| Literature DB >> 35832097 |
Amin Ghaffari1, Akram Azad1, Mehdi Alizadeh Zarei1, Mehdi Rassafiani2, Hamid Sharif Nia3.
Abstract
Background: Children with a specific learning disability (SLD) have deficits in everyday occupations along with executive function in addition to academic issues. Objective: The present study is aimed at investigating the effectiveness of Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) and the Four-Quadrant Model of Facilitated Learning (4QM) interventions on the participation in occupational performance and executive function skills in children with SLD. Method: This study was a single-case experimental design (multiple baselines) in which six children with SLD were randomly assigned to three groups. In the baseline phase, three groups of children underwent repeated executive function assessments using the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) in the multiple baselines. In the intervention phase, all six mothers of children with SLD individually received OPC and 4QM interventions once a week for 14 sessions of 60 minutes and during this period, children were evaluated six more times for executive function skills according to SCWT and WCST. In addition, The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at the beginning and the end of the baseline phase and the end of the intervention phase were completed by mothers of children with SLD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35832097 PMCID: PMC9246646 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4654204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Occup Ther Int ISSN: 0966-7903 Impact factor: 1.565
Participants' demographic variables at baseline.
| Children | Group | Gender | Age (year) | Level of education | Intelligence quotient (full scale) | Mother's age (year) | Mother's education | Mother's job |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child 1 | 1 | Male | 8.50 | Second | 90.00 | 40.00 | Associate | Housewife |
| Child 2 | 2 | Male | 9.50 | Third | 90.00 | 44.00 | Bachelor | Employee |
| Child 3 | 1 | Female | 10.50 | Fourth | 90.00 | 43.00 | Bachelor | Housewife |
| Child 4 | 3 | Male | 8 | Second | 100.00 | 38.00 | Associate | Employee |
| Child 5 | 2 | Male | 8 | Second | 80.00 | 41.00 | Bachelor | Housewife |
| Child 6 | 3 | Male | 8 | Second | 85.00 | 39.00 | Associate | Housewife |
List of the three goals of each child and rating of children in performance and satisfaction according to the COPM.
| Children | 3 selected goals in order of importance | Performance | Satisfaction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline A | Baseline B | Intervention | Baseline A | Baseline B | Intervention | ||
| Child 1 | Cleaning rooms and personal spaces | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Preparing school bag | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 10 | |
| Participate in board games | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| Child 2 | Optimal use of TV and mobile | 2 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Do homework | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
| Cleaning rooms and personal spaces | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 10 | |
| Child 3 | Participate in cultural and artistic activities | 1 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| Activity in social institutions | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 8 | |
| Attend extracurricular classes | 2 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| Child 4 | Wearing and taking off shoes | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| Do homework | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| Bathing independently | 1 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Child 5 | Preparing school bag | 2 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Performing imaginary games | 1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
| Participate in board games | 2 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Child 6 | Select, wear, and take off clothes | 2 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Play with picky toys like Lego | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Do homework | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
Figure 1Scores for the executive function according to SCWT.
Figure 2Scores for the executive function according to WCST.
Executive function changes following BRIEF.
| Children | Baseline A (beginning) | Baseline B (end) | Percentage change (%) (baseline A and B) | Cohen's | Intervention | Percentage change (%) (baseline B and intervention) | Cohen's | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRI | MI | GEC | BRI | MI | GEC | BRI | MI | GEC | BRI | MI | GEC | BRI | MI | GEC | BRI | MI | GEC | BRI | MI | GEC | |
| Child 1 | 54.00 | 97.00 | 151.00 | 52.00 | 93.00 | 145.00 | -3.70 | -4.12 | -3.97 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 45.00 | 83.00 | 128.00 | -13.46 | -10.75 | -11.72 | 1.40 | 1.47 | 1.21 |
| Child 2 | 57.00 | 100.00 | 157.00 | 55.00 | 96.00 | 151.00 | -3.50 | -4 | -3.82 | 43.00 | 76.00 | 119.00 | -21.81 | -20.83 | -21.19 | ||||||
| Child 3 | 53.00 | 94.00 | 147.00 | 50.00 | 89.00 | 139.00 | -5.66 | -5.31 | -5.44 | 42.00 | 75.00 | 117.00 | -16 | -15.73 | -15.82 | ||||||
| Child 4 | 75.00 | 118.00 | 193.00 | 72.00 | 113.00 | 185.00 | -4 | -4.23 | -4.14 | 60.00 | 100.00 | 160.00 | -16.66 | -11.50 | -13.51 | ||||||
| Child 5 | 48.00 | 85.00 | 133.00 | 46.00 | 81.00 | 127.00 | -4.16 | -4.70 | -4.51 | 36.00 | 63.00 | 99.00 | -21.73 | -22.22 | -22.04 | ||||||
| Child 6 | 60.00 | 100.00 | 160.00 | 57.00 | 97.00 | 154.00 | -5 | -3 | -3.75 | 50.00 | 83.00 | 133.00 | -12.28 | -14.43 | -13.63 | ||||||
Abbreviations: BRI: behavioral regulation index; MI: metacognition index; GEC: Global Executive Composite.