| Literature DB >> 35832364 |
Kamat Rohan1, Ananthakrishnan Ramesh1, K Nagarajan1, K M Abdulbasith2, Sathasivam Sureshkumar2, Chellappa Vijayakumar2, K Balamourougan2, B H Srinivas3.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic role of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) in differentiating benign and malignant cervical nodes.Entities:
Keywords: Acoustic radiation force impulse; Virtual Touch imaging; acoustic radiation force impulse imaging; area ratio; cervical lymph nodes; shear wave velocity
Year: 2021 PMID: 35832364 PMCID: PMC9272720 DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_10_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ultrasound ISSN: 0929-6441
Results of fine-needle aspiration cytology/biopsy from the cervical lymph nodes
| Etiopathological diagnoses | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Reactive nodes | 53 |
| Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas | 35 |
| Tuberculous/granulomatous nodes | 24 |
| Metastatic adenocarcinomas | 17 |
| Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas | 17 |
| Metastatic thyroid carcinomas | 8 |
| Metastatic undifferentiated carcinomas | 5 |
| Chronic lymphoid leukemia | 2 |
| Necrotizing lymphadenitis | 1 |
| Lupus lymphadenitis | 1 |
| Metastatic anaplastic carcinoma | 1 |
| Metastatic sarcoma | 1 |
| Metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma | 1 |
| Highly suspicious of malignancy | 1 |
| Total | 166 |
Results of acoustic radiation force impulse
| Parameters | Features | Malignant (87) (%) | Benign (79) (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTI (two grades) | Predominantly dark | 75 (86.2) | 22 (27.8) | 86.2 | 72.1 | 79.5 | - |
| Predominantly bright | 12 (13.8) | 57 (72.2) | |||||
| Area ratio (cutoff: 1.155) | ≥1.155 | 62 (71.3) | 14 (17.7) | 71.3 | 82.3 | 76.5 | 0.842 |
| <1.155 | 25 (28.7) | 65 (82.3) | |||||
| SWV (m/s) | ≥2.68 | 71 (81.6) | 15 (19.0) | 81.6 | 81.0 | 81.3 | 0.856 |
| <2.68 | 16 (18.4) | 64 (81.0) |
VTI: Virtual Touch imaging, SWV: Shear wave velocity, AUC: Area under the curve
Figure 1A 50-year-old woman with a metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma of a cervical lymph node. (a) Grayscale ultrasound image (b) Predominantly dark elastogram on Virtual Touch imaging. (c) Area ratio – 1.3 (d) Shear wave velocity – 4.65 m/s (obtained from another cervical lymph node from the same patient)
Figure 2(a) Receiver operator characteristic curves-median area ratio (area under the curve – 0.842) (b) receiver operator characteristic curves-median shear wave velocity (area under the curve – 0.856)
Figure 3A 22-year-old woman with a reactive cervical lymph node (a) Grayscale ultrasound image (b) Predominantly bright elastogram on Virtual Touch imaging (c) Area ratio – 0.90 (d) Shear wave velocity – 1.57 m/s (obtained from another cervical lymph node from the same patient)
Shear wave velocity of the common benign and malignant cervical nodes
| Causes ( | Median SWV in (m/s) with (IQR) |
|---|---|
| All benign nodes (79) | 1.9 (1.56–2.55) |
| All malignant nodes (87) | 6.7 (2.87–9.1) |
| TB and granulomatous LN (24) | 2.5 (1.89–3.78) |
| Reactive nodes (53) | 1.7 (1.48–2.1) |
| Lymphomas (17) | 2.5 (2.11–4.14) |
| Metastatic thyroid carcinoma (7) | 3.5 (2.6–9.1) |
| Metastatic adenocarcinoma (17) | 9.1 (6.6–9.1) |
| Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (35) | 9.1 (4.3–9.1) |
IQR: Interquartile range, TB: Tuberculosis, LN: Lymph nodes
Figure 4A 49-year-old man with a tuberculosis cervical lymph node. This heterogeneous cervical lymph node showed a high shear wave velocity of 4.37 m/s
Figure 5A 57-year-old woman with a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervical lymph node from a breast cancer. This ill-defined hypoechoic lymph node showed a shear wave velocity of X.XX. This was considered as 9.1 m/s based on the manufacturer recommendations
Shear wave velocity cutoffs generated in different studies to differentiate benign and malignant cervical nodes
| Study | Mean/median SWV of benign nodes (m/s) | Mean/median SWV of malignant nodes (m/s) | SWV cutoff (m/s) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present study | 1.9 (1.56–2.55)* | 6.7 (2.87–9.1)* | 2.68* | 81.6 | 81 |
| Meng | 2.01 ± 0.95† | 4.61 ± 2.56† | 2.595† | 82.9 | 93.1 |
| Fujiwara | 1.52 ± 0.48* | 2.46 ± 0.75* | 1.9* | 95 | 81.8 |
| Cheng | 2.71 ± 0.85† | 4.46 ± 1.46† | 3.34† | 78.9 | 74.4 |
| Zhang | 2.32 ± 0.57† | 4.36 ± 1.25† | 3.14† | 77.1 | 85.7 |
*Median with IQR, †Mean ± SD. IQR: Interquartile range, SD: Standard deviation, SWV: Shear wave velocity