| Literature DB >> 35832433 |
Ling Zhang1, Yi-Er Zhou1, Yue-Jin Wu2, Li-Mei Wu1, Shi-Shi Li1, Lin Zhang1, Zhen Jin1, Chong-Yi Shu1, Wei-Hai Xu1, Jing Shu1.
Abstract
A randomized sibling-embryo pilot trial investigated whether two ways of laser-assisted hatching result in different blastulation and clinical outcomes after extended in vitro culture process of highly fragmented day-3 cleavage embryos. From 92 couples, a total of 315 highly fragmented day-3 embryos (the fragmentation >25%) were recruited and randomized into laser-assisted zona thinning (LAT, n=157) and opening (LAO, n=158) groups, and then underwent a blastocyst culture in vitro. The main endpoint measurements including blastocyst formation and grading as well as the clinical pregnancy after blastocyst transfer were obtained during the treatment procedure of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, and then analyzed with generalized estimating equation (GEE) and/or time-to blastocyst analysis models. A total of 166 day-3 embryos developed into blastocyst stage (52.70%), of which 97 were viable blastocysts (30.79%), and 42 top-quality ones (13.33%). LAT did not have any inferior or superior to LAO in the endpoints of either total, viable, top-quality or hatched blastocyst formation, with the ORs (95%CI) from GEE model as 0.89 (0.55-1.45), 0.71 (0.42-1.21), 1.12 (0.56-2.25) and 0.68 (0.42-1.12) respectively for LAT treatment. And the time-to-blastocyst analysis showed a similar result. Additionally, no difference in clinical outcomes after blastocyst transfer was found between the two groups. The author concluded that when applying the LAHs during the extended culture of highly fragmented embryos, both LAT and LAO can generate a promising clinical outcome, and the LAT operation be equivalent to the LAO. Future well-designed, multiple-center, larger-sample investigations are required to ascertain above conclusion.Entities:
Keywords: blastocyst; fragmentation; in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer; laser-assisted hatching (LAH); oocyte utilization
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35832433 PMCID: PMC9271933 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.927834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Baseline characteristics of included couples.
| Parameter | Values |
|---|---|
| No. of couples (n) | 92 |
| Female age (yrs.) | 30 (28–32) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.27 ± 2.59 |
| AMH (ng/mL) | 4.49 (2.85-7.14) |
| Basic FSH (IU/L) | 4.88 4.00-5.65) |
| AFC (n) | 15 (10-25) |
| Infertility duration (yrs.) | 2.0 (1.0-3.5) |
| Unexplained infertility [n (%)] | 5 (5.43) |
| Primary infertility [n (%)] | 46 (50.00%) |
| Controlled ovarian stimulating protocol [n (%)] | |
| Mini-stimulation | 25 (27.17) |
| Long protocol | 8 (8.70) |
| GnRH-ant | 59 (64.13) |
| ICSI [n (%)] | 38 (41.30) |
| Gn dose (IU) | 2250 (1450-2700) |
| Days of Gn (d) | 10 (9-11) |
| No. of oocytes (n) | 15 (11-19) |
Continuous variables were described as median (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index; AMH, anti-Mullerian hormone; AFC, antral follicle count; ICSI, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Figure 1Distribution of blastomere number and fragments between the two groups. (A) blastomere number, and (B) embryo fragments. LAT, laser-assisted thinning; LAO, laser-assisted opening.
Characteristic and blastocyst cultural outcome between the two groups.
| Parameter | LAT | LAO | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 157 | 158 | |
| Blastomere amount at Day 3 (n) | 5 (5-6) | 5 (5-6) | 0.972 |
| Embryo fragment at Day 3 (%) | 30 (25-35) | 30 (25-35) | 0.343 |
| Blastocyst rate [n (%)] | |||
| Total | 81 (51.59) | 85 (53.80) | 0.695 |
| Day 5 | 64 (40.76) | 65 (41.14) | 0.946 |
| Viable blastocyst rate [n (%)] | |||
| Total | 44 (28.03) | 53 (33.54) | 0.289 |
| Day 5 | 27 (17.20) | 38 (24.05) | 0.132 |
| Top-quality blastocyst rate [n (%)] | |||
| Total | 22 (14.29) | 20 (12.66) | 0.724 |
| Day 5 | 17 (10.83) | 17 (10.76) | 0.984 |
| Hatched blastocyst rate [n (%)] | |||
| Total | 50 (31.85) | 62 (39.24) | 0.170 |
| Day 5 | 23 (14.65) | 36 (22.78) | 0.061 |
*P value was calculated based by non-parameter Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variable and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. LAT, laser-assisted thinning, LAO, laser-assisted opening.
GEE analysis and time-to-blastocyst analysis on the blastocyte culture outcomes of fragmented day-3 embryos.
| Parameters | GEE model † | Time-to-blastocyst ‡ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORs* | 95% CI | P values | ORs* | 95% CI | P values | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Female age | 0.96 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.209 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.424 |
| BMI | 0.91 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.062 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.181 |
| Primary infertility | 0.61 | 0.36 | 1.03 | 0.064 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.214 |
| Blastomere number | 1.79 | 1.36 | 2.35 | <0.001 | 1.24 | 0.90 | 1.02 | <0.001 |
| Fragment# | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.98 | 0.031 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.016 |
| ICSI | 1.52 | 0.90 | 2.56 | 0.117 | 1.13 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.441 |
| LAH style | 0.89 | 0.55 | 1.45 | 0.647 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.621 |
| Female age | 1.00 | 0.94 | 1.07 | 0.958 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.960 |
| BMI | 0.90 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.048 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.108 |
| Primary infertility | 0.72 | 0.42 | 1.24 | 0.235 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.339 |
| Blastomere number | 1.52 | 1.23 | 1.88 | <0.001 | 1.30 | 0.90 | 1.02 | <0.001 |
| Fragment# | 0.67 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.001 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.002 |
| ICSI | 1.03 | 0.60 | 1.77 | 0.926 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.927 |
| LAH style | 0.71 | 0.42 | 1.21 | 0.210 | 0.76 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.190 |
| Female age | 0.96 | 0.88 | 1.05 | 0.331 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.319 |
| BMI | 0.92 | 0.80 | 1.05 | 0.207 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.219 |
| Primary infertility | 1.32 | 0.63 | 2.76 | 0.456 | 1.27 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.426 |
| Blastomere number | 1.64 | 1.30 | 2.06 | <0.001 | 1.47 | 0.90 | 1.02 | <0.001 |
| Fragment# | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.91 | 0.014 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.009 |
| ICSI | 0.57 | 0.27 | 1.23 | 0.154 | 0.64 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.151 |
| LAH style | 1.12 | 0.56 | 2.25 | 0.745 | 1.08 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.775 |
| Female age | 0.99 | 0.93 | 1.06 | 0.856 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.740 |
| BMI | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.98 | 0.022 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.012 |
| Primary infertility | 0.89 | 0.53 | 1.51 | 0.674 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.906 |
| Blastomere number | 1.57 | 1.26 | 1.94 | <0.001 | 1.32 | 0.90 | 1.02 | <0.001 |
| Fragment# | 0.97 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.103 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.036 |
| ICSI | 1.15 | 0.68 | 1.94 | 0.598 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.995 |
| LAH style | 0.68 | 0.42 | 1.12 | 0.132 | 0.73 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.063 |
†Cluster-weighted GEE analysis adjusted for the covariates of female age, BMI, primary infertility as well as day-3 embryos parameters;
‡For blastocyst and viable blastocyst formation, Cox proportional hazards regression model was used, and for top-quality and hatched blastocyst formation, the fine and Gray model used. Covariates were properly adjusted for the covariates of female age, BMI, primary infertility and ICSI as well as day-3 embryos parameters.
*When calculating the effect of LAT and primary infertility, LAO and secondary infertility were the references, respectively; Female age, BMI, blastomere amount and fragment were continuous variables here.
#The probability of total, viable, high-quality and hatched blastocysts with the amount of increasement of fragmentation rate by 5%.
Characteristics and clinical outcomes of blastocyte transfer.
| Parameter | LAT | LAO | P values* |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 16 | 13 | |
| Top-quality blastocyst [n (%)] | 8 (50.00) | 5 (38.46) | 0.534 |
| Clinical pregnancy [n (%)] | 13 (81.25) | 10 (76.92) | 0.775 |
| Ongoing pregnancy [n (%)] | 10 (62.50) | 9 (69.23) | 0.704 |
| Miscarriage [n (%)] | 3 (23.08) | 1 (10.00) | 0.401 |
*P value was calculated based on Fisher exact test.
Multi-variate analysis with GEE on clinical outcomes after blastocyst transfer.
|
| ORs* | 95% CI | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Clinical pregnancy | ||||
| Female age | 1.02 | 0.82 | 1.26 | 0.886 |
| LAT | 0.85 | 0.14 | 5.00 | 0.854 |
| Ongoing pregnancy | ||||
| Female age | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.21 | 0.992 |
| LAT | 1.50 | 0.31 | 7.32 | 0.617 |
| Miscarriage | ||||
| Female age | 0.96 | 0.72 | 1.28 | 0.782 |
| LAT | 3.03 | 0.29 | 33.33 | 0.358 |
*Effect of LAT styles were evaluated as risk ratio (95% CI) with LAO operation as the reference.