Although studies on scaffolds for tissue generation have mainly focused on the chemical composition and pore structure, the effects of scaffold shape have been overlooked. Scaffold shape determines the scaffold surface area (SA) at the single-scaffold level (i.e., microscopic effects), although it also affects the amount of interscaffold space in the tissue defect at the whole-system level (i.e., macroscopic effects). To clarify these microscopic and macroscopic effects, this study reports the osteogenesis abilities of three types of carbonate apatite granular scaffolds with different shapes, namely, irregularly shaped dense granules (DGs) and two types of honeycomb granules (HCGs) with seven hexagonal channels (∼255 μm in length between opposite sides). The HCGs possessed either 12 protuberances (∼75 μm in length) or no protuberances. Protuberances increased the SA of each granule by 3.24 mm2 while also widening interscaffold spaces and increasing the space percentage in the defect by ∼7.6%. Interscaffold spaces were lower in DGs than HCGs. On DGs, new bone formed only on the surface, whereas on HCGs, bone simultaneously formed on the surface and in intrascaffold channels. Interestingly, HCGs without protuberances formed approximately 30% more new bone than those with protuberances. Thus, even tiny protuberances on the scaffold surface can affect the percentage of interscaffold space, thereby exerting dominant effects on osteogenesis. Our findings demonstrate that bone regeneration can be improved by considering macroscopic shape effects beyond the microscopic effects of the scaffold.
Although studies on scaffolds for tissue generation have mainly focused on the chemical composition and pore structure, the effects of scaffold shape have been overlooked. Scaffold shape determines the scaffold surface area (SA) at the single-scaffold level (i.e., microscopic effects), although it also affects the amount of interscaffold space in the tissue defect at the whole-system level (i.e., macroscopic effects). To clarify these microscopic and macroscopic effects, this study reports the osteogenesis abilities of three types of carbonate apatite granular scaffolds with different shapes, namely, irregularly shaped dense granules (DGs) and two types of honeycomb granules (HCGs) with seven hexagonal channels (∼255 μm in length between opposite sides). The HCGs possessed either 12 protuberances (∼75 μm in length) or no protuberances. Protuberances increased the SA of each granule by 3.24 mm2 while also widening interscaffold spaces and increasing the space percentage in the defect by ∼7.6%. Interscaffold spaces were lower in DGs than HCGs. On DGs, new bone formed only on the surface, whereas on HCGs, bone simultaneously formed on the surface and in intrascaffold channels. Interestingly, HCGs without protuberances formed approximately 30% more new bone than those with protuberances. Thus, even tiny protuberances on the scaffold surface can affect the percentage of interscaffold space, thereby exerting dominant effects on osteogenesis. Our findings demonstrate that bone regeneration can be improved by considering macroscopic shape effects beyond the microscopic effects of the scaffold.
As the global population is
aging rapidly, healthy life expectancy should accompany this increase.[1,2] To extend the healthy life expectancy, the maintenance and recovery
of oral and locomotory functions are crucial, for which dental implantation
and orthopedic bone regeneration are effective.[1−4] Bone augmentation is often needed
for dental implants when the alveolar bone is resorbed.[4−6] To address this issue, granular scaffolds, rather than blockish
scaffolds, are often used for bone regeneration,[4−6] and they have
been frequently used for the regeneration of intrabony defects formed
by trauma and tumorectomy in orthopedic surgery.[2] Although autologous bone grafting is currently the gold
standard in bone regeneration, it can severely damage the donor site,
thus providing a limited amount of harvested bone and delaying surgery.[4−11] To counteract these drawbacks, synthetic scaffolds for bone regeneration
should be developed.The chemical composition of synthetic scaffolds
for bone regeneration
usually includes hydroxyapatite (HAp) and β-tricalcium phosphate
(TCP).[12−16] However, HAp is not well resorbed and remains in the body.[17] Conversely, β-TCP resorption is excessively
fast, and its function as a scaffold declines before a sufficient
bone volume is reached.[18] However, the
resorption of carbonate apatite (CAp), known as a bone mineral analog,
synchronizes with bone formation, and it is eventually replaced by
new bone.[19−23]Nevertheless, the chemical composition of scaffolds is only
one
factor affecting bone regeneration. The porosity of scaffolds is also
a dominant influencing factor.[24−27] Introducing channels (>100 μm in apertural
size) into scaffolds is an effective approach to facilitate the penetration
of tissues and cells into the scaffold, thereby promoting bone regeneration.[24−30] Granular scaffolds with macropores (>100 μm in diameter)
rather
than channels can be fabricated using various methods.[31−38] However, the macropores introduced into granular scaffolds by conventional
approaches, such as sacrificial template and gas forming methods,[39−43] show poor interconnectivity and irregular size and shape. In addition,
not all granular scaffolds develop macropores. Although three-dimensional
(3D) printing has the potential to solve these issues, it is currently
unsuitable for the fabrication of granular porous scaffolds because
of its low resolution and productivity.[26,44,45] Therefore, a method of fabricating granular scaffolds
with precisely controlled porous structures should be developed.Spaces are created when bone defects are filled with granular scaffolds,
and these interscaffold spaces serve as paths for the penetration
of cells and tissues. However, increases in such spaces lead to a
decrease in the percentage of scaffold regions in the bone defect.
Therefore, interscaffold spaces and channels should be controlled
to achieve effective bone regeneration. The characteristics of interscaffold
spaces are dominated by the granular shape. Therefore, to clarify
the effects of interscaffold spaces, the precise fabrication of granular
scaffolds is essential.Furthermore, the shape of granular scaffolds
also determines the
surface area (SA) of each granular scaffold. As described above, the
shape of granular scaffolds often affects interscaffold spaces by
altering the occupancy rate of scaffolds in the bone defect. Thus,
the effect of granular scaffold shape may extend beyond the single-scaffold
scale (i.e., microscopic scale) to affect the whole system (i.e.,
macroscopic scale). Nevertheless, these macroscopic and microscopic
effects of granular scaffold shape are still not understood.Extrusion molding is a suitable method for fabricating materials
with precisely controlled porous structure and shape. We have previously
fabricated CAp honeycomb scaffolds by exploiting extrusion molding.[19,20,30,46−54] The precisely controlled porous structure promoted bone regeneration.
Notably, intrascaffold channels of 230–300 μm in apertural
size can prevent the penetration of fibrous tissues into the scaffold,
thus providing a dominant position for osteogenesis and angiogenesis.[30,47−49] Furthermore, among triangle-, square-, and hexagon-shaped
cell geometries, the hexagonal cell has the largest area when the
outer periphery lengths of these cells are equal;[55,56] moreover, extraneous loads applied to a plane can be distributed
onto the other five planes.[57] Thus, a honeycomb
structure consisting of hexagonal cells is superior in both porosity
and mechanical strength. In terms of cell responses, hexagonal channels
surpass triangular and square channels in terms of tissue amplification
on channel faces. Therefore, honeycomb scaffolds are useful for clarifying
the effects of scaffold shape and achieving effective bone regeneration.This study presents the effects of scaffold shape on bone regeneration
for three types of granular scaffolds with different shapes. Based
on our previous findings, we used extrusion molding to fabricate two
types of granular honeycomb scaffolds [honeycomb granules (HCGs)]
with optimally sized intrascaffold channels. The HCG shapes were set
by creating protuberances onto the surface while maintaining the basal
honeycomb structure based on the following reasons. We hypothesized
that the protuberances widen the interscaffold space and increase
the SA of each granular scaffold. Therefore, we can demonstrate whether
the interscaffold space or SA of each granular scaffold is the dominant
parameter. Moreover, we sought to determine the influence of tiny
shape differences on bone regeneration at microscopic and macroscopic
scales by evaluations using the HCGs with and without protuberances.
As a control scaffold, we also fabricated irregularly shaped dense
granules (DGs) commonly used in dental treatments. The in
vivo effects of HCG shape on bone regeneration were evaluated
by implanting these three scaffolds into the defects of rabbit femur
condyles. The findings of this study demonstrate the effects of scaffold
shape at microscopic and macroscopic scales, thereby providing insights
into the suitable design of materials for tissue engineering.
Results and Discussion
Fabrication and Characterization of Scaffolds
CAp HCGs
with and without protuberances were manufactured using the following
procedures. First, green honeycomb sticks were prepared by extruding
a mixture of calcium carbonate powder and an organic binder through
a honeycomb die (Figure A). The honeycomb sticks were cut at 1–1.5 mm intervals using
a guillotine cutter (Figure B), which produced green HCGs (Figure C). Subsequently, the organic binder was
removed from the green HCGs by heating at 600 °C for 24 h (Figure D), and calcium carbonate
HCGs were obtained (Figure E). Finally, calcium carbonate HCGs were subject to phosphatization
in a Na2HPO4 solution at 80 °C for 7 d
(Figure F), yielding
CAp HCGs (Figure G).
To evaluate the effects of HCG shape on the responses of in
vivo tissues, HCGs with and without protuberances were manufactured
(Figure H) using different
HC dies corresponding to each shape based on our hypothesis that protuberances
increase both the SA and interscaffold space volume of HCGs. As a
control, irregular-shaped DGs, commonly used as granular scaffolds,
were prepared (Figure H). These granules were implanted into bone defects of rabbit femur
condyles (Figure H).
Figure 1
Schematic
illustration of the manufacture of CAp HCGs and animal
experiments: (A) extrusion process; (B) cutting of green honeycomb
samples; (C) prepared green honeycomb granules (HCGs); (D) heat treatment
of HCGs to obtain CaCO3 HCGs via debinding and sintering;
(E) phosphatization of CaCO3 HCGs by immersion in Na2HPO4 solution; (F) preparation of CAp HCGs; (G)
implantation of CAp HCGs (with or without protuberances) or DGs into
a critical size bone defect in the femur condyle of rabbits.
Schematic
illustration of the manufacture of CAp HCGs and animal
experiments: (A) extrusion process; (B) cutting of green honeycomb
samples; (C) prepared green honeycomb granules (HCGs); (D) heat treatment
of HCGs to obtain CaCO3 HCGs via debinding and sintering;
(E) phosphatization of CaCO3 HCGs by immersion in Na2HPO4 solution; (F) preparation of CAp HCGs; (G)
implantation of CAp HCGs (with or without protuberances) or DGs into
a critical size bone defect in the femur condyle of rabbits.The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of HCGs and
DGs were consistent
with that of CAp (Figure A). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed
phosphate absorption bands at 1136–958 cm–1 and 605–565 cm–1 in the spectra of HCGs,
DGs, and HAp (Figure B).[58,59] The hydroxyl absorption band was observed
in the HAp spectrum (at 628 cm–1) but not in the
spectra of HCGs and DGs.[59] In contrast,
carbonate absorption bands appeared at 1473–1409 cm–1 in the HCG and DG spectra but not in the spectrum of HAp.[58] The XRD and FTIR results revealed that HCGs
and DGs were composed of CAp, indicating that phosphate and hydroxyl
ions in the HAp were substituted by carbonate ions.[58]
Figure 2
(A) XRD patterns and (B) FTIR spectra of HCGs with and without
protuberances and DGs. Commercial CAp and HAp powder were used as
references, respectively.
(A) XRD patterns and (B) FTIR spectra of HCGs with and without
protuberances and DGs. Commercial CAp and HAp powder were used as
references, respectively.The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results
showed that DGs
presented no intrascaffold channels, and their granular size was 1.22
± 0.27 mm (Figure A). Both HCGs, with and without protuberances, presented a honeycomb
structure with seven hexagonal channels in the interior of scaffolds
(Figure B,C). Although
the HCGs showed similar basic shapes, there were differences associated
with the presence or absence of protuberances. The lengths between
the opposite sides of the intrascaffold channels in HCGs with and
without protuberances were 254.1 ± 13.5 μm (Figure B) and 257.1 ± 12.3 μm
(Figure C), respectively.
Moreover, the strut thicknesses of HCGs with and without protuberances
were 137.6 ± 8.8 μm (Figure B) and 137.6 ± 9.5 μm (Figure C), respectively. Therefore,
the sizes of the intrascaffold channels and struts were equal for
HCGs with or without protuberances. In contrast, the granular sizes
of HCGs slightly differed according to the presence or absence of
protuberances. The granular sizes of HCGs with and without protuberances
were 1.30 ± 0.01 mm (Figure B) and 1.13 ± 0.05 mm (Figure C), respectively, which were consistent with
the granular sizes of HCGs (Figure B,C). Because protuberance length a was 75.7 ±
3.2 μm (Figure B), the difference in granular size between HCGs with and without
protuberances was consistent with the total length of two protuberances
facing each other. Moreover, protuberance length b was 101.9 ±
7.5 μm (Figure B). Therefore, one protuberance increased the granular SA by ∼0.27
mm2. Because HCGs with protuberances possessed 12 protuberances
(Figure B), the SA
of an HCG with protuberances was 3.24 mm2 larger than that
of an HCG without protuberances. The HCGs with and without protuberances
and DGs consisted of spherical aggregates of crystals (Figure D–F) and micropores
(<10 μm), between which micropores were observed (Figure G–I). The
macroporosities of scaffolds, that is, the volume percentages of intrascaffold
channels, were estimated by analyzing the μ-CT images of scaffolds
using image analysis software (CT-An, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).
The macroporosities of HCGs with and without protuberances and DGs
were 36.1 ± 0.61, 38.4 ± 0.13, and 0 ± 0%, respectively.
The macroporosity of HCGs with protuberances was lower than that without
protuberances because the volume of HCGs with protuberances was larger
than that of HCGs without protuberances. However, the volume of intrascaffold
channels in the HCGs with protuberances was almost equal to that in
the HCGs without protuberances. Significant differences in macroporosity
were observed between HCGs with and without protuberances (p = 1.6 × 10–3). The macroporosity
of DGs was zero because they possessed no channels. Thus, the macroporosity
of DGs was significantly lower than those of HCGs with and without
protuberances (p = 2.6 × 10–8 and 5.0 × 10–11, respectively).
Figure 3
SEM images
of (A) DGs and (B) HCGs with and (C) without protuberances.
(D–F) High-magnification SEM images of panels A–C. (G–I)
High-magnification SEM images of panels D–F. The characters
“∗” and “#,” white arrows, and
yellow arrowheads indicate intrascaffold channels, struts, protuberances,
and micropores, respectively. Scale bars: 500 μm (A–C),
50 μm (D–F), and 5 μm (G–I).
SEM images
of (A) DGs and (B) HCGs with and (C) without protuberances.
(D–F) High-magnification SEM images of panels A–C. (G–I)
High-magnification SEM images of panels D–F. The characters
“∗” and “#,” white arrows, and
yellow arrowheads indicate intrascaffold channels, struts, protuberances,
and micropores, respectively. Scale bars: 500 μm (A–C),
50 μm (D–F), and 5 μm (G–I).The effects of granular shape on interscaffold
space volume were
evaluated by X-ray microcomputed tomography (CT) of granules filled
into a mold that was the same size as the bone defect investigated
in this study (6 mm in diameter, 5 mm in height). The 3D reconstructed
images show sparsely filled DGs and large interscaffold spaces on
their aggregate surface (Figure A). HCGs (Figure B,C) were more densely filled than DGs (Figure A). Notably, the number of
HCGs without protuberances that filled into the mold (Figure C) was larger than that observed
for HCGs with protuberances (Figure B). Therefore, the interscaffold spaces in the surface
of the aggregates of HCGs without protuberances (Figure C) were smaller than those
in HCGs with protuberances (Figure B). The CT images of the central regions of the granular
aggregates clearly showed the differences in interscaffold spaces
among the three scaffold types (Figure D–F). The HCGs without protuberances (Figure F) were more densely
filled, and their interscaffold spaces were smaller than those of
DGs (Figure D) and
HCGs with protuberances (Figure E). The interscaffold space volumes were calculated
based on a quantitative CT image analysis (Figure G). The volume percentages of interscaffold
spaces in DGs and HCGs with and without protuberances were 40.9 ±
1.6%, 38.4 ± 2.4%, and 30.8 ± 3.0%, respectively (Figure G). The volume percentages
of interscaffold spaces in HCGs without protuberances were significantly
lower than those in DGs (p = 9.2 × 10–5) and HCGs with protuberances (p = 1.2 × 10–3). There was also a significant difference between
DGs and HCGs with protuberances (p = 4.8 × 10–2). The number of scaffolds filled into the mold was
counted as it should correlate with the interscaffold space volume
and the percentage of scaffold region in the mold. The numbers of
DGs and HCGs with and without protuberances per cubic centimeter were
187.7 ± 5.0, 201.2 ± 0.2, and 319.8 ± 6.5, respectively
(Figure H). Therefore,
the number of HCGs without protuberances in the mold was significantly
higher than those of DGs (p = 4.3 × 10–13) and HCGs with protuberances (p = 1.2 × 10–13), and the number of HCGs with protuberances in the
mold was higher than that of DGs (p = 2.9 ×
10–2). In addition, the volumes of intrascaffold
channels, interscaffold spaces (100–360 μm), and micropores
(<10 μm) were measured with mercury intrusion porosimetry
(MIP; Figures I and 4J). Although interscaffold spaces of diameter >360
μm were not detected by MIP because of the adopted measurement
principles, the above CT image analyses compensated for this MIP drawback.
The pore volumes of DGs and HCGs with and without protuberances in
the pore diameter range of >100 μm were 66.6, 293.9, and
251.2
mm3/g, respectively (Figure I,J). Because DGs possessed no intrascaffold channels,
the pores of DGs in the pore diameter range of >100 μm represented
the interscaffold spaces. Furthermore, according to the SEM results,
the intrascaffold channel sizes of HCGs with and without protuberances
were equal (Figure A,B). Therefore, the difference in pore volume in the pore diameter
range above 100 μm between the HCGs corresponded to the difference
between their interscaffold space volumes. Thus, the interscaffold
space volume of HCGs with protuberances was 42.7 mm3/g
larger than that of HCGs without protuberances, in a size range of
100–360 μm.
Figure 4
Three-dimensional reconstructed CT images of
(A) DGs, (B) HCG with
protuberances, and (C) HCGs without protuberances filled in a mold.
The yellow arrow indicates an interscaffold space on the surface of
a granular aggregate. CT images in the center regions of aggregates
of (D) DGs and HCG (E) with and (F) without protuberances filled in
a mold. (G) Volume percentages of interscaffold spaces acquired using
CT image analysis. (H) The number of granules filled in a mold per
square centimeter. Porous structure characteristics measured via mercury
intrusion porosimetry: (I) pore size distribution and (J) cumulative
pore volume versus pore size. Schematic illustration of the correlation
between scaffold shape and (K) interscaffold space volume, (L) region
functioning as cell scaffold in the system, and (M) surface area of
each granular scaffold. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Three-dimensional reconstructed CT images of
(A) DGs, (B) HCG with
protuberances, and (C) HCGs without protuberances filled in a mold.
The yellow arrow indicates an interscaffold space on the surface of
a granular aggregate. CT images in the center regions of aggregates
of (D) DGs and HCG (E) with and (F) without protuberances filled in
a mold. (G) Volume percentages of interscaffold spaces acquired using
CT image analysis. (H) The number of granules filled in a mold per
square centimeter. Porous structure characteristics measured via mercury
intrusion porosimetry: (I) pore size distribution and (J) cumulative
pore volume versus pore size. Schematic illustration of the correlation
between scaffold shape and (K) interscaffold space volume, (L) region
functioning as cell scaffold in the system, and (M) surface area of
each granular scaffold. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.The CT and MIP results (Figure A–J) demonstrated that the order of
interscaffold
space volume was DGs > HCGs with protuberances > HCGs without
protuberances
(Figure K), and the
percentage of region functioning as cell scaffold in the mold was
the opposite (HCGs without protuberances > HCGs with protuberances
> DGs; Figure L).
The order of SA of each granular scaffold was HCGs with protuberances
> HCGs without protuberances > DGs (Figure M). Therefore, although protuberances increased
the SA of each granular scaffold, they also widened the interscaffold
spaces, thereby decreasing the cell scaffold region in the whole system.The concentration of calcium (Figure A) and phosphate (Figure B) ions released from the HCGs and DGs in
a physiological saline solution (pH 7.4) and a weak acid buffer solution
(pH 5.5; resulting from the acids produced by osteoclasts) were measured
by inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrometry
(ICP–AES). For all granules, larger amounts of calcium and
phosphate ions were released at pH 7.4 than at pH 5.5 (Figure A,B). Furthermore, larger amounts
of calcium and phosphate ions were released from HCGs than DGs at
both pH values, regardless of the occurrence of protuberances (Figure A,B). During immersion
for 7 d, the HCGs released a significantly larger amount of calcium
and phosphate ions than DGs at both pH 7.4 and 5.5 (p < 0.05); however, no significant difference between HCGs with
and without protuberances was observed because equal weights of these
HCGs were used for the evaluation. These findings demonstrate that
the degradation of HCGs and DGs was promoted under the weakly acidic
environment produced by osteoclasts, and the intrascaffold channels
of HCGs facilitated their degradation owing to the increase in granular
SA.
Figure 5
(A) Calcium and (B) phosphate ions released from HCGs and DGs in
buffer solutions at pH 7.4 and 5.5. *p < 0.01.
(A) Calcium and (B) phosphate ions released from HCGs and DGs in
buffer solutions at pH 7.4 and 5.5. *p < 0.01.
In Vitro Evaluations
Cell proliferation
in the presence of DGs, HCGs with and without protuberances, and in
the absence of scaffolds (control) was evaluated by assaying the cell
number per square millimeter (Figure A). HCGs promoted cell proliferation, whereas DGs did
not. The cell morphology after 7 d of culture was observed by staining
cellular filamentous actin (F-actin) and nuclei (Figure B). The actin of cells in the
HCG groups developed, whereas that in DG group did not. Furthermore,
in the HCG groups, several cells were angular and dispersed, which
is consistent with the common characteristics of osteogenic cells.[60] Early osteogenic differentiation was evaluated
by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay (Figure C). Cells in the HCG groups showed higher
ALP activities than those in the DG group after 7 and 14 d of culture
(Figure C). Mineralization
was evaluated as a late marker of osteogenic differentiation by alizarin
red S staining after 21 d of culture (Figure D). Mineralized nodules were obvious in the
HCG groups (Figure D). The total mineralized nodule formed in each well was quantified
by measuring the absorbance of alizarin extract.[61] The amounts of mineralized nodules in the HCG groups were
∼30-fold higher than that in DG group (Figure E).
Figure 6
(A) Cell proliferation assays during a culture
period of 7 d. (B)
Fluorescent images after 7 d of culture (scale bar = 100 μm).
Cellular F-actin and nuclei were stained with phalloidin and Hoechst
33258, respectively. (C) ALP activities after 7 and 14 d of culture.
(D) Optical images of cultures stained with Alizarin Red S after 21
d of culture (scale bar = 1 mm). (E) Absorbance of alizarin extracts
for quantification of mineral nodule formation. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01
(A) Cell proliferation assays during a culture
period of 7 d. (B)
Fluorescent images after 7 d of culture (scale bar = 100 μm).
Cellular F-actin and nuclei were stained with phalloidin and Hoechst
33258, respectively. (C) ALP activities after 7 and 14 d of culture.
(D) Optical images of cultures stained with Alizarin Red S after 21
d of culture (scale bar = 1 mm). (E) Absorbance of alizarin extracts
for quantification of mineral nodule formation. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01High concentrations of calcium and phosphate ions
reportedly help
promote cell proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization, whereas
low concentrations of these ions do not induce these effects.[62] Shih et al. reported that osteogenic differentiation
of human mesenchymal stem cells was promoted when ∼0.3 mmol/L
of calcium ions and ∼0.5 mmol/L of phosphate ions were released
from scaffolds.[62] Under physiological conditions
(pH 7.4), HCGs released ∼1.0 mmol/L of calcium ions and ∼0.4
mmol/L of phosphate ions over 3 h and ∼2.0 mmol/L of calcium
ions and ∼0.8 mmol/L of phosphate ions over 3 d (Figure A). Thus, HCGs released effective
levels of calcium and phosphate ions for osteogenic differentiation.
In contrast, the concentrations of calcium and phosphate ions released
from DGs did not reach the effective levels even after 7 d (Figure A). Thus, the intrascaffold
channels of HCGs increased the SA and facilitated their degradation;
consequently, HCGs released effective levels of calcium and phosphate
ions for osteogenic differentiation, while DGs did not. This provides
an explanation for the differences in the cell proliferation, differentiation,
and mineralization of HCGs and DGs.
In Vivo Evaluations
The X-ray μ-CT
showed that radiopaque new bone was formed in the surroundings of
DGs (Figure A) and
HCGs with (Figure B) and without (Figure C) protuberances 4 weeks postimplantation (PI) in rabbit femur defects.
In contrast, in the blank group, little bone was newly formed at 4
weeks after surgery (Figure D). At 12 weeks PI, the border between all scaffolds and new
bone became vague (Figure E–G). In the blank group, although new bone was formed
near the periosteum, massive defects remained within the bone, even
12 weeks after surgery (Figure H). The total volume (TV) of bone defect, material volume
(MV), new bone volume (BV), and trabecular thickness (TbTh) of new
bone was quantified using μ-CT images. The volume percentages
of remaining materials and new bone in the bone defect were indicated
as MV/TV and BV/TV, respectively. The MV/TV at 4 and 12 weeks PI were
59.8 ± 5.3 and 34.2 ± 3.0% for DGs, 30.5 ± 3.3 and
14.3 ± 3.9% for HCGs with protuberances, and 35.7 ± 4.5
and 15.9 ± 3.8% for HCGs without protuberances, respectively
(Figure G). The BV/TV
at 4 and 12 weeks PI were 11.9 ± 3.6 and 17.9 ± 2.2% for
DGs, 23.0 ± 2.4 and 26.1 ± 1.8% for HCGs with protuberances,
and 29.1 ± 2.8 and 31.1 ± 2.3% for HCGs without protuberances,
respectively (Figure H). In contrast, the BV/TV was zero at 4 weeks PI and only 0.5% after
12 weeks after surgery in the blank group (Figure H). These findings demonstrated that a portion
of the scaffolds was gradually replaced by new bone and the bone defect
did not recover without these scaffolds. Furthermore, the TbTh at
4 and 12 weeks PI was 64.0 ± 4.0 and 108.3 ± 4.1 μm
for DGs, 84.9 ± 6.6 and 106.5 ± 9.7 μm for HCGs with
protuberances, and 96.5 ± 7.8 and 105.7 ± 8.8 μm for
HCGs without protuberances, respectively (Figure I). For all of these scaffolds, the TbTh
gradually increased and reached the same level as the original trabeculae
at 12 weeks PI. Notably, the HCGs without protuberances formed a larger
volume of new bone with thicker trabeculae than the HCGs with protuberance
and DGs.
Figure 7
μ-CT images at (A–D) 4 and (E–H) 12 weeks after
surgery. (A,E) DGs and HCGs (B,F) with and (C,G) without protuberances-groups.
(D, H) Blank group (negative control). Yellow arrowheads indicate
granular scaffolds. Quantitative analyses of μ-CT images: (G)
MV/TV, (H) BV/TV, and (I) TbTh. *p < 0.05 and
**p < 0.01. DG- and HCG-implanted groups: n = 6. Blank group: n = 4.
μ-CT images at (A–D) 4 and (E–H) 12 weeks after
surgery. (A,E) DGs and HCGs (B,F) with and (C,G) without protuberances-groups.
(D, H) Blank group (negative control). Yellow arrowheads indicate
granular scaffolds. Quantitative analyses of μ-CT images: (G)
MV/TV, (H) BV/TV, and (I) TbTh. *p < 0.05 and
**p < 0.01. DG- and HCG-implanted groups: n = 6. Blank group: n = 4.The responses of cells and tissues and the resorption
of scaffolds
were analyzed in detail by hematoxylin-eosin (HE), Masson trichrome
(MT), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), osteocalcin (OCN),
and CD31 staining of histological sections. The HE-stained sections
at 4 weeks PI indicated that in the DG-implanted group, new bone was
formed only on the scaffold surface (Figure A), whereas in the HCG-implanted groups,
new bone was formed both on the scaffold surface and the interior
of intrascaffold channels irrespective of the presence of protuberances
(Figure B,C). In the
blank group, bone defects were filled with fibroconnective tissues
(Figure D). High-magnification
images of the DGs-implanted group showed that osteoblasts resided
on the bone formed on the scaffold surface, and blood vessels were
formed in interscaffold spaces (Figure E). In the HCGs-implanted groups, osteoblasts resided
on new bone, and blood vessels were formed in both intrascaffold channels
and interscaffold spaces (Figure F,G). In the blank group, fibroconnective tissues filling
the bone defect were dense (Figure H). In MT-stained sections (Figure I–L), collagen fibers in bones and
mature bones were stained blue and red, respectively.[63] In the DG- and HCG-implanted groups, new bone was mainly
stained blue and partly stained red (Figure I–K). In the blank group, fibroconnective
tissues filling the bone defect were stained blue, indicating that
the tissues were collagenous (Figure L). In the TRAP-stained sections, osteoclasts were
stained brown (Figure M–O). TRAP-positive cells resided on the scaffold surfaces
in the DG- and HCG-implanted groups (Figure M–O), whereas TRAP-positive cells
were not present in the blank group (Figure L). In the OCN-stained sections of the DG-
and HCG-implanted groups, OCN-positive cells, such as osteoblasts,
were stained brown and lined the new bone tissue (Figure Q–S). In contrast, in
the blank group, OCN-positive cells were not observed (Figure T). In the DG- and HCGs-implanted
groups, vascular endothelial cells (VECs) in the CD31-stained sections
were stained brown, and lined blood vessels formed in the interscaffold
spaces and intrascaffold channels (Figure U–W).
Figure 8
Histological sections of the DG- and HCG
implanted groups with
and without protuberances and blank group at 4 weeks after surgery.
(A–H) HE, (G–L) MT, (M–R) TRAP, (M–R)
OCN, and (U–X) CD31-stained sections. Panels E–X showed
magnified images of the regions corresponding to the regions enclosed
by squares in panels A–D. NB, BV, OB, OC, VEC, FCT, and “#”
indicate new bone, blood vessel, osteoblast, osteoclast, vascular
endothelial cell, fibroconnective tissue, and remaining scaffold,
respectively. Scale bars: 500 μm (A–D) and 20 μm
(E–X).
Histological sections of the DG- and HCG
implanted groups with
and without protuberances and blank group at 4 weeks after surgery.
(A–H) HE, (G–L) MT, (M–R) TRAP, (M–R)
OCN, and (U–X) CD31-stained sections. Panels E–X showed
magnified images of the regions corresponding to the regions enclosed
by squares in panels A–D. NB, BV, OB, OC, VEC, FCT, and “#”
indicate new bone, blood vessel, osteoblast, osteoclast, vascular
endothelial cell, fibroconnective tissue, and remaining scaffold,
respectively. Scale bars: 500 μm (A–D) and 20 μm
(E–X).At 12 weeks PI, scaffolds were resorbed in the
DG- and HCG-implanted
groups compared to the results at 4 weeks PI (Figure A–C). In contrast, in the blank group,
the bone defect was filled with adipose tissue (Figure D). High-magnification images of the DG-
and HCG-implanted groups showed that the regions where scaffolds were
resorbed were filled with new bone, that is, the scaffolds were replaced
with new bone (Figures E–G). In contrast, in the blank group, adipose tissues dominated
the bone defect (Figure H). The MT-stained sections in the DGs-implanted group showed a large
portion of blue-stained bone tissue (Figure I). Conversely, in the HCGs-implanted groups,
bone was extensively stained in red (Figure J,K). Therefore, bone tissues in the HCGs-implanted
groups (Figure J,K)
were more mature than those in the DGs-implanted group (Figure I). Furthermore, the bone maturity
in the HCGs-implanted groups increased throughout 4–12 weeks
PI (Figures J,K, and 9J,K), whereas the bone maturity in the DGs-implanted
group did not change substantially (Figures I and 9I). In the
MT-stained sections of the blank group, collagenous tissue disappeared
(Figure L). In the
TRAP-stained sections, the numbers of osteoclasts in the DG- and HCG-implanted
groups dramatically decreased at 4–12 weeks PI (Figure M–O). In the blank group,
TRAP-positive cells were still absent (Figure P). In the OCN-stained sections of the DG-
and HCG-implanted groups, similar to the findings at 4 weeks PI, OCN-positive
cells resided on the new bone surface (Figure Q–S). In the blank group, no OCN-positive
cells were present in the bone defect (Figure T). In the CD31-stained sections, VECs remained
in the interscaffold spaces and intrascaffold channels (Figure U–W). In the blank group,
CD31-positive cells were observed between adipose cells (Figure X).
Figure 9
Histological sections
of the DG- and HCG implanted groups with
and without protuberances and blank group at 12 weeks after surgery.
(A–H) HE, (G–L) MT, (M–R) TRAP, (M–R)
OCN, and (U–X) CD31-stained sections. Panels E–X are
magnified images of the regions corresponding to the regions enclosed
by squares in the panels A–D. NB, BV, OB, OC, VEC, AT, and
“#” indicate new bone, blood vessel, osteoblast, osteoclast,
vascular endothelial cell, adipose tissue, and remaining scaffold,
respectively. Scale bars: 500 μm (A–D) and 20 μm
(E–X).
Histological sections
of the DG- and HCG implanted groups with
and without protuberances and blank group at 12 weeks after surgery.
(A–H) HE, (G–L) MT, (M–R) TRAP, (M–R)
OCN, and (U–X) CD31-stained sections. Panels E–X are
magnified images of the regions corresponding to the regions enclosed
by squares in the panels A–D. NB, BV, OB, OC, VEC, AT, and
“#” indicate new bone, blood vessel, osteoblast, osteoclast,
vascular endothelial cell, adipose tissue, and remaining scaffold,
respectively. Scale bars: 500 μm (A–D) and 20 μm
(E–X).To quantitatively analyze the effects of granular
shape on biological
responses, the area percentages of new bone and remaining materials
and the number of osteoclasts of histological sections were estimated.
Both at 4- and 12-weeks PI, the percentages of new bone area (NBA)
in the HCGs-implanted groups were higher than those in the DGs-implanted
group (Figure A),
demonstrating that the intrascaffold channels contributed to effective
bone ingrowth into the scaffold. The group implanted with HCGs with
protuberances showed a lower NBA percentage than that implanted with
HCGs without protuberances (Figure A). Thus, the presence of protuberances adversely affected
new bone formation. This fundamental reason was because the presence
of the protuberance decreased the number of scaffolds in the bone
defect (Figure H),
which caused a reduction in the total SA of scaffolds in the defect
(Figure L). That is,
the region for the attachment, proliferation, and differentiation
of osteogenesis-related cells was reduced. Owing to the above effects
of intrascaffold channels and protuberances, the HCGs without protuberances
had the highest bone formation rate. In the DG- and HCG-implanted
groups, the NBA percentages increased during the observation period
(Figure A). At 4-
and 12-weeks PI, the percentages of remaining material area (RMA)
in the DGs-implanted group were higher than those in the HCGs-implanted
groups (Figure B),
explained by the DGs’ lack of intrascaffold channels. At 4
weeks PI, the RMA percentage in the group implanted with HCGs without
protuberances was higher than that in the group implanted with HCGs
with protuberances (Figure B). This difference in RMA percentage correlated with the in vitro granule number in the mold (Figure L). In the DG- and HCG-implanted groups,
the RMA percentages decreased between 4- and 12-weeks PI (Figure B), demonstrating
that all scaffolds were gradually resorbed. Furthermore, both at 4-
and 12-weeks PI, the osteoclast numbers in the DGs-implanted group
were smaller than those in the HCGs-implanted groups (Figure C). This occurred because
the DGs did not possess intrascaffold channels (Figure A), and they presented a smaller scaffold
area for osteoclasts than HCGs (Figure L). There was no significant difference between the
osteoclast number per square millimeter of HCGs with and without protuberances
(Figure C). In the
DG- and HCG-implanted groups, the osteoclast numbers decreased from
4 to 12 weeks PI (Figure C). The above in vivo results demonstrate
that all scaffolds were gradually resorbed by osteoclasts and replaced
by new bone. As the replacement of scaffolds by new bone progressed,
the number of osteoclasts decreased. In the blank group, no new bone
formed at 4 weeks after surgery and the NBA percentage was only 0.3%,
even at 12 weeks after surgery (Figure A). Thus, the bone defect was not spontaneously resolved
without the scaffolds.
Figure 10
Percentages of (a) new bone and (b) remaining
materials and (c)
number of osteoclasts on granular scaffolds. *p <
0.05, **p < 0.01. †Significant
difference compared with the results at 4 weeks after surgery. DG-
and HCG-implanted groups: n = 6. Blank group: n = 4.
Percentages of (a) new bone and (b) remaining
materials and (c)
number of osteoclasts on granular scaffolds. *p <
0.05, **p < 0.01. †Significant
difference compared with the results at 4 weeks after surgery. DG-
and HCG-implanted groups: n = 6. Blank group: n = 4.To improve the osteogenesis ability of scaffolds,
previous studies
mainly focused on the effects of raw material composition, substituted
or doped ions, pore characteristics, and incorporation of growth factors,
polysaccharides, stem cells, and extracellular vesicles.[16,64−71] However, the effects of scaffold shape on bone regeneration remained
unclear. To date, the shape of granular scaffolds has not been considered;
granular scaffolds are often manufactured by smashing the bulk material,
producing irregular-shaped granules. Here, we investigated the effects
of granular shapes, which were precisely controlled. The main discovery
was that scaffold shape, even with the presence of tiny protuberances,
profoundly affects the interscaffold space percentage in the bone
defect, ultimately yielding greater effects than the SA of each scaffold.
Thus, the shape difference at the single scaffold scale (i.e., microscopic
scale) affects the cell scaffold area in the whole system (i.e., macroscopic
scale).In the present study, the protuberance length was set
to half the
length of the strut for the initial trial study performed to demonstrate
the effects of small differences in scaffold shape on bone regeneration.
When the protuberance is longer, steric hindrance may be greater,
which may widen the interscaffold space and decrease the number of
scaffolds in the bone defect. As a result, new bone formation may
decrease. In contrast, when the protuberance is shorter, the effect
of the SA of each scaffold might surpass that of the scaffold number
in the bone defect, resulting in a higher rate of new bone formation.
The scaffold shape in this study is not optimal for every bone defect
because the ideal shape depends on the shape and size of the bone
defect. Nevertheless, the findings in this study are universally applicable
because scaffold shape should be designed by considering macroscopic
scale effects wielded by microscopic differences. Thus, the bone regeneration
ability of scaffolds can be further enhanced by considering scaffold
shape as a key parameter in scaffold design. The incorporation of
computational science may help design scaffold shapes depending on
the characteristics of the tissue defect.
Conclusions
In this study, we fabricated HCGs with
and without protuberances
and DGs. The presence of protuberances decreased the cell scaffold
region of HCGs in the system but increased the SA of each HCG. The
total SA of DGs in the system and the SA of each DG were lower than
those of HCGs because of their irregular shape and absence of intrascaffold
channels, respectively. Owing to the intrascaffold channels, HCGs
formed larger amounts of new bone than DGs. In addition, HCGs without
protuberances formed larger amounts of new bone than HCGs with protuberances.
Therefore, the number of cell scaffolds in the whole system (macroscopic
effects of scaffold shape) was the driving factor for bone regeneration
rather than the SA of each granular scaffold (i.e., microscopic effects
of scaffold shape).
Methods
Fabrication of Granular Scaffolds
HCGs were fabricated
using a method modified from our previous report,[49] as illustrated in Figure . First, honeycomb green sticks were manufactured by
extrusion molding using CaCO3 powder (Sakai Chemical Industry,
Osaka, Japan) and an acryl resin-based binder (Nagamine Manufacturing,
Kagawa, Japan) in an extruder (Lab Plastmill, Toyo Seiki Seisaku-sho
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The green honeycomb sticks were extruded on a
conveyor belt (Figure A) and then cut with a guillotine cutter into 1–1.5 mm-long
granules (Figure B)
to produce green HCGs (Figure C). Subsequently, green HCGs were heated at 600 °C for
24 h (Figure D) to
remove the organic binder, yielding CaCO3 HCGs (Figure E). Finally, to convert
the chemical composition of HCGs from CaCO3 to CAp through
dissolution–precipitation reactions, CaCO3 HCGs
were immersed in a 1 mol/L Na2HPO4 solution
(Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) and phosphatized at 80
°C for 7 d (Figure F). The obtained CAp HCGs (Figure G) were washed thoroughly with distilled water.
Physicochemical Properties
The crystal phases of HCGs
and DGs were determined using XRD (D8 Advance, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe,
Germany). Functional groups in the HCGs and DGs were determined using
FTIR spectrophotometry (FT-IR-6200, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). Commercial
CAp granules (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and HAp powder (Taihei
Chemical Industrial, Osaka, Japan) were used as references. Microstructures
and shapes of HCGs and DGs were observed by SEM (S3400N, Hitachi High-Technologies,
Tokyo, Japan). The porous characteristics of HCGs and DGs were measured
by MIP (AutoPore 9420, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The macroporosities
of the HCGs and DGs were calculated from the following equation (n = 20):Intrascaffold channel volume and scaffold
volume were quantified using quantitative 3D analysis software for
CT images (CT-An, Bruker Corporation). To estimate these volumes,
the whole scaffold was set as the region of interest (ROI). The channels
and struts were easily distinguished (Figure S1) and used to calculate the macroporosity.
Percentage and Volume of Interscaffold Space and Granular Number
The percentage and volume of interscaffold space were analyzed
by an X-ray μ-CT (SkyScan, Bruker Corporation) analysis of granular
scaffolds filled into a cylindrical Styrofoam mold (6 mm in diameter
and 5 mm in height). CT analyses were conducted using quantitative
3D analysis software for CT images (CT-An, Bruker Corporation). To
determine the granular scaffold number per cubic centimeter, the granular
scaffolds were filled into the mold, and they were taken out from
the mold. The number of scaffolds taken was counted. These counting
procedures were repeated five times, and the average and standard
deviation were calculated.
Release of Ions from Granular Scaffolds into Buffer Solutions
HCGs and DGs (50 mg) were immersed in a 0.05 mol/L tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane–HCl
buffer solution (20 mL) at pH 7.4 (corresponding to physiological
pH) and 0.08 mol/L acetic acid–sodium acetate solution (20
mL) at pH 5.5 (corresponding to a weakly acidic environment because
of osteoclast-produced acids). After immersion for 3 h, 1 d , 3 d,
and 7 d, supernatant samples were collected. The concentrations of
calcium and phosphate ions released from the HCGs and DGs in the supernatants
were measured by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission
spectrometry (ICP–OES, Optima 7300 DV, PerkinElmer, MA, USA).
In Vitro Cell Proliferation, ALP Activity,
and Mineralization Assays
Human umbilical cord mesenchymal
stem cells (JCRB Cell Bank, Osaka, Japan) were used to evaluate cell
proliferation, ALP activity, and mineralization in the presence of
HCGs and DGs. Cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at 1.0 × 105 cells/well and cultured in a medium (Plusoid-M, GlycoTechnica,
Kanagawa, Japan) for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere
containing 5% CO2. Subsequently, HCGs or DGs filled in
cell culture inserts containing a 0.4-μm transparent polyethylene
terephthalate membrane (Corning, NY, USA) were set at each well. After
6, 24, 48 h, and 7 d of culture, the cell number per well (n = 6) was assayed using a water-soluble tetrazolium (WST)
salt (WST-8 assay kit, DOJINDO, Kumamoto, Japan). The cell proliferation
was evaluated by comparing the cell number per well cultured without
materials, that is, the control group.For cytoskeleton observations,
after 7 d of culture, cells were fixed with a formalin solution (FUJIFILM
Wako Pure Chemical) for 30 min. The fixed cells were permeabilized
with 1% polyethylene glycol mono-4-octylphenyl ether (Triton X-100,
Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) for 5 min at room temperature.
Then, the F-actin cytoskeleton and nucleus were stained with fluorescent-labeled
phalloidin (Acti-stain 555 phalloidin, Cytoskeleton, Inc., CO, USA)
and Hoechst 33258 (DOJINDO). The stained cells were observed using
a fluorescent microscope (BZ-X, Keyence, Osaka, Japan).ALP
activities were evaluated after 7 and 14 d of culture by the
following procedures. Cells were washed three times with sterile PBS
and lysed with 1% Triton X-100 (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) for 30 min.
The ALP activity and the total protein concentrations of the cells
were measured according to the instructions of the ALP assay kit (LabAssay
ALP, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical) and protein assay kit (Protein Assay
Rapid Kit wako II, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical), respectively. The
absorbance at wavelengths of 405 and 600 nm corresponding to the ALP
activity and total protein concentration, respectively, were measured
using a microplate reader (Multiskan FC, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA).Mineralization was evaluated after 21 d of culture by the following
procedures. Cells were fixed with a formalin solution (FUJIFILM Wako
Pure Chemical) and stained with an Alizarin Red S staining kit (Cosmo
Bio, Tokyo, Japan). The cells were washed six times with distilled
water, and optical images were taken with a microscope (BZ-X, Keyence).
The total mineralized nodules formed in each well were quantified
according to the method of Lee et al.[61] Alizarin Red S was extracted from the stained sites by adding 10%
(w/v) cetylpyridinium chloride (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan)
buffer in 10 mM Na2HPO4 (FUJIFILM Wako Pure
Chemical) and maintaining the samples overnight at 37 °C. Then,
200 μL aliquots were transferred to a 96-well plate, and the
absorbance at 560 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Multiskan
FC). The absorbance difference between the sample and blank groups
was also calculated.
Ethics Statement
All animal experiments were conducted
according to the ethical policies and procedures approved by the Animal
Care and Use Committee of Kyushu University, Japan (Approval No. A30-237-0;
issued August 1, 2018).
Animals
Japanese white rabbits (18 weeks of age, 3.0–3.5
kg of body weight) were purchased from Japan SLC (Shizuoka, Japan).
Rabbits were single-housed in cages and maintained on a standard diet
with an adequate amount of water at the Center of Biomedical Research,
Research Center for Human Disease Modeling, Graduate School of Medical
Sciences, Kyushu University. Eighteen rabbits (36 legs) were used
for the HCG and DG groups (n = 6 per group), and
four rabbits were used for the negative control group (n = 4). A total of twenty-two rabbits were used.
Surgical Procedure
To prepare a critical-size bone
defect, which is a wound that will not heal spontaneously despite
surgical stabilization and requires further surgical intervention,
a sufficiently large rabbit femur condyle was used to prepare the
critical-size bone defects.[72] Rabbits were
subjected to an intramuscular anesthesia injection of xylazine (5.0
mg/kg) and ketamine (30 mg/kg). The femur area of the rabbits was
shaved on both sides. The femoral skin was disinfected with 10% w/v
povidone–iodine (Meiji Seika Pharma, Tokyo, Japan). The femur
condyle was exposed by making an incision in the femoral skin (approximately
2 cm in length) using a scalpel. The periosteum was separated from
the bone using a raspatory. HCGs and DGs were separately implanted
into the critical size defects (6 mm diameter, 3 mm depth) produced
in the femur condyles of both legs. The periosteum and subsequently
the incised skin were sutured. Finally, the surgical site was disinfected
with 10% w/v povidone–iodine and, subsequently, a gentamicin
sulfate solution (Gentacin, Takata Pharmaceutical, Saitama, Japan)
was intraperitoneally injected to prevent infection.
Radiographic and Histological Analyses
Four and 12
weeks after the implantation of HCGs and DGs, rabbit femurs (n = 6 per group) were collected and immersed in a formalin
solution to fix them. The μ-CT images of the scaffolds-implanted
regions were obtained by μ-CT scanning (SkyScan, Bruker Corporation).
For the μ-CT analyses, the whole bone defect area was set as
the ROI. An example ROI set in a slice image is shown in Figure S2A in the Supporting Information. ROIs
were similarly set in all images. The bone ROI was clearly extracted
(Figure S2B). Similarly, the material ROI
was easily extracted. The BV and MV relative to the TV of the bone
defect and the TbTh were quantified using quantitative 3D analysis
software for CT images (CT-An, Bruker Corporation). The volume percentages
of new bone and remaining scaffold in the bone defect were indicated
as BV/TV and MV/TV, respectively.After the μ-CT scanning,
the specimens were decalcified, paraffin-embedded, and sliced into
sections, which were treated with HE, TRAP, OCN, CD31, and MT staining.
The histological images of the HE-, MT-, OCN-, CD31-, and TRAP-stained
tissue sections were obtained using a microscope (BZ-X, Keyence).
The share of new bone and remaining material areas and the number
of osteoclasts were estimated using the BZ-X digital analysis software
for the stained sections.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted
using KaleidaGraph version 4.5 (Synergy Software, PA, USA). All data
are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Differences
were determined based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and
for significant differences, the post hoc Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison
Test was conducted.
Authors: Anwarul Hasan; Batzaya Byambaa; Mahboob Morshed; Mohammad Ibrahim Cheikh; Rana Abdul Shakoor; Tanvir Mustafy; Hany E Marei Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Philippe Rosset; Florian Gebhard; Philippe Hernigou; Nicola Baldini; Helène Rouard; Luc Sensebé; Rosa M Gonzalo-Daganzo; Rosaria Giordano; Norma Padilla-Eguiluz; Eduardo García-Rey; José Cordero-Ampuero; Juan Carlos Rubio-Suárez; Julien Stanovici; Christian Ehrnthaller; Markus Huber-Lang; Charles Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Nathalie Chevallier; Davide Maria Donati; Gabriela Ciapetti; Sandrine Fleury; Manuel-Nicolás Fernandez; José-Rafael Cabrera; Cristina Avendaño-Solá; Tiziana Montemurro; Carmen Panaitescu; Elena Veronesi; Markus Thomas Rojewski; Ramin Lotfi; Massimo Dominici; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Pierre Layrolle Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: A Aloy-Prósper; E Carramolino-Cuéllar; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; D Soto-Peñaloza; M Peñarrocha-Diago Journal: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Date: 2022-03-01
Authors: Dong Joon Lee; Henry C Tseng; Sing Wai Wong; Zhengyan Wang; Meng Deng; Ching-Chang Ko Journal: Bone Res Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 13.567