| Literature DB >> 35831797 |
Chong Chen1, Yong-Yu Ye2, Yi-Fan Chen2, Xiao-Xi Yang3, Jin-Qian Liang4, Guo-Yan Liang2, Xiao-Qing Zheng2, Yun-Bing Chang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA)-soaked absorbable Gelfoam and the retrograde injection of TXA through a drain with drain-clamping in degenerative cervical laminoplasty patients.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical laminoplasty; Degenerative cervical myelopathy; Perioperative blood loss; Tranexamic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35831797 PMCID: PMC9281023 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05626-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the topical application of tranexamic acid-soaked absorbable Gelfoam (A) and retrograde injection via drainage catheter (B)
Fig. 2Patient selection flowchart
Comparisons of the baseline characteristics among different groups
| Control group ( | TXA-Gel group ( | TXA-RI group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) [range] | 65.12 ± 8.72 | 64.43 ± 8.68 | 63.82 ± 9.43 | >0.05 |
| Sex (female/male) | 9/36 | 11/33 | 9/35 | >0.05 |
| BMI [range] | 21.37 ± 2.27 | 22.14 ± 1.90 | 21.44 ± 2.18 | >0.05 |
| Etiology of DCM (n) | ||||
| Cervical myelopathy | 31 | 32 | 33 | >0.05 |
| OPLL | 14 | 12 | 11 | >0.05 |
| Comorbidity | 2 | 3 | 3 | >0.05 |
| Surgical level | ||||
| C3–6 | 39 | 39 | 38 | >0.05 |
| C3–7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | >0.05 |
BMI Body mass index, DCM Degenerative cervical myelopathy, OPLL Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Outcome comparisons among three groups
| Control group ( | Gelfoam group ( | TXA group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Op time (min) | 91.20 ± 18.52 | 89.80 ± 19.73 | 87.20 ± 21.69 |
| EBL (mL) | 125.20 ± 45.44 | 138.60 ± 52.76 | 123.30 ± 35.83 |
| Hemovac drainage (mL) | |||
| The first 8 h postoperatively | 65.17 ± 17.66 | 37.72 ± 14.54† | 23.47 ± 10.66*, ‡ |
| The second 8 h postoperatively | 53.79 ± 19.88 | 21.44 ± 12.31† | 20.53 ± 13.28* |
| The third 8 h postoperatively | 33.64 ± 14.74 | 15.52 ± 13.54† | 13.28 ± 4.54* |
| Total drainage | 275.45 ± 75.27 | 156.60 ± 38.63† | 126.60 ± 31.27*, ‡ |
| Total blood loss | 417.20 ± 89.14 | 295.73 ± 68.54† | 251.80 ± 54.26* |
| Length of drainage (h) | 89.31 ± 8.50 | 58.70 ± 10.46† | 49.45 ± 9.70*, ‡ |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 13.53 ± 0.98 | 13.45 ± 1.23 | 13.22 ± 1.17 |
| Day 1 postoperation | 11.81 ± 1.54 | 12.49 ± 1.42† | 12.68 ± 1.64* |
| Day 3 postoperation | 11.18 ± 1.97 | 11.81 ± 1.36 | 12.14 ± 1.62*, ‡ |
| At discharge | 11.28 ± 1.76 | 12.14 ± 1.53† | 12.58 ± 1.67*, ‡ |
| Hematocrit (%) | |||
| Baseline | 40.10 ± 4.37 | 39.16 ± 3.74 | 41.24 ± 3.17 |
| Day 1 postoperation | 33.76 ± 4.28 | 34.12 ± 3.82 | 37.12 ± 3.94* |
| Day 3 postoperation | 32.52 ± 3.78 | 34.75 ± 3.56† | 35.95 ± 4.34* |
| At discharge | 33.82 ± 3.57 | 35.88 ± 4.12† | 36.13 ± 3.87* |
| Postoperative length of stay (d) | 7.50 ± 1.25 | 5.64 ± 0.96† | 5.31 ± 1.18* |
EBL Estimated intraoperative blood loss, Op time Operation time
* P < 0.05 between TXA group and Control group; † P < 0.05 between Gelfoam group and control group; ‡ P < 0.05 between TXA group and Gelfoam group
Fig. 3Perioperative coagulation panels in the three study groups. No significant differences were detected among the three groups for the prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR) or blood platelet count (PLT) on four perioperative time points, but in the TXA-RI and TXA-Gel groups, the D-dimmer (DD) and fibrinogen (FIB) were significantly lower than those in the control group after surgery. * P < 0.05