Literature DB >> 26433096

Analysis of Decompressive Craniectomies with Subsequent Cranioplasties in the Presence of Collagen Matrix Dural Substitute and Polytetrafluoroethylene as an Adhesion Preventative Material.

Matt Pierson1, Paul V Birinyi2, Sujit Bhimireddy2, Jeroen R Coppens2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy is an established treatment for malignant intracranial hypertension. Cranioplasty is performed once cerebral swelling has resolved. Complications include infection, postoperative fluid collections, hematoma, reoperation, and seizures. Our experience using a double layer technique during craniectomy with a collagen matrix onlay dural substitute and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for antiadhesive properties during cranioplasty was reviewed.
METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 39 consecutive patients who underwent craniectomy with placement of collagen matrix dural onlay and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and subsequent cranioplasty. Demographic data, size of craniectomy defect, estimated blood loss, operative time, time between operations, presence of dural tackups, and postoperative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 132 minutes and estimated blood loss was 112 mL. Overall complication rate was 25.6% and no mortality was encountered. Nine patients had postoperative fluid collections measuring ≥ 10 mm in thickness and/or 5 mm of midline shift. Two patients required reoperation for these collections. Two patients developed infections requiring bone flap removal. Three patients developed seizures after cranioplasty. Five patients required shunt placement for hydrocephalus.
CONCLUSIONS: Our dual layer closure technique at time of decompressive craniectomy carries a similar reduction in operative time and estimated blood loss when compared with cranioplasty series with other antiadhesives present. The technique described enables easy dissection of the musculocutaneous flap from the dural plane during cranioplasty and increases the safety of the operation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiadhesion; Craniectomy; Cranioplasty; Dural substitute; Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433096     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Primary Dural Repair via an Endoscopic Endonasal Corridor: Preliminary Development of a 3D-Printed Model for Training.

Authors:  Ivanna Nebor; Ahmed E Hussein; Kora Montemagno; Rebecca Fumagalli; Ikrame Labiad; Alice Xu; Zoe Anderson; Yash Patil; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Jonathan A Forbes
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-03-02

2.  Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Silicone Elastomer Sheet during Decompressive Craniectomy: Anti-Adhesive Role in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Young Ha Kim; Chi Hyung Lee; Chang Hyeun Kim; Dong Wuk Son; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song; Soon Ki Sung
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-18

3.  Endoscopic-assisted Duraplasty with Collagen Matrix for Growing Skull Fracture: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yuki Kozaki; Masani Nonaka; Koichi Miki; Hideaki Tanaka; Hiroshi Abe; Tooru Inoue
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2021-06-10

4.  Delayed Brain Edema and Swelling following Craniectomy for Evacuation of an Epidural Abscess that Improved by Cranioplasty: Case Report.

Authors:  Narushi Sugii; Masahide Matsuda; Tomokazu Sekine; Hideaki Matsumura; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  J Neurol Surg Rep       Date:  2017-08-28

Review 5.  Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Shepetovsky; Gianluca Mezzini; Lorenzo Magrassi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.042

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.