Literature DB >> 35834318

Evaluation of denoising digital breast tomosynthesis data in both projection and image domains and a study of noise model on digital breast tomosynthesis image domain.

Daniele Cristina Scarparo1, Denis Henrique Pinheiro Salvadeo1,2, Daniel Carlos Guimarães Pedronette1, Bruno Barufaldi2, Andrew Douglas Arnold Maidment2.   

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an imaging technique created to visualize 3-D mammary structures for the purpose of diagnosing breast cancer. This imaging technique is based on the principle of computed tomography. Due to the use of a dangerous ionizing radiation, the "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) principle should be respected, aiming at minimizing the radiation dose to obtain an adequate examination. Thus, a noise filtering method is a fundamental step to achieve the ALARA principle, as the noise level of the image increases as the radiation dose is reduced, making it difficult to analyze the image. In our work, a double denoising approach for DBT is proposed, filtering in both projection (prereconstruction) and image (postreconstruction) domains. First, in the prefiltering step, methods were used for filtering the Poisson noise. To reconstruct the DBT projections, we used the filtered backprojection algorithm. Then, in the postfiltering step, methods were used for filtering Gaussian noise. Experiments were performed on simulated data generated by open virtual clinical trials (OpenVCT) software and on a physical phantom, using several combinations of methods in each domain. Our results showed that double filtering (i.e., in both domains) is not superior to filtering in projection domain only. By investigating the possible reason to explain these results, it was found that the noise model in DBT image domain could be better modeled by a Burr distribution than a Gaussian distribution. Finally, this important contribution can open a research direction in the DBT denoising problem.
© 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burr distribution; Gaussian noise; Poisson noise; digital breast tomosynthesis; double denoising; noise model

Year:  2019        PMID: 35834318      PMCID: PMC6381383          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.3.031410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  5 in total

1.  Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering.

Authors:  Kostadin Dabov; Alessandro Foi; Vladimir Katkovnik; Karen Egiazarian
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Single-image noise level estimation for blind denoising.

Authors:  Xinhao Liu; Masayuki Tanaka; Masatoshi Okutomi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise.

Authors:  D T Kuan; A A Sawchuk; T C Strand; P Chavel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  An iterative tomosynthesis reconstruction using total variation combined with non-local means filtering.

Authors:  Metin Ertas; Isa Yildirim; Mustafa Kamasak; Aydin Akan
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Realistic Breast Phantom Proposal for 3D Image Reconstruction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Adem Polat; Raziye Kubra Kumrular
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.