Wei Yuan1, Yue Zhu2. 1. Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. Electronic address: zhuyuedr@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have addressed the causes of poor expansion of the spinal canal after open-door laminoplasty (ODL) that require revision surgery. The aim of this study is to identify the reasons of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL and to discuss the surgical methods and clinical outcomes of the posterior revision surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent posterior revision surgery because of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL were retrospectively reviewed at our spine center. Clinical data, radiologic findings, method of surgical revision, interval between surgeries, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 16 patients that underwent posterior revision surgery because of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL. The main causes of poor expansion of the spinal canal included inadequate expansion degree of the spinal canal (75%, 12/16) and improper expansion range of the spinal canal (25%, 4/16). Revision surgery was performed with posterior ODL, laminectomy and fusion (LCF), or laminectomy of responsible lamina. The interval between the initial procedure and revision surgery was 72.2 months (range, 0.5-168 months). The mean JOA score was restored from 10.6 (range, 8-13) to 14.3 (range, 13-17) after the revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The main causes of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL were inadequate expansion degree of the spinal canal and improper expanded range of the spinal canal. Posterior revision surgeries, such as ODL, LCF, and laminectomy of responsible lamina, could guarantee fine clinical results.
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have addressed the causes of poor expansion of the spinal canal after open-door laminoplasty (ODL) that require revision surgery. The aim of this study is to identify the reasons of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL and to discuss the surgical methods and clinical outcomes of the posterior revision surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent posterior revision surgery because of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL were retrospectively reviewed at our spine center. Clinical data, radiologic findings, method of surgical revision, interval between surgeries, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 16 patients that underwent posterior revision surgery because of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL. The main causes of poor expansion of the spinal canal included inadequate expansion degree of the spinal canal (75%, 12/16) and improper expansion range of the spinal canal (25%, 4/16). Revision surgery was performed with posterior ODL, laminectomy and fusion (LCF), or laminectomy of responsible lamina. The interval between the initial procedure and revision surgery was 72.2 months (range, 0.5-168 months). The mean JOA score was restored from 10.6 (range, 8-13) to 14.3 (range, 13-17) after the revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The main causes of poor expansion of the spinal canal after ODL were inadequate expansion degree of the spinal canal and improper expanded range of the spinal canal. Posterior revision surgeries, such as ODL, LCF, and laminectomy of responsible lamina, could guarantee fine clinical results.