Literature DB >> 35832956

Primary Dural Repair via an Endoscopic Endonasal Corridor: Preliminary Development of a 3D-Printed Model for Training.

Ivanna Nebor1, Ahmed E Hussein1, Kora Montemagno1, Rebecca Fumagalli1, Ikrame Labiad1, Alice Xu1, Zoe Anderson1, Yash Patil2, Ahmad R Sedaghat2, Jonathan A Forbes1.   

Abstract

Objectives  Endonasal suturing is an investigational method for dural repair that has been reported to decrease the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid fistula. This method requires handling of single-shaft instrumentation in the narrow endonasal corridor. In this study, we designed a low-cost, surgical model using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to simulate dural repair through the endonasal corridor and subsequently assess the utility of the model for surgical training. Methods  Using an Ultimaker 2+ printer, a 3D-printed replica of the cranial base and nasal cavity was fitted with tissue allograft to recapitulate the dural layer. Residents, fellows, and attending surgeons were asked to place two sutures using a 0-degree endoscope and single-shaft needle driver. Task completion time was recorded. Participants were asked to fill out a Likert scale questionnaire after the experiment. Results  Twenty-six participants were separated into groups based on their prior endoscope experience: novice, intermediate, and expert. Twenty-one (95.5%) residents and fellows rated the model as "excellent" or "good" in enhancing their technical skills with endoscopic instrumentation. Three of four (75%) of attendings felt that the model was "excellent" or "good" in usefulness for training in dural suturing. Novice participants required an average of 11 minutes for task completion, as compared with 8.7 minutes for intermediates and 5.7 minutes for experts. Conclusion  The proposed model appears to be highly effective in enhancing the endoscopic skills and recapitulating the task of dural repair. Such a low-cost model may be especially important in enhancing endoscopic facility in countries/regions with limited access to cadaveric specimens. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D model; base; dural suturing; endonasal suturing; skull; surgical; training

Year:  2021        PMID: 35832956      PMCID: PMC9272321          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  19 in total

Review 1.  Extended endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: from the sella to the anterior and posterior cranial fossa.

Authors:  Amanda Oostra; Wouter van Furth; Christos Georgalas
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Surgical outcome in 90 patients with craniopharyngioma: an evaluation of transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Shozo Yamada; Noriaki Fukuhara; Kenichi Oyama; Akira Takeshita; Yasuharu Takeuchi; Junko Ito; Naoko Inoshita
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2010 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  The development of a virtual simulator for training neurosurgeons to perform and perfect endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Gail Rosseau; Julian Bailes; Rolando del Maestro; Anne Cabral; Nusrat Choudhury; Olivier Comas; Patricia Debergue; Gino De Luca; Jordan Hovdebo; Di Jiang; Denis Laroche; Andre Neubauer; Valerie Pazos; Francis Thibault; Robert Diraddo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Development and validation of a 3D-printed model of the ostiomeatal complex and frontal sinus for endoscopic sinus surgery training.

Authors:  Abdulaziz S Alrasheed; Lily H P Nguyen; Luc Mongeau; W Robert J Funnell; Marc A Tewfik
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.858

5.  Clinical experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheet used as an artificial dura mater.

Authors:  S Yamagata; K Goto; Y Oda; H Kikuchi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Fabrication and validation of a low-cost, medium-fidelity silicone injection molded endoscopic sinus surgery simulation model.

Authors:  Daniel R Chang; Ryan P Lin; Sarah Bowe; Leon Bunegin; Erik K Weitzel; Kevin C McMains; Thomas Willson; Philip G Chen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Expanded Endonasal Endoscopic Surgery in Suprasellar Craniopharyngiomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 43 Surgeries Including Recurrent Cases.

Authors:  Ivan Radovanovic; Amir R Dehdashti; Mazda K Turel; Joao Paulo Almeida; Bruno L Godoy; Francesco Doglietto; Allan D Vescan; Gelareh Zadeh; Fred Gentili
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.703

8.  Analysis of Decompressive Craniectomies with Subsequent Cranioplasties in the Presence of Collagen Matrix Dural Substitute and Polytetrafluoroethylene as an Adhesion Preventative Material.

Authors:  Matt Pierson; Paul V Birinyi; Sujit Bhimireddy; Jeroen R Coppens
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Comparison of dural closure alternatives: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ceren Kizmazoglu; Safak Ozyoruk; Resit Bugra Husemoglu; Orhan Kalemci; Gulden Sozer; Burak Sade
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  A new multilayer reconstruction using nasal septal flap combined with fascia graft dural suturing for high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal surgery.

Authors:  Kentaro Horiguchi; Hiroshi Nishioka; Noriaki Fukuhara; Mitsuo Yamaguchi-Okada; Shozo Yamada
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.042

View more
  1 in total

1.  2D versus 3D Endoscopy: Head-to-Head Comparison in a Simulated Model of Endoscopic Endonasal Dural Suturing.

Authors:  Ivanna Nebor; Zoe Anderson; Juan C Mejia-Munne; Ahmed Hussein; Kora Montemagno; Rebecca Fumagalli; Ikrame Labiad; Yash Patil; Norberto Andaluz; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Mario Zuccarello; Jonathan A Forbes
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-11-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.