Rikako Ishigamori1, Mie Naruse1, Akihiro Hirata2, Yoshiaki Maru3, Yoshitaka Hippo3, Toshio Imai1,4. 1. Central Animal Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045 Japan. 2. Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Joint Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan. 3. Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, 666-2 Nitonacho, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan. 4. Department of Cancer Model Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045 Japan.
The carcinogenic potential of chemicals was first acknowledged by the US National Cancer
Institute in the late 1960s. In 1978, the National Toxicology Program was established, which
examines chemical-induced carcinogenesis mostly in groups of male and female rats and mice
exposed to a chemical for two years[1]. Since
the 2000s, in addition to long-term studies focusing on continuous administration of test
chemicals, several alternative medium-term models for examining carcinogenicity of chemicals
established using genetically engineered mice (GEM), for example, rasH2 mice, have been
introduced[2], [3], [4], [5]. In
addition, established animal carcinogenesis models treated with certain classes of chemical
carcinogens have been frequently used not only for hazard assessment of chemicals, but also
for preclinical evaluation of potential chemopreventive agents[6], [7].
These test systems using rats and mice remain the cornerstone for the identification of
chemical carcinogens and chemopreventive agents. However, these approaches, particularly
long-term studies, are time-consuming, use a large number of animals, and include the
continuous administration of test chemicals at maximal tolerated doses in
vivo[8], [9]. Therefore, the development of alternative
models in which chemicals are treated in vitro, the duration and number of
animals can be reduced, and histopathology as an end-point of evaluation has been
awaited.A three-dimensional (3D) cell culture system has enabled the maintenance of normal
tissue-derived cells for at least 10–20 weeks in vitro. The organoid
culture system was first reported by Sato et al. using normal intestinal
epithelia in 2009[10], and organoids from
different human/mouse organs and tissues, including the lung[11], liver[12],
and kidney[13], have been introduced to
date. Normal organ/tissue-derived organoids consist of differentiated cells such as
enterocytes, goblet cells, Paneth cells, and enteroendocrine cells of the
intestine[10], and ciliated cells,
goblet cells, and club cells of the lungs[11]. Human organoids are expected to mimic many in vivo
physiological functions of relevant tissues, thus filling the translational gap between
animals and humans. However, the number of toxicity studies using human organoids remains
limited[14]. As an application of normal
murine organ/tissue-derived organoids, we reported sequential cancer-related gene
alterations in intestinal organoids, transduced with lentivirus-based RNAi that mediated
knockdown of tumor suppressor genes or activation of Kras, which evolved in adenocarcinomas
after their injection into nude mouse subcutis[15]. The genetic reconstitution model recapitulated the stepwise
carcinogenesis process through the accumulation of multiple genetic alterations in the
primary murine intestinal cells. Similar phenomena have been induced in human intestinal
cells using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing[16], [17] and
other organ/tissue-derived organoids[18], [19],
[20].We recently reported an organoid-based chemical carcinogenesis model established using
mouse normal tissue-derived organoids[21].
In this report, four genotoxic chemicals (acrylamide [AA], diethylnitrosamine [DEN], ethyl
methanesulfonate [EMS], and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene [DMBA]) were
used to treat normal lung, liver (biliary tract), and/or mammary tissue-derived organoids
with a heterozygous Trp53 knockout background in vitro to
examine their tumorigenicity after injection into nude mice. The four chemicals induced
tumorigenicity or carcinogenic histopathological characteristics with the activation of
oncogenic kinases, consistent with previous reports in corresponding animal studies. More
recently, DMBA-treated mammary organoids developed into tumors after their injection into
nude mouse subcutis were genetically analyzed, and unique changes from a corresponding
in vivo carcinogenesis model were found. This suggests that
organoid-based carcinogenesis models treated with chemicals in vitro can be
applied to detect early genetic events and/or clarify novel modes of action of chemical
carcinogenesis[22]. Although further
validation studies are needed to clarify whether the organoid-based chemical carcinogenesis
model is suitable for screening the carcinogenic potential of genotoxic chemicals, this
system is a potential candidate method for the evaluation of chemicals as it is short-term,
requires a small number of animals, and has a histopathologically-based endpoint of
evaluation.In the present review article, histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of
mouse normal tissue-derived organoids and tumors developed from chemically treated organoids
after their injection into nude mouse subcutis are presented, focusing on the expression of
cytokeratins (CKs), which reflect the origin of epithelia and distribution of extraductal
invasive lesions, in relation to the histopathological features. In addition, the expression
of oncogenic kinases, which are immunohistochemical markers of the early stages of
carcinogenesis that indicate molecular activation in the epithelia after chemical treatment,
was analyzed. This information will improve our biological understanding of organoid-based
chemical carcinogenesis models.
Methods for Organoid Culturing and Exposure of Chemicals
Organoids are generally produced by culturing epithelial cells/crypts dissociated
enzymatically or in the presence of calcium chelators, followed by seeding of the
cells/crypts in laminin-rich Matrigel or other basement membrane extracts to support their
growth[10]. Intestinal organoids grow in
culture media containing epidermal growth factor (EGF) for epithelial proliferation, WNT
agonists for crypt growth, and Noggin for crypt number expansion[10]. Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are required to promote
formation of lung organoids[23]. Organoids
from other organs and tissues may have different culture requirements. Dissociated
epithelial cells or organoids suspended in Matrigel have been reported to be resistant to
lentiviral infection[15] and are considered
to be partly resistant to exposed chemicals. Thus, we established a Matrigel bilayer
organoid culture method (MBOC) to generate appropriate conditions for the exposure of
dissociated epithelial cells to lentivirus and test chemicals[24]. In MBOC, dissociated epithelial cells are first disseminated
on a preformed Matrigel layer in multi-well plates. They are co-incubated overnight with
viral particles or test chemicals in culture media. Chemical treatment is performed by
mixing culture media with S9 mix for metabolic activation when necessary[21]. The next day, culture media with
virus/chemical and floating dead cells are removed, the attached cells are covered with
additional Matrigel, and fresh culture media is added for growth. This results in the growth
of organoids with cystic/balloon structures in many cases (Fig. 1). Although almost all low-molecular-weight compounds are thought to penetrate the
Matrigel layer, exposure of dissociated epithelial cells to test chemicals can be surely
achieved during the establishment or passaging of organoids using MBOC.
Fig. 1.
(A) Illustration of the Matrigel bilayer organoid culture method. (B) Lung organoids
derived from a male B6J-wild type mouse in the control group, bar=100 μm. (C) Liver
(intrahepatic bile duct) organoids derived from a male B6J-Trp53
knockout mouse in the control group, bar=100 μm. B6J, C57BL/6J.
(A) Illustration of the Matrigel bilayer organoid culture method. (B) Lung organoids
derived from a male B6J-wild type mouse in the control group, bar=100 μm. (C) Liver
(intrahepatic bile duct) organoids derived from a male B6J-Trp53
knockout mouse in the control group, bar=100 μm. B6J, C57BL/6J.
Subcutaneous Injection of Chemically Treated Organoids into Nude Mice
To evaluate the tumorigenic potential of genetically reconstituted intestinal organoids,
lentiviral-transduced organoids were injected into nude mouse subcutis, followed by the
preparation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections and
histopathological evaluation using light microscopy[15]. The use of light microscopy for the evaluation of the organoid-derived
tissues after injection enabled reliable analysis of the genetic constitutions; in contrast
to the use of an inverted microscope which may not be effective to analyze even
morphological changes in organoids[15]. The
subcutaneous tissues derived from organoids of not only the intestines, but also the
lung[25], pancreas[18] and hepatobiliary tract[26], with and without genetic reconstitution, were
reported to demonstrate focal lesions with different histopathological characteristics,
including 1) Matrigel plugs containing microscopic round glandular organoids or no
epithelial cells, 2) non-tumorous nodules with a few dysplastic tubular glands lined up with
monolayered epithelial cells, 3) solid tumors consisting of tubular glands accompanied by
stromal infiltration, and 4) large solid tumors with cysts in which tumor glands were
densely packed with malignant characteristics[24]. The microscopic characteristics of each lesion indicated that normal
epithelia almost lost their proliferative potential in interstitial tissue filled with
weakly eosinophilic Matrigel (Matrigel plugs), and epithelial cells with preneoplastic
and/or neoplastic potentials selectively grew in nude mouse subcutis. Transplantation of
organoids into mice enabled us to understand the stepwise changes in carcinogenesis via FFPE
tissue section-based histopathology analysis. The genetically altered epithelial cells by
lentivirus-based RNAi-mediated knockdown, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, or treatment
with genotoxic carcinogens exhibited clonal expansion and/or progressed to visible tumors in
the mouse subcutis due to accelerated carcinogenesis[22].
Macroscopic Appearance of Subcutaneous Tissues in Nude Mice Does Not Necessarily
Indicate Tumorigenicity of Chemicals
In our previous report on an organoid-based chemical carcinogenesis model established using
normal mouse tissue-derived organoids, tumorigenicity of genotoxic carcinogens was
macroscopically confirmed in several cases[21]. For example, BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout
mouse-derived liver (intrahepatic bile duct) organoids treated in vitro
with EMS exhibited macroscopically visible yellowish solid changes and/or enlargement after
injection into nude mouse subcutis[21].
Histopathologically, they featured neoplastic characteristics, such as multilayered
epithelia and invasive growth of epithelia, and one was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma (Fig. 2A). BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived mammary organoids
treated in vitro with DMBA macroscopically exhibited tumorigenicity after
injection into nude mouse subcutis[21], and
the formation of adenocarcinomas was histopathologically confirmed (Fig. 2D). However, we previously described that brownish or blackish
colored changes, reflecting hemorrhage or cystic changes involving blood serum components,
do not necessarily reflect the tumorigenic potential of chemicals because they were also
observed in the non-treated control[21]. In
this review, several cases are presented for which the carcinogenic characteristics were
histopathologically observed but were not macroscopically detected. For example,
BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived lung organoids treated
with EMS showed no notable macroscopic changes (Fig.
3A), but microscopically observed multilayered epithelia and invasive growth of
epithelia into the surrounding interstitium suggested carcinogenic characteristics (Fig. 3B). In contrast, simple glandular structures
with monolayered epithelia were clearly demarcated from the surrounding
Matrigel/interstitium in the untreated control groups (Fig. 4A). C57BL/6J (B6J)-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived liver
(intrahepatic bile duct) organoids treated with DEN did not exhibit notable macroscopic
changes excluding cystic dilation after injection into the nude mouse subcutis (Fig. 5A); however, histopathological evaluation of the subcutaneous tissues showed irregular
glandular structures with multilayered epithelia in the DEN-treated groups (Fig. 5B). In contrast, simple glandular structures
with monolayered epithelia were observed in untreated control groups (Fig. 6A). The EMS- or DEN-treated organoids with multilayered epithelia/invasive growth of
epithelia were frequently surrounded by interstitial tissues with fibrous/inflammatory
reactions (Figs. 3B and 5B), in contrast to Matrigel plugs, whose interstitium mainly
consisted of retained Matrigel in the untreated control groups (Figs. 4A and 6A). In the
evaluation of the mouse normal tissue-derived organoid-based carcinogenesis model,
macroscopically observed tumorigenicity and microscopic epithelial changes reflecting the
early stages of carcinogenesis are among the requirements for carcinogenicity-positive
judgement. Lesions with multilayered and/or invasive epithelial cells can be evaluated in
hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, but immunohistochemistry for CKs or oncogenic
kinases is more useful for accurate diagnosis and molecular evaluation.
Fig. 2.
(A) Adenocarcinoma in the nude mouse subcutis after injection of male
BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived liver (intrahepatic
bile duct) organoids treated with EMS at 0.05 mM. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) A
serial section of (A) immunohistochemically stained for p-ERK1/2. Nuclear positivity
was observed in the carcinoma cells. (C) A serial section of (A) immunohistochemically
stained for p-Akt. Apical surface/cytoplasmic positivity was observed in the carcinoma
cells. (D) Adenocarcinoma in the nude mouse subcutis after injection of female
BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived mammary organoids
treated with DMBA at 0.6 μM. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (E) A serial section of (D)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Carcinoma cells were positive for CK19. (F) A
serial section of (D) immunohistochemically stained for αSMA. αSMA-positive cells
surrounding CK19-positive carcinoma cells. DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; EMS:
ethyl methanesulfonate; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin; αSMA: α
smooth muscle actin.
Fig. 3.
(A) Macroscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs and non-tumorous nodules in the nude
mouse subcutis after injection of male BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53
knockout mouse-derived lung organoids treated with EMS. Four nodules on the left, EMS
0 mM; four nodules in the middle, EMS 0.05 mM; four nodules on the right, EMS 0.2 mM.
No macroscopic changes were observed after EMS treatment. Bar=1 cm. (B) Glandular and
cystic structures with partly multilayered epithelia and invasive growth of epithelia
into the surrounding interstitium in a nodule of the 0.2 mM EMS-treated group
(arrows). H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Multilayered epithelia and/or invasion of
epithelial cells into the interstitium is shown (arrows). (D) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for p-ERK1/2. The lower photograph is a higher
magnification image of the lower left box. Focal nuclear positivity is observed in the
multilayered epithelia. (E) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for
p-Akt. The lower photograph is a higher magnification image of the lower left box.
Focal cytoplasmic positivity in the multilayered epithelia is observed. EMS: ethyl
methanesulfonate; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin.
Fig. 4.
(A) Microscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs in the nude mouse subcutis after
injection of male B6J wild type mouse-derived normal lung organoids. Retained round
glandular organoids are found in interstitial tissue filled with retained Matrigel.
Arrows; epithelial cells with cilia. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) Lung tissue of
normal alveolus and bronchiole of a mouse strain identical to (A). H&E staining,
bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (A) immunohistochemically stained for CK18. (D) A
serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for CK18. (E) A serial section of
(A) immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Submembranous reactions for CK18/CK19 can
be observed in organoid cells. (F) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically
stained for CK19. Submembranous/perinuclear reactions for CK18/CK19 are observed in
bronchiolar and alveolar epithelia. B6J: C57BL/6J; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK:
cytokeratin.
Fig. 5.
(A) Macroscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs and non-tumorous nodules in the nude
mouse subcutis after injection of male B6J-heterozygous Trp53
knockout mouse-derived normal liver (intrahepatic bile duct) organoids treated with
DEN. Four nodules on the left, DEN 0 mM; four nodules in the middle, DEN 0.2 mM; four
nodules on the right, DEN 1.0 mM. No macroscopic changes excluding cystic dilation
were observed after DEN treatment. Bar=1 cm. (B) Irregular glandular structures with
multilayered epithelia and interstitial fibrous reactions in a nodule in the 0.2 mM
DEN-treated group. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Multilayered and/or invasive epithelial cells
can be observed. (D) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for
p-ERK1/2. The lower photograph is a higher magnification image of the lower middle
box. No reaction was noted. (E) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained
for p-Akt. The lower photograph is a higher magnification image of the lower middle
box. Cytoplasmic positivity in the multilayered epithelia can be observed. B6J:
C57BL/6J; DEN: diethylnitrosamine; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK:
cytokeratin.
Fig. 6.
(A) Microscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs in the nude mouse subcutis after
injection of male B6J wild type mouse-derived normal liver (intrahepatic bile duct)
organoids. Retained round glandular organoids are observed in interstitial tissue
filled with retained Matrigel. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) Normal hepatic cell
cord and interlobular ductule/vessel appearance in a mouse strain identical to (A).
H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (A) immunohistochemically stained
for CK18. (D) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for CK18. (E) A
serial section of (A) with immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Submembranous
reactions for CK18/CK19 can be observed in organoid cells. (F) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Cytoplasmic reactions in bile ducts and
submembranous reactions in hepatocytes for CK18 can be observed. B6J: C57BL/6J;
H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin.
(A) Adenocarcinoma in the nude mouse subcutis after injection of male
BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived liver (intrahepatic
bile duct) organoids treated with EMS at 0.05 mM. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) A
serial section of (A) immunohistochemically stained for p-ERK1/2. Nuclear positivity
was observed in the carcinoma cells. (C) A serial section of (A) immunohistochemically
stained for p-Akt. Apical surface/cytoplasmic positivity was observed in the carcinoma
cells. (D) Adenocarcinoma in the nude mouse subcutis after injection of female
BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived mammary organoids
treated with DMBA at 0.6 μM. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (E) A serial section of (D)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Carcinoma cells were positive for CK19. (F) A
serial section of (D) immunohistochemically stained for αSMA. αSMA-positive cells
surrounding CK19-positive carcinoma cells. DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; EMS:
ethyl methanesulfonate; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin; αSMA: α
smooth muscle actin.(A) Macroscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs and non-tumorous nodules in the nude
mouse subcutis after injection of male BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53
knockout mouse-derived lung organoids treated with EMS. Four nodules on the left, EMS
0 mM; four nodules in the middle, EMS 0.05 mM; four nodules on the right, EMS 0.2 mM.
No macroscopic changes were observed after EMS treatment. Bar=1 cm. (B) Glandular and
cystic structures with partly multilayered epithelia and invasive growth of epithelia
into the surrounding interstitium in a nodule of the 0.2 mM EMS-treated group
(arrows). H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Multilayered epithelia and/or invasion of
epithelial cells into the interstitium is shown (arrows). (D) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for p-ERK1/2. The lower photograph is a higher
magnification image of the lower left box. Focal nuclear positivity is observed in the
multilayered epithelia. (E) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for
p-Akt. The lower photograph is a higher magnification image of the lower left box.
Focal cytoplasmic positivity in the multilayered epithelia is observed. EMS: ethyl
methanesulfonate; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin.(A) Microscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs in the nude mouse subcutis after
injection of male B6J wild type mouse-derived normal lung organoids. Retained round
glandular organoids are found in interstitial tissue filled with retained Matrigel.
Arrows; epithelial cells with cilia. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) Lung tissue of
normal alveolus and bronchiole of a mouse strain identical to (A). H&E staining,
bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (A) immunohistochemically stained for CK18. (D) A
serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for CK18. (E) A serial section of
(A) immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Submembranous reactions for CK18/CK19 can
be observed in organoid cells. (F) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically
stained for CK19. Submembranous/perinuclear reactions for CK18/CK19 are observed in
bronchiolar and alveolar epithelia. B6J: C57BL/6J; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK:
cytokeratin.(A) Macroscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs and non-tumorous nodules in the nude
mouse subcutis after injection of male B6J-heterozygous Trp53
knockout mouse-derived normal liver (intrahepatic bile duct) organoids treated with
DEN. Four nodules on the left, DEN 0 mM; four nodules in the middle, DEN 0.2 mM; four
nodules on the right, DEN 1.0 mM. No macroscopic changes excluding cystic dilation
were observed after DEN treatment. Bar=1 cm. (B) Irregular glandular structures with
multilayered epithelia and interstitial fibrous reactions in a nodule in the 0.2 mM
DEN-treated group. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Multilayered and/or invasive epithelial cells
can be observed. (D) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for
p-ERK1/2. The lower photograph is a higher magnification image of the lower middle
box. No reaction was noted. (E) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained
for p-Akt. The lower photograph is a higher magnification image of the lower middle
box. Cytoplasmic positivity in the multilayered epithelia can be observed. B6J:
C57BL/6J; DEN: diethylnitrosamine; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK:
cytokeratin.(A) Microscopic appearance of Matrigel plugs in the nude mouse subcutis after
injection of male B6J wild type mouse-derived normal liver (intrahepatic bile duct)
organoids. Retained round glandular organoids are observed in interstitial tissue
filled with retained Matrigel. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) Normal hepatic cell
cord and interlobular ductule/vessel appearance in a mouse strain identical to (A).
H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (C) A serial section of (A) immunohistochemically stained
for CK18. (D) A serial section of (B) immunohistochemically stained for CK18. (E) A
serial section of (A) with immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Submembranous
reactions for CK18/CK19 can be observed in organoid cells. (F) A serial section of (B)
immunohistochemically stained for CK19. Cytoplasmic reactions in bile ducts and
submembranous reactions in hepatocytes for CK18 can be observed. B6J: C57BL/6J;
H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin.
CK Immunohistochemistry Assisted Evaluation of Multilayered Epithelia/Invasive Changes
in Chemically Treated Organoids
CK composition varies depending on the epithelial cell type (simple vs. stratified),
cellular growth state (normal vs. hyperproliferative), stage of development, differentiation
program, and disease state[27]. All human
CKs can be divided into acidic (type I subfamily; CKs 9-20, partly react with the AE1
antibody) and basic (type II subfamily; CKs 1-8; react with the AE3 antibody) CKs, and they
exist with specific pairing of type I and type II subfamilies into a heterotypic tetramer in
almost all epithelial tissues[27],
[28]. The tissue-specific
distribution of CKs in human tissues is highly similar to that in mouse tissues, with
several exceptions[29].Primary antibodies used for CK and α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) immunohistochemistry,
specimen pretreatment, and signal detection methods have been previously described[22]. To detect epithelial cell-derived changes in
the Matrigel plugs and organoid-derived tissues, an anti-mouse CK19 rabbit monoclonal
antibody (clone EPNCIR127B, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used after antigen retrieval in an
autoclave in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0), which was suitable for minimizing background
staining.Both lung and liver organoids (intrahepatic bile duct) were CK19 positive. Therefore, in
the evaluation of carcinogenicity of chemicals using the mouse normal tissue-derived
organoid-based carcinogenesis model, multilayered and/or invasive epithelial cells were
clearly visualized following immunohistochemical staining for CK19 (Figs. 3C and 5C). In
contrast, monolayered epithelial cells clearly demarcated from the surrounding
Matrigel/interstitium were observed in the untreated control groups (Figs. 4C and 6C).
Accordingly, CK19 immunohistochemistry was useful for confirming the multilayered epithelia
and distribution of extraductal invasive lesions for accurate diagnosis in the early stages
of carcinogenesis. Immunohistochemistry for CKs other than CK19 was also performed in three
organs/tissues. In this case, normal lung and liver tissues excised from male B6J mice and
mammary tissue from female heterogeneous BALB/c-Trp53 knockout or wild-type
mice at 5 weeks of age (at which age organs/tissues for organoid culture were collected in
our laboratory) were used. FFPE sections were prepared for comparative evaluation of
organoids and normal organs/tissues.Lung: Bronchiolar columnar cells and some cuboidal alveolar epithelial cells, which were
presumed to be type 2 alveolar cells, were positive for CK19 and weakly positive for CK18
(Table 1, Fig. 4D–4F)[30]. Both CKs exhibited typical submembranous and
perinuclear localization. Pulmonary epithelial cells were negative for CK14.
Immunohistochemistry for CKs in Matrigel plugs in nude mouse subcutis revealed positive
reactions similar to normal lung tissues, that is, positive for CK19 and weakly positive for
CK18, supporting their bronchiolar-alveolar cell origin[21] (Fig. 4B, 4C). Normal lung
tissue-derived organoids were characterized by scattered ciliated epithelia (Fig. 4A), further demonstrating their origin.
Table 1.
Immunohistochemical Localization of Epithelial Markers in Major Murine
Organs/Tissues
Liver: The intrahepatic bile ducts were positive for CK19 and weakly positive for CK18
(Table 1, Fig. 6D–6F). Weak immunoreactivity for CK18 was also observed in hepatocytes, as
previously reported[31]. Liver-derived
organoid cells, which were cultured in appropriately prepared media for differentiation into
bile ducts[21], were positive for CK19 and
weakly positive for CK18 after their injection into nude mouse subcutis (Fig. 6B, 6C), supporting their intrahepatic bile duct
epithelial cell origin. Bile ducts and hepatocytes were negative for CK14.Mammary tissue: The mammary epithelium consists of subtypes of luminal (ductal and alveolar
luminal cells) and myoepithelial cells[32].
In normal mammary tissues, the mammary ducts and glands are surrounded by adipose tissue
(Fig. 7C). Immunohistochemistry revealed that the ductal/alveolar luminal cells were positive
for CK18 and CK19 (Table 1, Fig. 7D), and the myoepithelial cells were positive for αSMA and CK14
(Fig. 7E and 7F). Mammary organoid cells in
Matrigel plugs in nude mouse subcutis were positive for CK18 and CK19[22]. In contrast, the number of organoids
containing αSMA- and/or CK14-positive cells was lower than that of the original mammary
tissues (Fig. 7A and 7B), suggesting that
ductal/alveolar luminal cells were predominantly cultured under previously reported culture
conditions[21]. However, in the
DMBA-induced adenocarcinoma developed after injection of BALB/c-heterozygous
Trp53 knockout mouse-derived mammary organoids into the nude mouse
subcutis, not only CK19-positive carcinoma cells but also αSMA-positive cells were found
surrounding the CK19-positive carcinoma cells (Fig. 2E
and 2F). This suggested that both the CK19-positive luminal cells and the
αSMA-positive myoepithelial cells were genetically altered by in vitro DMBA
treatment, resulting in carcinoma formation comprising both types of carcinoma
cells[22].
Fig. 7.
(A) Matrigel plugs in the nude mouse subcutis after injection of female BALB/c wild
type mouse-derived normal mammary organoids. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) A serial
section of (A) immunohistochemically stained for αSMA. (C) Normal immature mammary
gland/duct surrounded by adipose tissue in a same mouse strain identical to (A).
H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (D) A serial section of (C) immunohistochemically stained
for CK19. Ductal and alveolar luminal cells showing strong cytoplasmic positivity can
be observed. (E) A serial section of (C) immunohistochemically stained for αSMA.
Positive myoepithelial cells surrounding ducts and glands can be observed. Note
vascular walls are also positive for αSMA (asterisk). (F) A serial section of (C)
immunohistochemically stained for CK14. Ductular myoepithelial cells are positive and
glandular myoepithelial cells are partly positive for CK14. Note, vascular walls are
CK14 negative (asterisk). H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin; αSMA: α
smooth muscle actin.
(A) Matrigel plugs in the nude mouse subcutis after injection of female BALB/c wild
type mouse-derived normal mammary organoids. H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (B) A serial
section of (A) immunohistochemically stained for αSMA. (C) Normal immature mammary
gland/duct surrounded by adipose tissue in a same mouse strain identical to (A).
H&E staining, bar=50 μm. (D) A serial section of (C) immunohistochemically stained
for CK19. Ductal and alveolar luminal cells showing strong cytoplasmic positivity can
be observed. (E) A serial section of (C) immunohistochemically stained for αSMA.
Positive myoepithelial cells surrounding ducts and glands can be observed. Note
vascular walls are also positive for αSMA (asterisk). (F) A serial section of (C)
immunohistochemically stained for CK14. Ductular myoepithelial cells are positive and
glandular myoepithelial cells are partly positive for CK14. Note, vascular walls are
CK14 negative (asterisk). H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; CK: cytokeratin; αSMA: α
smooth muscle actin.
Expression of Oncogenic Kinases Indicated Molecular Activation of Epithelia in the
Early Stages of Chemical Carcinogenesis
Protein kinases regulate key processes in cell activities such as cellular proliferation,
survival, and migration. Therefore, it is well recognized that dysregulation of protein
kinases due to genetic and epigenetic changes plays a role in many hallmarks of
cancer[33]. In the present review, two
principal oncogenic kinases were selected as immunohistochemical markers,
phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK) 1/2 and phospho-v-akt murine thymoma
viral oncogene homolog (p-Akt), demonstrating that certain histopathological changes are
associated with an early phase of carcinogenesis.Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) is a member of the mammalian family of
mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), and the ERK signaling pathway plays a key role in
several steps of tumorigenesis, including cancer cell proliferation, migration, and
invasion[34]. This pathway is a
convergent signaling node that receives input from numerous stimuli, including internal
metabolic stress, DNA damage pathways, and altered protein concentrations, in addition to
signals from external growth factors, cell-matrix interactions, and communication between
cells[35]. Furthermore, several
mutations involving the MAPK/ERK pathway, such as those in the epithelial growth factor
receptor gene (EGFR), RAS, and BRAF, have
been identified as drivers of carcinogenesis[35]. No mutations in genes encoding ERK kinases (MAPK1 and
MAPK2) have been reported as drivers of human cancers, but mutations in
RAS and RAF oncogenes promote human cancers through
phosphorylation of ERK kinases, which leads to their activation[36]. The anti-phospho-ERK1 (T202/Y204) and ERK2 (T185/Y187) rabbit
polyclonal antibodies from R&D Systems (AF1018; Minneapolis, MN, USA), and an
avidin-biotin peroxidase method (Histofine, SAB-PO, Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) were
used to assess the expression and localization of the antigens using immunohistochemistry.
Antigen retrieval was conducted in an autoclave in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) prior to the
immunoreactions. In EMS-induced adenocarcinoma developed due to injection of
BALB/c-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mouse-derived liver (intrahepatic bile
duct) organoids, nuclear positivity for p-ERK1/2 was clearly observed (Fig. 2B), demonstrating that activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway is
involved in carcinogenesis. In the case of EMS-treated lung organoids derived from the same
mouse strain, focal nuclear positivity for p-ERK1/2 was observed in the multilayered
epithelia (Fig. 3D) after the injection of this
organoid into nude mouse subcutis, but the number of cells and areas with positive reaction
were limited. The results suggested that EMS-induced early stage changes in carcinogenesis
were observed after injection of the less sensitive lung organoids by
p-ERK1/2-immunohistochemistry in contrast to the changes observed after injection of more
sensitive liver (intrahepatic bile duct) organoids. No reactions were observed in the
multilayered epithelia from DEN-treated liver (intrahepatic bile duct) organoids of
B6J-heterozygous Trp53 knockout mice (Fig. 5D) after their injection, suggesting that DEN-induced carcinogenesis is
associated with signaling pathways other than the MAPK/ERK pathway. No p-ERK1/2 positivity
was observed in the untreated control group (data not shown).AKT is a serine/threonine kinase and oncogenic protein that regulates cell survival,
proliferation, growth, apoptosis, and glycogen metabolism[37]. AKT is activated by phosphorylation at Thr308 or Ser473 and
its induction interferes with normal regulatory mechanisms activating mTOR[37]. An anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473) rabbit
monoclonal antibody from Cell Signaling Technology (clone D9E, #4060; Danvers, MA, USA) and
a one-step immunohistochemistry method (SignalStain Boost IHC Detection Reagent, Cell
Signaling Technologies) were used to assess the expression and localization of the antigens.
Antigen retrieval was conducted in an autoclave in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) prior to the
immunoreactions. In EMS-induced adenocarcinoma from BALB/c-heterozygous
Trp53 knockout mouse-derived liver (intrahepatic bile duct) organoids,
apical surface/cytoplasmic positivity for p-Akt was observed (Fig. 2C), demonstrating that activation of the Akt pathway was
partially involved in carcinogenesis. Focal cytoplasmic positivity (Fig. 3E) and partial cytoplasmic positivity (Fig. 5E) were observed in the multilayered epithelia of EMS-treated
lung organoids from BALB/c heterozygous Trp53 knockout mice and DEN-treated
liver (intrahepatic bile duct) organoids from B6J-heterozygous Trp53
knockout mice. No p-Akt positivity was observed in the untreated control group (data not
shown). Therefore, EMS- and DEN-induced carcinogenesis may be partly associated with Akt
activation in an organoid-based carcinogenesis model.
Conclusion
In the present review, we discuss our current understanding of the histopathological and
immunohistochemical characteristics of mouse normal tissue-derived organoids and tumors
derived from these organoids after their in vitro treatment with genotoxic
carcinogens and injection into nude mouse. In a recently reported organoid-based
carcinogenesis model, normal lung/liver/mammary tissue-derived organoids from wild-type or
heterogeneous BALB/c-Trp53 knockout mice with B6J or BALB/c background were
treated with several genotoxic carcinogens such as EMS and DEN. They exhibited macroscopic
tumorigenicity as well as histopathological findings characteristic of the early stages of
carcinogenesis, such as multilayered epithelia and/or invasive growth of epithelia. In
contrast, simple glandular structures with monolayered epithelia were clearly demarcated
from the surrounding Matrigel/interstitium in the untreated control groups. Clear
immunohistochemical positivity for CK19 was observed in both lung bronchiolar-alveolar
epithelial cells, intrahepatic bile ducts, and their organoid counterparts. Accordingly,
CK19 immunohistochemistry was useful for confirming the multilayered epithelia and
distribution of extraductal invasive lesions for accurate diagnosis in the early stages of
carcinogenesis. Immunohistochemistry for two principal oncogenic kinases, p-ERK 1/2 and
p-Akt, suggested the molecular activation of epithelia in the early stages of chemical
carcinogenesis depending on the carcinogen used. This review improves our biological
understanding of organoid-based chemical carcinogenesis models. Further studies are required
to identify other molecular markers indicating early stages in the organoid-based chemical
carcinogenesis model to apply it to other organs/tissues and chemicals.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Authors: Toshiro Sato; Robert G Vries; Hugo J Snippert; Marc van de Wetering; Nick Barker; Daniel E Stange; Johan H van Es; Arie Abo; Pekka Kujala; Peter J Peters; Hans Clevers Journal: Nature Date: 2009-03-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jarno Drost; Richard H van Jaarsveld; Bas Ponsioen; Cheryl Zimberlin; Ruben van Boxtel; Arjan Buijs; Norman Sachs; René M Overmeer; G Johan Offerhaus; Harry Begthel; Jeroen Korving; Marc van de Wetering; Gerald Schwank; Meike Logtenberg; Edwin Cuppen; Hugo J Snippert; Jan Paul Medema; Geert J P L Kops; Hans Clevers Journal: Nature Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 49.962