cell (ESC) research is critical to the scientific community, as their application in regenerative medicine can be widely beneficial. ESCs eventually withdraw from their self-renewal program and subsequently differentiate into specific cell lineages; however, the mechanisms regulating these processes remain unclear. PKC inhibition using 3-[1-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]-5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl]-4-(1H-indol-3-yl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (PKCi) is responsible for the derivation and maintenance of human, rat, and mouse ESCs, but the mechanism by which PKCi maintains stem cell self-renewal is poorly understood. By studying the PKCi stem cell (PKCi-mESC) transcriptome and epigenetic modification, we found the transcriptome of PKCi-mESC differed from 2i stem cells (2i-mESC), with 2010 up-regulated genes and 1784 down-regulated genes. Among them, genes related to core transcription factors, naïve-specific markers, and pluripotency are differentially expressed between the two stem cell lines. We analyzed epigenetic modification of PKCi-mESC and found the distribution of H3K27me3 signal was significantly reduced at transcription start sites (TSSs) throughout the genome and at differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Likewise, the H3K9me3 signal at TSSs throughout the genome was significantly reduced in PKCi-mESC, but the distribution on DEGs is reversed. Kdm4d and Kdm6a knockdown by RNA interference (RNAi) significantly altered the expression of genes related to self-renewal in PKCi-mESC. In conclusion, we revealed PKCi-mESC and 2i-mESC differentially express numerous genes, including stem cell-related genes. Furthermore, PKCi-mESC regulated gene expression through H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 modification, which maintained stem cell self-renewal capacity. AJTR
Copyright © 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mouse; PKCi; histone modification; mESC; self-renewal

Year:  2022        PMID: 35836851      PMCID: PMC9274548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   3.940


  49 in total

Review 1.  Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation.

Authors:  Mona D Shahbazian; Michael Grunstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Naive and primed pluripotent states.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  Epigenetic control of embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Lyle Armstrong
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs.

Authors:  Jiekai Chen; He Liu; Jing Liu; Jing Qi; Bei Wei; Jiaqi Yang; Hanquan Liang; You Chen; Jing Chen; Yaran Wu; Lin Guo; Jieying Zhu; Xiangjie Zhao; Tianran Peng; Yixin Zhang; Shen Chen; Xuejia Li; Dongwei Li; Tao Wang; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Somatic Reprograming by Nuclear Transfer.

Authors:  Vincent Brochard; Nathalie Beaujean
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  Dynamic reprogramming of histone acetylation and methylation in the first cell cycle of cloned mouse embryos.

Authors:  Fengchao Wang; Zhaohui Kou; Yu Zhang; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 7.  The NuRD architecture.

Authors:  Hillary F Allen; Paul A Wade; Tatiana G Kutateladze
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3.

Authors:  Qi Long Ying; Jennifer Nichols; Ian Chambers; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity.

Authors:  Todd S Macfarlan; Wesley D Gifford; Shawn Driscoll; Karen Lettieri; Helen M Rowe; Dario Bonanomi; Amy Firth; Oded Singer; Didier Trono; Samuel L Pfaff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Epigenetic differences between naïve and primed pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Saori Takahashi; Shin Kobayashi; Ichiro Hiratani
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.