| Literature DB >> 35831478 |
Khadijeh Ahmadi1,2, Farzad Mahfouzi3, Loghman Jamilpanah1, Morteza Mohseni4, Tobias Böttcher4, Philipp Pirro4, Nicholas Kioussis3, Johan Åkerman5,6, S A Seyyed Ebrahimi2, Seyed Majid Mohseni7.
Abstract
The interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction (iDMI) is an antisymmetric exchange interaction that is induced by the broken inversion symmetry at the interface of, e.g., a ferromagnet/heavy metal. Thus, the presence of iDMI is not expected in symmetrical multilayer stacks of such structures. Here, we use thermal annealing to induce the iDMI in a [Py/Pt]×10 symmetrical multilayer stack. Brillouin light scattering spectroscopy is used to directly evidence the iDMI induction in the annealed sample. Structural characterizations highlight the modified crystallinity as well as a higher surface roughness of the sample after annealing. First principles electronic structure calculations demonstrate a monotonic increase of the iDMI with the interfacial disorder due to the interdiffusion of atoms, depicting the possible origin of the induced iDMI. The presented method can be used to tune the iDMI strength in symmetric multilayers, which are the integral part of racetrack memories, magnonic devices as well as spin-orbitronic elements.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35831478 PMCID: PMC9427985 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16244-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1(a–b) The AFM images, (c–d) MFM images and (e–f) SEM images of the as-deposited and annealed samples respectively. (g–h) The XRD pattern and, the in-plane and out of plane hysteresis loops before and after annealing.
Figure 2Results from the Brillouin light scattering spectroscopy. (a–b) The measured BLS spectra of the SWs having wave number of k = 20.44 rad/μm in the presence of two different applied field values ( H = ± 50 mT) for the as-deposited and annealed samples, respectively. Symbols refer to the experimental data and solid lines are the Lorentzian fits. (c–d) The measured dispersion relation of the SWs including the Stokes (S) and anti-Stokes (AS) peaks for the as-deposited and annealed samples respectively. Symbols and solid lines correspond to the experimental data and linear fits results. (e–f) The frequency difference f between the counter-propagating SWs as a function of the wave vector for the as-deposited and annealed samples, respectively.
Figure 3(a) Top view of L12 Ni3Fe crystal structure with primitive lattice constant, 3.54 Å, where the blue (red) spheres denote the Ni (Fe) atoms. (b) Top view of FCC Pt crystal structure with primitive lattice constant, 2.81 Å. The in-plane lattice vectors are chosen so as to minimize the in-plane lattice mismatch between Ni3Fe and Pt to 2%. (c, d, e) Side views of the Ni3Fe(1 nm)/Pt(0.85 nm) bilayer device for various levels of substitutional disorders introduced at the interface via switching the Ni and Pt positions. (f) Calculated interfacial DMI versus concentration of Fe elements interfaced with Pt film.